Re: [U-Boot] Hi

2010-09-02 Thread Tobias Waldekranz (Knutsson)
Did you download the version from hawkboard.org? In that case, you should be able to follow the instructions on: http://elinux.org/Hawkboard#Compiling_u-boot_.28bootloader.29 If you are using the git version of u-boot replace omapl_hawkboard_config with da850evm_config and try to boot that first

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC][PATCH 3/3] Add board support for the eXMeritus HWW-1U-1A devices

2010-09-02 Thread Kyle Moffett
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 00:00, Peter Tyser wrote: > Hi Kyle, Hi! Thanks for the great in-depth review, I really appreciate it! I've included my comments below, and I'll try to respin the patches here soon. I've dropped the second patch (the e1000e one) as it's apparently just a workaround for a

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC][PATCH 1/3] DDR2: Support new JEDEC DDR2 SPD 1.3 spec

2010-09-02 Thread Kyle Moffett
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 23:06, Peter Tyser wrote: >> +/* These are all the types defined by the JEDEC DDR2 SPD 1.3 spec */ >> +#define SPD_DIMM_TYPE_UNDEFINED              0x00 >> +#define SPD_DIMM_TYPE_RDIMM          0x01 >> +#define SPD_DIMM_TYPE_UDIMM          0x02 >> +#define SPD_DIMM_TYPE_SO_D

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC][PATCH 1/3] DDR2: Support new JEDEC DDR2 SPD 1.3 spec

2010-09-02 Thread Peter Tyser
Hi Kyle, > +/* These are all the types defined by the JEDEC DDR2 SPD 1.3 spec */ > +#define SPD_DIMM_TYPE_UNDEFINED 0x00 > +#define SPD_DIMM_TYPE_RDIMM 0x01 > +#define SPD_DIMM_TYPE_UDIMM 0x02 > +#define SPD_DIMM_TYPE_SO_DIMM0x04 > +#define SPD_DIMM

Re: [U-Boot] P1011RDB & P1020RDB: NAND bootstrap too big

2010-09-02 Thread Bryan Hundven
This was a git clone from today. Built with a pretty standard e500v2 gnuspe timesys toolchain. I was able to build and run P1020RDB_config on the freescale demo board. --- From: Bryan Hundven Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 2:42 PM To

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/2] APM82xxx: Add CPU and other peripheral support

2010-09-02 Thread Tirumala Marri
Mr Wolfgang, > Hm... is this APM82? Official press releases refer to this as > APM821xx? Or ist it APM82xxx? [Marri] You are correct APM821XX is right name. > > If you don't decide to print "64" here, then please pull all the > APM82??? > code into a separate #ifdef block. [Marri] Sure will do. >

Re: [U-Boot] zImage on ARM

2010-09-02 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Steve Sakoman, In message you wrote: > I have a client that has asked me to look into loading zImage files > instead of uImage for some ARM based boards. Why? > Any words of advice or warning in doing something similar for ARM? No. IMO it makes little sense. > Anyone familiar with the h

Re: [U-Boot] zImage on ARM

2010-09-02 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
> > I have a client that has asked me to look into loading zImage files > instead of uImage for some ARM based boards. > > A quick search of the code base turned up some zimage code in the i386 > area. > > Any words of advice or warning in doing something similar for ARM? > > Anyone familiar

[U-Boot] P1011RDB & P1020RDB: NAND bootstrap too big

2010-09-02 Thread Bryan Hundven
When I build either P1011RDB_NAND_config or P1020RDB_NAND_config, I get: make[1]: Entering directory `/home/bryan/Source/u-boot/nand_spl/board/freescale/p1_p2_rdb' /opt/WG/ppc-linux26-glibc211/bin/ppc-gcc -D__ASSEMBLY__ -g -Os -mrelocatable -fPIC -meabi -D__KERNEL__ -DTEXT_BASE=0xfff0

[U-Boot] zImage on ARM

2010-09-02 Thread Steve Sakoman
I have a client that has asked me to look into loading zImage files instead of uImage for some ARM based boards. A quick search of the code base turned up some zimage code in the i386 area. Any words of advice or warning in doing something similar for ARM? Anyone familiar with the history of why

[U-Boot] [PATCH] p1022ds: add video support

2010-09-02 Thread Timur Tabi
Add support for the DIU controller. If CONFIG_VIDEO is defined, then the console will appear on a DVI monitor instead of the serial port. Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi --- This patch depends on: [v3] fsl: refactor MPC8610 and MPC5121 DIU code to use existing bitmap and logo features board/frees

Re: [U-Boot] Delay in U-boot Booting , Running U-boot from NOR Flash

2010-09-02 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear =?iso-8859-1?Q?=A0Gurumurthy_G_M?=, In message <5858de952c53a441bda3408a0524130104cce...@mkegmal01> you wrote: > >I am using u-boot-2010.03 version, ported u-boot for MIPS32 AU13xx series. > U-boot is taking 5-7 seconds to boot after power up. What is your "bootdelay" setting? > Is th

[U-Boot] Delay in U-boot Booting , Running U-boot from NOR Flash

2010-09-02 Thread  Gurumurthy G M
Hi, I am using u-boot-2010.03 version, ported u-boot for MIPS32 AU13xx series. U-boot is taking 5-7 seconds to boot after power up. u-boot.bin is programmed in NOR Flash. Is there any option to skip relocating to DDR2 (SDRAM) so that I want to check booting u-boot from NOR Flash itself. P

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/2] APM82xxx: Add CPU and other peripheral support

2010-09-02 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Tirumala Marri, In message you wrote: > > > On the other hand, this seems to be a 464 core, so should we not print > > 464 here? > [Marri] Interesting point, For all other processors we were printing SoC > name not the CPU core name. > APM82xxx is SoC name. OK. Hm.., the whole CPU ID code

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/2] APM82xxx: Add CPU and other peripheral support

2010-09-02 Thread Tirumala Marri
Mr Wolfgang, > > On the other hand, this seems to be a 464 core, so should we not print > 464 here? [Marri] Interesting point, For all other processors we were printing SoC name not the CPU core name. APM82xxx is SoC name. > > diff --git a/include/ppc440.h b/include/ppc440.h > > index c807dda..b

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] display_buffer: fix misaligned buffer

2010-09-02 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday, August 31, 2010 02:04:53 Reinhard Meyer wrote: > making the change to the union, I also realized that > > /* Copy from memory into linebuf and print hex values */ > for (i = 0; i < linelen; i++) { > uint32_t x; > if (width == 4) > x = lb.u32[i] = *(volatile ui

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] zlib: Add further watchdog reset calls

2010-09-02 Thread Detlev Zundel
Hi Stefan, > Patch 253cb831 [zlib: add watchdog reset call] added already a few > watchdog reset calls to the new zlib U-Boot port. But on some boards > this is not enough. Additional calls are needed on boards with > short watchdog timeouts. > > This was detected and tested on the lwmon5 board wi

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2 08/11] mtd: nand: supress 'unknown NAND' warning if no nand is found

2010-09-02 Thread Steve Sakoman
This printk was added recently and results in ugly output on systems with no NAND: NAND: nand_get_flash_type: unknown NAND device: Manufacturer ID: 0x00, Chip ID: 0x00 0 MiB instead of: NAND: 0 MiB Signed-off-by: Steve Sakoman --- drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c |7 +-- 1 files change

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC][PATCH] mkimage: Add compatibility option for legacy Multi-File images

2010-09-02 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Thibaut Girka, In message <1282164515-28846-1-git-send-email-t...@sitedethib.com> you wrote: > During a few months, offsets of files in multi-file images were miscalculated, > this has been fixed by 02b9b22446e3d7ad6a6382be17a1ce79a7de589b, > but unfortunatly, some devices (I'm thinking of th

Re: [U-Boot] MPC8536 custom board without SPD EEPROM configured DDR

2010-09-02 Thread Timur Tabi
On Thursday, September 2, 2010, Carlos Roberto Moratelli wrote: > My question is why this happens to the MPC8536ds target? I suppose I > must configure law and tbl entries in a similar way like MPC8540ads. It happens because once we get SPD working on a board, the non-SPD code usually succumbs t

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/2] APM82xxx: Add bluestone board support

2010-09-02 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear tma...@apm.com, In message <1283390223-28300-1-git-send-email-tma...@apm.com> you wrote: > From: Tirumala Marri > > Add support code for bluestone board wth APM82XXX processor based. > This patch includes early board init, misc init, configure EBC, > initializes UIC, MAKEALL, board.cfg and

[U-Boot] MPC8536 custom board without SPD EEPROM configured DDR

2010-09-02 Thread Carlos Roberto Moratelli
Hi, I am facing some issues porting u-boot to a MPC8536 custom board. My custom board doesn't implement SPD EEPROM to configure ddr, so I must setup ddr manually. I am starting from MPC8536ds target. This board uses a SPD EEPROM to configure the ddr controler. So, I undefined CONFIG_SPD_EEPROM an

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/2] APM82xxx: Add CPU and other peripheral support

2010-09-02 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear tma...@apm.com, In message <1283390214-28255-1-git-send-email-tma...@apm.com> you wrote: > From: Tirumala Marri > > APM82XXX is a new line of SoCs which are derivatives of > PPC44X family of processors. > > This patch adds support of CPU, cache, > tlb, 32k ocm, bootstraps, PLB AHB bus, DDR

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/2] APM82xxx: Add bluestone board support

2010-09-02 Thread Stefan Roese
Hi Marri, On Thursday 02 September 2010 03:17:03 tma...@apm.com wrote: > From: Tirumala Marri > > Add support code for bluestone board wth APM82XXX processor based. > This patch includes early board init, misc init, configure EBC, > initializes UIC, MAKEALL, board.cfg and MAINTAINERS file. Look

Re: [U-Boot] How to adapt top-level Makefile tricks to current boards.cfg

2010-09-02 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Detlev Zundel, In message you wrote: > > Ideally the configuration name (1st column) will be split into a base > configuration plus options which result in individual defines tha can be > used in the code. I think Wolfgang started to work on this, so I > especially ping him on this one. N

Re: [U-Boot] TFTP load for file over 50MB fails

2010-09-02 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear "StephenPaulraj Chinnadurai-ERS,HCLTech", In message you wrote: > > 1. When the board is connected to network, through tftp the u-boot > is downloading only 9 MB size file. When tried to download 10 MB size > file, the u-boot is displaying "Retry count exceeded; starting again" > message

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/7] Expand POST memory test to support arch-depended implementation.

2010-09-02 Thread Bas Mevissen
On Thu, 02 Sep 2010 09:48:06 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > And if we add such progress indicators, then we have > to make sure it integrates well with existing use. > One could define a global environment variable or command to enable or disable progress indicators. Just like "hash on" and "has

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/7] Expand POST memory test to support arch-depended implementation.

2010-09-02 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Scott Wood, In message <20100830144648.10446...@schlenkerla.am.freescale.net> you wrote: > > > POST is supposed to be an automatic, unmonitored functionality. > > Results are suposed to be reported through a mechanism compatible to > > Linux' syslog system. > > > > There is no place for prog

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] display_buffer: fix misaligned buffer

2010-09-02 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Reinhard Meyer, In message <4c7c9b85.6080...@emk-elektronik.de> you wrote: > > making the change to the union, I also realized that > > /* Copy from memory into linebuf and print hex values */ > for (i = 0; i < linelen; i++) { > uint32_t x; > if (width == 4) > x =