Dear Wolfgang
Am 14.06.2011 08:18, schrieb Matthias Weißer:
> Am 23.05.2011 11:03, schrieb Matthias Weisser:
>> In some cases (e.g. bootm with a elf payload which is already at the right
>> position) there is a in place copy of data to the same address. Catching this
>> saves some ms while booting
Wolfgang,
The following changes since commit b1af6f532e0d348b153d5c148369229d24af361a:
Prepare v2011.06 (2011-06-27 22:22:42 +0200)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.denx.de/u-boot-arm.git master
Aneesh V (9):
arm: make default implementation of cache_flush() weakly
On MPC85xx based NAND_SPL builds we generate a u-boot-nand_spl.lds based
on output from preprocessor. We where never removed it.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala
---
Makefile |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index a344536..689fddb 100644
---
Hi Heiko,
On Thursday 30 June 2011 11:31 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> Hello Aneesh,
>
> Aneesh V wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Aneesh V
>> ---
>> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/Makefile |9 ++--
>> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/spl.c| 56
>> arch/arm/cpu/armv7
Hello Aneesh,
Aneesh V wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Aneesh V
> ---
> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/Makefile |9 ++--
> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/spl.c| 56
> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/spl.lds | 62
> +++
> 3 files chang
On Thursday 30 June 2011 12:24 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 29, 2011 09:09:22 Aneesh V wrote:
>> Makefile | 18 +-
>> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>
>> # Always append ALL so that arch config.mk's can add custom ones
>
> as this comment
On Thursday 30 June 2011 12:22 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 29, 2011 09:09:21 Aneesh V wrote:
>> -$(obj)%.s: %.S
>> +$(obj)%.s: $(src)%.S
I too didn't understand why that was done. But I noticed it just before
sending the patches so decided to give it a try later. I tried remov
Thanks for your help I will study up on this more and get back with more
questions next week! thanks for your help..
BTW I just bought an eprom programer off EBAY it will take quite some time to
ship it from china, so i am making baby steps.. :)
> Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 12:17:46 +1000
> Sub
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Raleigh Boulware
wrote:
>
>
>> Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 11:58:55 +1000
>> Subject: Re: more U-boot for Pentium
>> From: graeme.r...@gmail.com
>> To: r_boulw...@hotmail.com
>> CC: u-boot@lists.denx.de
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Raleigh Boulware
>> wrote
> Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 11:58:55 +1000
> Subject: Re: more U-boot for Pentium
> From: graeme.r...@gmail.com
> To: r_boulw...@hotmail.com
> CC: u-boot@lists.denx.de
>
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Raleigh Boulware
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Hi Raleigh,
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 11:1
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Raleigh Boulware
wrote:
>
>
>> Hi Raleigh,
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Raleigh Boulware
>> wrote:
>> > I have been going through the code and I have stumbled accross a file
>> > called
>> > sc520_car.S that has something called Cache as ram. I am gues
> Hi Raleigh,
>
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Raleigh Boulware
> wrote:
> > I have been going through the code and I have stumbled accross a file called
> > sc520_car.S that has something called Cache as ram. I am guessing that this
> > is something special for the sc520 correct? Why w
Hi Raleigh,
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Raleigh Boulware
wrote:
> I have been going through the code and I have stumbled accross a file called
> sc520_car.S that has something called Cache as ram. I am guessing that this
> is something special for the sc520 correct? Why was there a need to
I have been going through the code and I have stumbled accross a file called
sc520_car.S that has something called Cache as ram. I am guessing that this is
something special for the sc520 correct? Why was there a need to do this? Why
was the Cache used like ram in the boot process?
Also I am I
On Wednesday, June 29, 2011 17:21:46 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Please stick to the rules. These apply to everbody, including you.
> Even more so to you, as you have the experience and knowledge so that
> you actually should be aware of how these things get done.
you'll need to revise the wiki then a
On Wednesday, June 29, 2011 18:32:49 Andreas Bießmann wrote:
> --- a/arch/arm/lib/board.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/lib/board.c
>
> -const char version_string[] =
> - U_BOOT_VERSION" (" U_BOOT_DATE " - " U_BOOT_TIME ")"CONFIG_IDENT_STRING;
> +const char * const version_string = U_BOOT_VERSION_STRING;
t
HOPE FOR JAPAN NOW: DONATE TO THE EARTHQUAKE & TSUNAMI VICTIMS
The United Nations International Children Emergency Fund (UNICEF, USA) hereby
appeal to all Cooperate Bodies, Non Governmental Organizations (NGO),
Celebrities, Government Official, Individuals including you as well, on behalf
of t
I need the AT91SAM9G45 port - if I need to bring it up to date to keep it
among the living I will volunteer, but if one of the usual AT91 maintainers is
already working on it I suspect they can do it more easily than I.
I can start work on the 9G45 update in early July if necessary.
Thanks,
This patch adds a new U_BOOT_VERSION_STRING definition to be placed in
symbol version_string in the arch specific implementations.
This is a preperation for easier modification of the version_string
variable over all architectures.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Bießmann
CC: Mike Frysinger
CC: Peter Pan
Hi Joel,
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Joel A Fernandes wrote:
> With this, the EHCI seems to "recover" from a timeout. This is particularly
> observable if you were to ping the wrong IP Address and then ping the correct
> one or if there was a temporary failure during tftp sessions.
>
> All
Since panic() never returns, we should add an appropriate attribute to
let gcc improve optimization around it.
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger
---
include/common.h |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/common.h b/include/common.h
index 1e21b7a..b59079b 1
On Wednesday, June 29, 2011 17:01:23 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > do we really care about that when people are using #define DEBUG ? i'd
> > say this is an unnecessary indirection ...
>
> Yes, we do care about the memory footprint - no matter whether with or
> without DEBUG.
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message <1309315854-10359-1-git-send-email-vap...@gentoo.org> you wrote:
> The following changes since commit b1af6f532e0d348b153d5c148369229d24af361a:
>
> Prepare v2011.06 (2011-06-27 22:22:42 +0200)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
> git://www.denx.de/git
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message <1309289787-7846-1-git-send-email-vap...@gentoo.org> you wrote:
> Many of these have been posted already, but some have not. We've pulled
> some updates from the Linux port, added support for multiple serial devs
> at the same time, and random tweaks/improvements a
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message <1309289196-5718-1-git-send-email-vap...@gentoo.org> you wrote:
> All of thse patches have been posted previously, and no one has
> given feedback, so here they are in a handy branch for you to pull.
>
> The following changes since commit b1af6f532e0d348b153d5c1483
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message <1309282783-27244-1-git-send-email-vap...@gentoo.org> you wrote:
> The following changes since commit b1af6f532e0d348b153d5c148369229d24af361a:
>
> Prepare v2011.06 (2011-06-27 22:22:42 +0200)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
> git://www.denx.de/git
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message <1309282694-27103-1-git-send-email-vap...@gentoo.org> you wrote:
> These have all been posted already. A few part updates, bug fixes,
> code unification, and that kind of fun stuff.
Then why exactly are you reposting these here?
And IF these are reposts, why dopn
Dear Stefan Roese,
In message <201106291019.59554...@denx.de> you wrote:
> Hi Wolfgang,
>
> please pull the following patch:
>
> The following changes since commit b1af6f532e0d348b153d5c148369229d24af361a:
>
> Prepare v2011.06 (2011-06-27 22:22:42 +0200)
>
> are available in the git reposito
Dear Albert,
In message <4e0ac19d.9070...@aribaud.net> you wrote:
>
> Please disregard this pull request. As it came too late for 2011-06,
OK.
> I'll re-issue it after I have merged in my current 'next' branch and the
> patches Igor has mentioned, as soon as the merge window is announced.
Th
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message <201106291643.32477.vap...@gentoo.org> you wrote:
>
> do we really care about that when people are using #define DEBUG ? i'd say
> this is an unnecessary indirection ...
Yes, we do care about the memory footprint - no matter whether with or
without DEBUG.
Best re
On Wednesday, June 29, 2011 15:49:34 Simon Glass wrote:
> - Use separate __assert_fail() function to reduce memory footprint
do we really care about that when people are using #define DEBUG ? i'd say
this is an unnecessary indirection ...
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally si
Jerry,
Now that the merge window is open, could you please update libfdt?
The version in U-Boot hasn't been updated in over a year, and there
are new features that I need to have. Specifically, this commit:
http://git.jdl.com/gitweb/?p=dtc.git;a=commit;h=d75b33af676d0beac8398651a7f09037555a550b
assert() is like BUG_ON() but compiles to nothing unless DEBUG is defined.
This is useful when a condition is an error but a board reset is unlikely
to fix it, so it is better to soldier on in hope. Assertion failures should
be caught during development/test.
It turns out that assert() is defined
Hi Tabi,
On 06/29/2011 03:40 PM, Tabi Timur-B04825 wrote:
> Jerry,
>
> Now that the merge window is open, could you please update libfdt?
> The version in U-Boot hasn't been updated in over a year, and there
> are new features that I need to have. Specifically, this commit:
> http://git.jdl.com/g
Dear Jeroen Hofstee,
In message <4e0b8f82.4000...@myspectrum.nl> you wrote:
>
> rules.mk uses the GNU specific sed \w leading to not directly obvious
> Make / _depend errors in the build process, like circular dependencies
You should probably mention when such errors result - I have never seen
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 6:04 AM, Detlev Zundel wrote:
> Hi Anton,
>
> > Previously reading or writing zero full sectors (reading the end of
> > one sector and the beginning of the next for example) was special
> > cased and involved stack allocating a second sector buffer. This
> > change uses t
On Wednesday, June 29, 2011 09:09:22 Aneesh V wrote:
> Makefile | 18 +-
> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> # Always append ALL so that arch config.mk's can add custom ones
as this comment indicates, you forgot to up date arch config.mk's that append
ALL.
On Wednesday, June 29, 2011 09:09:21 Aneesh V wrote:
> -$(obj)%.s: %.S
> +$(obj)%.s: $(src)%.S
why ? i dont see any explanation for this.
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@list
Hi Wolfgang / All,
rules.mk uses the GNU specific sed \w leading to not directly obvious
Make / _depend errors in the build process, like circular dependencies
warnings / crc32.c not found (some example and (incorrect) fixes), e.g.:
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-May/051931.html
http
Hi all,
Le 28/06/2011 12:55, Wolfgang Denk a écrit :
> Hello all,
>
> U-Boot v2011.06 has been released and is available from the git
> repository and the FTP server.
>
> KNOWN ISSUES:
>
> - The cleanup after the reorganization of the ARM code has not been
>completed yet. At the moment, approa
Hi Stefano
Am 29.06.2011 17:48, schrieb Stefano Babic:
> Hi Matthias,
>
>>> In message<4e0b3331.9030...@arcor.de> you wrote:
If a soc automatically generates asm-offsets.s/h in its makefile it
isn't removed by a make clean or make distclean. See mx35 as an example.
Even addin
Hi Matthias,
Le 29/06/2011 14:08, Matthias Weisser a écrit :
> Enable dcache and arch memset/memcpy for speed reasons
> Remove of config.mk and some environment overwrites
> Some generic cleanup
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthias Weisser
> ---
> board/syteco/jadecpu/config.mk |1 -
> board/syteco/
Ack, you're right, I didn't mean to include the printf changes. Sorry about
that, I will be more careful with the next patches. Would it be best to
leave this patch as it is or split it up for the next version (if there is
one)?
Thanks,
Anton
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 5:13 AM, Detlev Zundel
Am 29.06.2011 19:56, schrieb Albert ARIBAUD:
> Le 29/06/2011 14:08, Matthias Weisser a écrit :
>> Enable dcache and arch memset/memcpy for speed reasons
>> Remove of config.mk and some environment overwrites
>> Some generic cleanup
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Matthias Weisser
>
> Hi Matthias,
>
> I assu
On Jun 27, 2011, at 1:39 AM, Felix Radensky wrote:
> On P1022/P1013 second USB controller is muxed with second
> Ethernet controller. The current code to enable second USB
> fails to properly clear pinmux bits used by ethernet. As a
> result, Linux freezes when this controller is used. This
> pat
Le 29/06/2011 14:08, Matthias Weisser a écrit :
> Enable dcache and arch memset/memcpy for speed reasons
> Remove of config.mk and some environment overwrites
> Some generic cleanup
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthias Weisser
Hi Matthias,
I assume this has been tested?
Amicalement,
--
Albert.
_
Signed-off-by: Jason Hobbs
---
Changes for v2:
- Add armv7 architecture to VCI string
include/configs/ca9x4_ct_vxp.h |5 +
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/configs/ca9x4_ct_vxp.h b/include/configs/ca9x4_ct_vxp.h
index 7f83249..fdf9a2a 100644
--- a/in
Signed-off-by: Jason Hobbs
---
Changes for v2:
- Move uuid_str_to_bin's prototype from uuid. to common.h
- Place uuid.o make rule in sorted order and conditionalize
Changes for v3:
- Check for NULL pointers in uuid conversion function
include/common.h |3 +++
lib/Makefile |1 +
lib/
These options are required to be present in RFC 4578 compliant DHCP
requests. They give more information to DHCP servers to allow serving
different DHCP responses to different systems based on client
architecture, client capabilities, UUID, or vendor.
Signed-off-by: Jason Hobbs
---
Changes for v2
This patch series adds support for RFC 4578 compliant DHCP request
options, which enhance the ability of DHCP servers to respond
differently to different clients.
As an example, the last patch in this series enables support for the PXE
DHCP options for the ca9x4_ct_vxp config.
changes in v2:
- d
Add pxecfg command, which is intended to mimic PXELINUX functionality.
'pxecfg get' uses tftp to retrieve a file based on UUID, MAC address or
IP address. 'pxecfg boot' interprets the contents of PXELINUX config
like file to boot using a specific initrd, kernel and kernel command
line.
This patch
Signed-off-by: Jason Hobbs
---
changes in v2:
- use CONFIG_MENU to enable building the menu for pxecfg use
include/configs/ca9x4_ct_vxp.h |5 +
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/configs/ca9x4_ct_vxp.h b/include/configs/ca9x4_ct_vxp.h
index 7f83249..f3
Signed-off-by: Jason Hobbs
---
changes in v2:
- whitespace correction
common/hush.c|2 +-
common/main.c| 46 +++---
include/common.h |1 +
include/hush.h |2 +-
4 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/common
Signed-off-by: Jason Hobbs
---
changes in v2:
- expose abortboot externally instead of using a wrapper
- expose abortboot externally when CONFIG_MENU is set
changes in v3:
- simplify the conditional export of abortboot
- add timeout support for the menu in this patch
- add doc for timeout feature
Signed-off-by: Jason Hobbs
---
changes in v2:
- new in v2
common/main.c | 12 ++--
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/common/main.c b/common/main.c
index 1a371b1..489c9e9 100644
--- a/common/main.c
+++ b/common/main.c
@@ -397,15 +397,15 @@ void main_loop (vo
Remove an unneeded prototype declaration from the top of main.c,
and use plain inline instead of __inline__ to please checkpatch.
Signed-off-by: Jason Hobbs
---
changes in v3:
- new in v3
common/main.c |8 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/common/main.
This will be used first by the pxecfg code, but is intended to be
generic and reusable for other jobs in U-boot.
Signed-off-by: Jason Hobbs
---
changes in v2:
- new in v2
changes in v3:
- move timeout support to later patch
- fix NULL case bug in menu_item_key_match
- consistently use 'item_
The pxecfg commands provide a near subset of the functionality provided
by the PXELINUX boot loader. This allows U-boot based systems to be
controlled remotely using the same PXE based techniques that many non
U-boot based servers use. To avoid identity confusion with PXELINUX, and
because not all
On 06/29/2011 05:00 PM, Matthias Weißer wrote:
> Am 29.06.2011 16:20, schrieb Wolfgang Denk:
>> Dear =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Matthias_Wei=DFer?=,
>>
Hi Matthias,
>> In message<4e0b3331.9030...@arcor.de> you wrote:
>>>
>>> If a soc automatically generates asm-offsets.s/h in its makefile it
>>> isn't remo
Am 29.06.2011 16:20, schrieb Wolfgang Denk:
> Dear =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Matthias_Wei=DFer?=,
>
> In message<4e0b3331.9030...@arcor.de> you wrote:
>>
>> If a soc automatically generates asm-offsets.s/h in its makefile it
>> isn't removed by a make clean or make distclean. See mx35 as an example.
>> Even
Dear =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Matthias_Wei=DFer?=,
In message <4e0b3331.9030...@arcor.de> you wrote:
>
> If a soc automatically generates asm-offsets.s/h in its makefile it
> isn't removed by a make clean or make distclean. See mx35 as an example.
> Even adding a clean: target to the SoCs makefile doesn't
On 06/29/11 08:55, Christopher Harvey wrote:
> kernel version: 2.6.38
> u-boot version: 2011.06
>
> I've got an ARM (armv7) kernel that I can boot under QEMU without
> problems, but refuses to boot with a bootm command under u-boot.
>
> All I see is "Uncompressing Linux... done, booting the kerne
Hi
If a soc automatically generates asm-offsets.s/h in its makefile it
isn't removed by a make clean or make distclean. See mx35 as an example.
Even adding a clean: target to the SoCs makefile doesn't help. What
would be the right way to remove these files with make clean?
Regards
Matthias We
Dear Christopher Harvey,
One thought.. Just check you are using correct serial port as console.
On 29 June 2011 18:25, Christopher Harvey wrote:
> kernel version: 2.6.38
> u-boot version: 2011.06
>
> I've got an ARM (armv7) kernel that I can boot under QEMU without
> problems, but refuses to boo
Dear Christopher Harvey,
In message <4e0b20d0.4070...@matrox.com> you wrote:
>
> I was under the impression that the second a working kernel got passed
> the "Uncompressing Linux... done, booting the kernel." point there was
> very little that could go wrong since it means the kernel was completel
Signed-off-by: Aneesh V
---
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap4/Makefile | 12 ++--
include/configs/omap4_sdp4430.h |8
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap4/Makefile
b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap4/Makefile
index 987dc9d..f28eb37 10064
Signed-off-by: Aneesh V
---
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/Makefile |9 ++--
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/spl.c| 56
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/spl.lds | 62 +++
3 files changed, 123 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
create
Signed-off-by: Aneesh V
---
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/Makefile |9 +
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/Makefile b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/Makefile
index 8c0e915..549ade6 100644
--- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/Makefile
+++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/Makefile
@@ -
From: Daniel Schwierzeck
[ane...@ti.com:
1. Changed definition of OBJTREE for SPL
2. Added support for linker script from various places
4. $(OBJTREE)/spl/obj for objects
5. Minor cleanup
]
Signed-off-by: Aneesh V
Signed-off-by: Daniel Schwierzeck
---
spl/Makefile | 105 ++
This is an extention of Daniel Schwierzeck's work [1]
on a new SPL framework and is intented only as a prototype to
facilitate further discussion.
Please refer [2] for an overview of this approach:
I have extended his work to make it a little more generic, did
some minor modifications and adapted
From: Daniel Schwierzeck
Signed-off-by: Daniel Schwierzeck
---
Makefile | 18 +-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index dcf5d93..813b03b 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -311,22 +311,14 @@ BOARD_SIZE_CHECK =
endif
#
From: Daniel Schwierzeck
Signed-off-by: Daniel Schwierzeck
---
Makefile |8
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index 813b03b..ea35b17 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -317,6 +317,7 @@ ALL-$(CONFIG_NAND_U_BOOT) += $(obj)u-boot-n
From: Daniel Schwierzeck
[ane...@ti.com:
1. Changed the definition of OBJTREE and the way 'obj' is defined.
2. Defined a flag to identify regular U-Boot build
3. Taking care of autoconf.mk etc for SPL due to changed OBJTREE
]
Signed-off-by: Aneesh V
Signed-off-by: Daniel Schwierzeck
---
config
Hi Anton,
> Previously reading or writing zero full sectors (reading the end of
> one sector and the beginning of the next for example) was special
> cased and involved stack allocating a second sector buffer. This
> change uses the same code path for this case as well as when there
> are a non-z
kernel version: 2.6.38
u-boot version: 2011.06
I've got an ARM (armv7) kernel that I can boot under QEMU without
problems, but refuses to boot with a bootm command under u-boot.
All I see is "Uncompressing Linux... done, booting the kernel.", then
nothing else.
I'm also hitting a bug very simila
Hi Anton,
> Fix all checkpatch violations in the low level Ext2 block
> device reading code. This is done in preparation for cleaning
> up the partial sector access code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anton Staaf
> Cc: Andy Fleming
> ---
> fs/ext2/dev.c | 82
> ++---
Enable dcache and arch memset/memcpy for speed reasons
Remove of config.mk and some environment overwrites
Some generic cleanup
Signed-off-by: Matthias Weisser
---
board/syteco/jadecpu/config.mk |1 -
board/syteco/jadecpu/jadecpu.c |5 +
include/configs/jadecpu.h | 24
There is a optimized version of memset in u-boot available so use it instead
of the hand written loop version.
Signed-off-by: Matthias Weisser
---
drivers/video/mb86r0xgdc.c |3 +--
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/video/mb86r0xgdc.c b/drivers/video/mb86
Hi Stefan,
[...]
> This patch does not apply:
>
> Applying: For bug in UBIFS function ubifs_finddir
> Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
> error: patch failed: fs/ubifs/ubifs.c:360
> error: fs/ubifs/ubifs.c: patch does not apply
> Did you hand edit your patch?
>
> How did you create t
Hi Rod,
> Free private_data member element before freeing file structure. This
> was causing malloc to crash. Also remove unnecessary variable
> assigments after file structure was free'd.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rod Boyce
> --- fs/ubifs/ubifs.c
> ---
From: Helmut Raiger
The driver already had the MII functions, but they have not been
registered using miiphy_register().
Signed-off-by: Helmut Raiger
---
drivers/net/smc911x.c | 36 ++--
1 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/n
* Fix compiler error for cpu at91sam9, if lowlevel init is enabled
* use correct ATMEL_ name scheme to define ATMEL_BASE_SDRAMC
Signed-off-by: Jens Scharsig
---
arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91sam9_sdramc.h |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/incl
Dear Simon Schwarz,
Am 28.06.2011 16:14, schrieb simonschwarz...@googlemail.com:
> Add support for NAND_SPL to omap gpmc driver. This means adding
> nand_read_buf16 to read from GPMC 32bit buffer (16 here means 16bit bus!) and
> adding omap_dev_ready as indicator if the GPMC is ready.
You als
Hi Suresh,
On Friday 24 June 2011 12:54:41 suresh kumar wrote:
> Thanks for your suggestion. Now i have migrated to uboot v2011.06-rc2
> and the booting sequece is working fine. But the problem still i am
> facing is not able access the external periherals like NVRAM and ADC,
> DAC etc. What mini
Dear Simon Schwarz,
Am 28.06.2011 16:14, schrieb simonschwarz...@googlemail.com:
> Deactivates caching in SPL. Add call to preloader_console_init for early
> console output.
well, deactivating caches make the process much slower. I recommend
don't disabeling it!
BTW, this patch also add preloa
Hi Rod,
On Saturday 18 June 2011 12:30:18 Rod Boyce wrote:
> Add functionality to update filesize environment variable when
> ubifs_load is called to read a file from filesystem
>
> Signed-off-by: Rod Boyce
> --- fs/ubifs/ubifs.c
> --
> dif
Hi Rod,
On Saturday 18 June 2011 11:51:11 Rod Boyce wrote:
> Free private_data member element before freeing file structure. This
> was causing malloc to crash. Also remove unnecessary variable
> assigments after file structure was free'd.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rod Boyce
> ---
Dear Simon Schwarz,
(this is a review of RFC for omap3 nand spl Simon does for his bachelor
thesis, there is one question in regarding the current 'SPL framework
redesign' discussion -> entry point for spl code).
Am 28.06.2011 16:14, schrieb simonschwarz...@googlemail.com:
> --
>
> diff --git
Hi Wolfgang,
please pull the following patch:
The following changes since commit b1af6f532e0d348b153d5c148369229d24af361a:
Prepare v2011.06 (2011-06-27 22:22:42 +0200)
are available in the git repository at:
git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-cfi-flash.git master
Mike Frysinger (1):
cfi_fl
On Tuesday 10 May 2011 00:33:36 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> For newer STM parts where CFI >= 1.1, there is a byte in the extended
> structure that declares the flash layout type (just like the AMD parts),
> so key off of that to find out when we need to reverse the geometry.
>
> This can be seen with
Nowdays, there are plenty of mmc driver in uboot adopt the sd standard
host design, aka as sdhci. It is better to centralize the common logic
together to better maintenance.
Signed-off-by: Lei Wen
---
V1:
add sdhci generic framework
V2:
No Change
drivers/mmc/Makefile |1 +
drivers/mmc/sdhc
This could support both armada100 and pantheon serial in the mainline,
while this driver also be tested to support upcoming mg, mmp2 and mmp3
hardware.
Signed-off-by: Lei Wen
---
V1:
add marvell sdhci driver implementation
V2:
rename the previous file name from sdhci-mv to mv_sdhci
drivers/mmc
V1:
add sdhci generic framework and with marvell sdhci implementation
V2:
rename the previous file name from sdhci-mv to mv_sdhci
Lei Wen (2):
MMC: add sdhci generic framework
MMC: add marvell sdhci driver
drivers/mmc/Makefile |2 +
drivers/mmc/mv_sdhci.c | 21 +++
drivers/mmc/sdhci
Hi Prafulla,
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Prafulla Wadaskar wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Lei Wen [mailto:adrian.w...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 9:17 AM
>> To: Lei Wen
>> Cc: Andy Fleming; Rob Herring; u-boot@lists.denx.de; Prafulla Wadaskar;
>> Yu Tang;
On Tuesday 28 June 2011 09:48 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 12:24:11 +0530
> Aneesh V wrote:
>
>> 1. If there are SPL customized generic files like the
>> nand_spl/nand_boot.c where do we keep them? I suggest that we keep them
>> in spl/nand, spl/onenand etc. And for the object file
> -Original Message-
> From: Lei Wen [mailto:adrian.w...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 9:17 AM
> To: Lei Wen
> Cc: Andy Fleming; Rob Herring; u-boot@lists.denx.de; Prafulla Wadaskar;
> Yu Tang; Prabhanjan Sarnaik; Ashish Karkare
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] MMC: add s
96 matches
Mail list logo
