Re: [U-Boot] Does U-boot supports Spansion S29GL512P NOR Flash?

2010-04-12 Thread prakash bedge
Hi All, I did it. :) I am now able to detect the flash. So now I can run the uboot commnads i.e flinfo to check the flash information. For this I make use of ST fixup code for M29W128GH in which I changed the codition for chekcing chipwidth. To detect the flash I used chipwidth 16 Bits and Port

[U-Boot] u-boot compilation for MIPS Au1x00 board

2010-04-12 Thread Gurumurthy Gowdar
Hi all, I am compiling u-boot latest version for MIPS processor Au1350. When I compile I get the following error as mentioned below. mipsel-linux-ld: /opt/rmi-linux/db1300/lib/gcc/mipsel-linux/4.2.4/libgcc.a(_lshrdi3.o): compiled for a little endian system and target is big endian

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 19/20] nios2: Move cpu/nios2/* to arch/nios2/cpu/*

2010-04-12 Thread Peter Tyser
Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser --- {cpu/nios2 => arch/nios2/cpu}/Makefile |0 {cpu/nios2 => arch/nios2/cpu}/config.mk|0 {cpu/nios2 => arch/nios2/cpu}/cpu.c|0 {cpu/nios2 => arch/nios2/cpu}/epcs.c |0 {cpu/nios2 => arch/nios2/cpu}/exceptions.S |0 {cpu/nios2

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 18/20] nios: Move cpu/nios/* to arch/nios/cpu/*

2010-04-12 Thread Peter Tyser
Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser --- {cpu/nios => arch/nios/cpu}/Makefile |0 {cpu/nios => arch/nios/cpu}/asmi.c |0 {cpu/nios => arch/nios/cpu}/config.mk|0 {cpu/nios => arch/nios/cpu}/cpu.c|0 {cpu/nios => arch/nios/cpu}/interrupts.c |0 {cpu/nios => arch/nio

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 20/20] Update README to reflect new directory structure

2010-04-12 Thread Peter Tyser
Also fix up some whitespace issues that were introduced when moving directory locations. Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser --- README | 158 +--- 1 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-) diff --git a/README b/README index d5ccdc5..

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 11/20] m68k: Move cpu/$CPU to arch/m68k/cpu/$CPU

2010-04-12 Thread Peter Tyser
Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser --- {cpu => arch/m68k/cpu}/mcf5227x/Makefile |0 {cpu => arch/m68k/cpu}/mcf5227x/config.mk |0 {cpu => arch/m68k/cpu}/mcf5227x/cpu.c |0 {cpu => arch/m68k/cpu}/mcf5227x/cpu_init.c |0 {cpu => arch/m68k/cpu}/mcf5227x/interrupts.c

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 15/20] microblaze: Move cpu/microblaze/* to arch/microblaze/cpu/*

2010-04-12 Thread Peter Tyser
Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser --- {cpu/microblaze => arch/microblaze/cpu}/Makefile |0 {cpu/microblaze => arch/microblaze/cpu}/cache.c|0 {cpu/microblaze => arch/microblaze/cpu}/cpu.c |0 .../microblaze => arch/microblaze/cpu}/exception.c |0 .../microblaze/cpu}/interrupts

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 17/20] sparc: Move cpu/leon[23] to arch/sparc/cpu/leon[23]

2010-04-12 Thread Peter Tyser
Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser --- {cpu => arch/sparc/cpu}/leon2/Makefile |0 {cpu => arch/sparc/cpu}/leon2/config.mk|0 {cpu => arch/sparc/cpu}/leon2/cpu.c|0 {cpu => arch/sparc/cpu}/leon2/cpu_init.c |0 {cpu => arch/sparc/cpu}/leon2/interrupts.c |0 {cpu => arc

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 16/20] i386: Move cpu/i386/* to arch/i386/cpu/*

2010-04-12 Thread Peter Tyser
Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser --- {cpu/i386 => arch/i386/cpu}/Makefile|0 {cpu/i386 => arch/i386/cpu}/config.mk |0 {cpu/i386 => arch/i386/cpu}/cpu.c |0 {cpu/i386 => arch/i386/cpu}/interrupts.c|0 {cpu/i386 => arch/i386/cpu}/resetvec.S

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 12/20] blackfin: Move cpu/blackfin/* to arch/blackfin/cpu/*

2010-04-12 Thread Peter Tyser
Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser --- Makefile |2 +- {cpu/blackfin => arch/blackfin/cpu}/.gitignore |0 {cpu/blackfin => arch/blackfin/cpu}/Makefile |0 .../blackfin/cpu}/bootrom-asm-offsets.awk |0 .../blackfin/cpu}/bootrom-a

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 14/20] avr32: Move cpu/at32ap/* to arch/avr32/cpu/*

2010-04-12 Thread Peter Tyser
Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser --- {cpu/at32ap => arch/avr32/cpu}/Makefile|0 {cpu/at32ap => arch/avr32/cpu}/at32ap700x/Makefile |0 {cpu/at32ap => arch/avr32/cpu}/at32ap700x/clk.c|0 .../at32ap => arch/avr32/cpu}/at32ap700x/portmux.c |0 {cpu/at32ap => arch/avr32/cpu}

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 13/20] mips: Move cpu/mips/* to arch/mips/cpu/*

2010-04-12 Thread Peter Tyser
Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser --- {cpu/mips => arch/mips/cpu}/Makefile |0 {cpu/mips => arch/mips/cpu}/asc_serial.c |0 {cpu/mips => arch/mips/cpu}/asc_serial.h |0 {cpu/mips => arch/mips/cpu}/au1x00_eth.c |0 {cpu/mips => arch/mips/cpu}/au1x00_serial.c |

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 09/20] sh: Move cpu/$CPU to arch/sh/cpu/$CPU

2010-04-12 Thread Peter Tyser
Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser --- {cpu => arch/sh/cpu}/sh2/Makefile |0 {cpu => arch/sh/cpu}/sh2/cache.c |0 {cpu => arch/sh/cpu}/sh2/config.mk|0 {cpu => arch/sh/cpu}/sh2/cpu.c|0 {cpu => arch/sh/cpu}/sh2/interrupts.c |0 {cpu => arch/sh/cpu}/sh2/start.S

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 06/20] Replace "#include " with "#include "

2010-04-12 Thread Peter Tyser
The appropriate include/asm-$ARCH directory should already by symlinked to include/asm so using the whole "asm-$ARCH" path is unnecessary. This change should also allow us to move the include/asm-$ARCH directories into their appropriate lib/$ARCH/ directories. Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser --- boa

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 05/20] Move libfdt/ into lib/

2010-04-12 Thread Peter Tyser
Move the libfdt directory into the common lib/ directory to clean up the top-level directory. Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser --- Makefile |2 +- {libfdt => lib/libfdt}/Makefile |0 {libfdt => lib/libfdt}/README|0 {libfdt => lib/libfdt

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 00/20] Reorganize directory structure

2010-04-12 Thread Peter Tyser
This series reorganizes U-Boot's directory structure so that it looks like: /arch/$ARCH/ /lib/ /include/asm/ /cpu/ /config.mk (old lib_$ARCH/config.mk) /lib/ / /libfdt/ /lzma/ /lzo/ Patches 8 through 19 can be squashed if desired, I

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 02/20] Change directory-specific CFLAGS to use full path

2010-04-12 Thread Peter Tyser
Previously, a specific file or directory could be compiled with custom CFLAGS by adding a Makefile variable such as: CFLAGS_dlmalloc.o = or CFLAGS_lib = This method breaks down once multiple files or directories share the same path. Eg FLAGS_fileA = would incorrectly result in both dir1/fi

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 01/20] Create CPUDIR variable

2010-04-12 Thread Peter Tyser
The CPUDIR variable points to the location of a target's CPU directory. Currently, it is set to cpu/$CPU. However, using $CPUDIR will allow for more flexibility in the future. It lays the groundwork for reorganizing U-Boot's directory structure to support a layout such as: arch/$ARCH/cpu/$CPU/

[U-Boot] Uboot and mpc8536 - questions and confusions

2010-04-12 Thread Mark Pearson
Hi, First posting to this mailing list so apologies if I make any mailing list etiquette mistakes. I'm doing bring up on a new MPC8536 based board and hitting headaches and had a few questions. First off is any recommendations/advice on what version of uboot I should be using? I've got the uboot

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] pm9263 converted to at91 soc access

2010-04-12 Thread Tom
Asen Dimov wrote: > Signed-off-by: Asen Dimov > --- > board/ronetix/pm9263/led.c| 15 ++-- > board/ronetix/pm9263/pm9263.c | 195 > + > include/configs/pm9263.h | 82 - > 3 files changed, 146 insertions(+), 146 deletions(-) >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] pm9263: remove CONFIG_CMD_AUTOSCRIPT

2010-04-12 Thread Tom
Asen Dimov wrote: > Signed-off-by: Asen Dimov > --- > include/configs/pm9263.h |1 - > 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/configs/pm9263.h b/include/configs/pm9263.h > index 807dba8..f854f38 100644 > --- a/include/configs/pm9263.h > +++ b/include/config

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH/RFC] Fixup for directory reorganization patch series

2010-04-12 Thread Peter Tyser
On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 07:56 +1000, Graeme Russ wrote: > On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 6:21 AM, Peter Tyser wrote: > > Hi Wolfgang, > > > >> In message <1271045621-17393-1-git-send-email-pty...@xes-inc.com> you > >> wrote: > > [snip] > > >> > >> So far nobody else complained, so I think when you post

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH/RFC] Fixup for directory reorganization patch series

2010-04-12 Thread Graeme Russ
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 6:21 AM, Peter Tyser wrote: > Hi Wolfgang, > >> In message <1271045621-17393-1-git-send-email-pty...@xes-inc.com> you wrote: [snip] >> >> So far nobody else complained, so I think when you post the next >> version of this series I will apply it directly to "master". > > G

[U-Boot] [PATCH] [v4] allow print_size to print large numbers on 32-bit systems

2010-04-12 Thread Timur Tabi
Modify print_size() so that it can accept numbers larger than 4GB on 32-bit systems. Add support for display terabyte, petabyte, and exabyte sizes. Change the output to use International Electrotechnical Commission binary prefix standard. Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi --- optimized the loop. If I

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH/RFC] Fixup for directory reorganization patch series

2010-04-12 Thread Peter Tyser
Hi Wolfgang, > In message <1271045621-17393-1-git-send-email-pty...@xes-inc.com> you wrote: > > This patch fixes 2 issues with the original directory reorganization > > patchset: > > 1. It fixes the symlinking of the 'proc' directory in include/asm when > >building out-of-tree. > >Anyone k

[U-Boot] [PATCH] [v3] allow print_size to print large numbers on 32-bit systems

2010-04-12 Thread Timur Tabi
Modify print_size() so that it can accept numbers larger than 4GB on 32-bit systems. Add support for display terabyte, petabyte, and exabyte sizes. Change the output to use International Electrotechnical Commission binary prefix standard. Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi --- lib_generic/display_optio

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] [v2] allow print_size to print large numbers on 32-bit systems

2010-04-12 Thread Scott Wood
Timur Tabi wrote: > Modify print_size() so that it can accept numbers larger than 4GB on 32-bit > systems. > > Add support for display terabyte, petabyte, and exabyte sizes. Change the > output to use International Electrotechnical Commission binary prefix > standard. > > Signed-off-by: Timur T

[U-Boot] [PATCH] [v2] allow print_size to print large numbers on 32-bit systems

2010-04-12 Thread Timur Tabi
Modify print_size() so that it can accept numbers larger than 4GB on 32-bit systems. Add support for display terabyte, petabyte, and exabyte sizes. Change the output to use International Electrotechnical Commission binary prefix standard. Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi --- lib_generic/display_optio

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH/RFC] Fixup for directory reorganization patch series

2010-04-12 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Peter Tyser, In message <1271045621-17393-1-git-send-email-pty...@xes-inc.com> you wrote: > This patch fixes 2 issues with the original directory reorganization > patchset: > 1. It fixes the symlinking of the 'proc' directory in include/asm when >building out-of-tree. >Anyone know wha

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2]fsl_i2c: Add i2c_board_late_init

2010-04-12 Thread richardretanubun
>From de1623005ece04af9082f397759fe92cbae84211 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Richard Retanubun Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:08:17 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] fsl_i2c: Added a callpoint for i2c_board_late_init This patch adds a callpoint in i2c_init that allows board specific i2c board initialization (ty

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH]fsl_i2c: Add i2c_board_late_init

2010-04-12 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear richardretanu...@ruggedcom.com, In message <20100412191703.ga30...@richardretanubun.eng.lan> you wrote: > From d0d9e0df99ce9035db43ebcf9d48601fa6f096d4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Richard Retanubun > Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:08:17 -0400 > Subject: [PATCH] fsl_i2c: Added a callpoint for

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] allow print_size to print large numbers on 32-bit systems

2010-04-12 Thread Scott Wood
Timur Tabi wrote: > Wolfgang Denk wrote: >> For example, how big is (ummm: was) a standard 3.5" floppy disk? >> >> 1.44 MB, right? >> >> Well, actually it's 1474560 bytes, or 1440 * 1024 bytes. >> >> So this "MB" here is 1000 * 1024 - which is complete nonsense. > > This is bad example, because th

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH]fsl_i2c: Add i2c_board_late_init

2010-04-12 Thread richardretanubun
>From d0d9e0df99ce9035db43ebcf9d48601fa6f096d4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Richard Retanubun Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:08:17 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] fsl_i2c: Added a callpoint for i2c_board_late_init This patch adds a callpoint in i2c_init that allows board specific i2c board initialization (ty

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] allow print_size to print large numbers on 32-bit systems

2010-04-12 Thread Timur Tabi
Wolfgang Denk wrote: > For example, how big is (ummm: was) a standard 3.5" floppy disk? > > 1.44 MB, right? > > Well, actually it's 1474560 bytes, or 1440 * 1024 bytes. > > So this "MB" here is 1000 * 1024 - which is complete nonsense. This is bad example, because the size of a floppy is neithe

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] allow print_size to print large numbers on 32-bit systems

2010-04-12 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Timur Tabi, In message <4bc366de.1000...@freescale.com> you wrote: > > I guess my objection that I think the whole idea is stupid doesn't count for > much? I'll do it if Wolfgang insists, but I honestly believe that there was > no confusion and that the introduction of KiB and its ilk just

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH]fsl_i2c: Move i2c_board_init to after i2c_init operations

2010-04-12 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Richard, In message <4bc364d1.8020...@ruggedcom.com> you wrote: > > That is one of the options I put forth, what would be a name you like for > this callpoint? > > i2c_board_late_init ?? I think we agree that it's not exactly an elegant name, but given the fact that we already have board_

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] allow print_size to print large numbers on 32-bit systems

2010-04-12 Thread Timur Tabi
Scott Wood wrote: > It's used often enough (including many places in U-Boot already), and > there's typically enough context, that I don't think too many would be > confused. I guess my objection that I think the whole idea is stupid doesn't count for much? I'll do it if Wolfgang insists, but

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] allow print_size to print large numbers on 32-bit systems

2010-04-12 Thread Scott Wood
Timur Tabi wrote: > Wolfgang Denk wrote: >> We should use standardized names now, i. e. GiB, MiB, KiB, etc. > > Ugh. I'm not sure everyone recognizes those acronyms. I'm expecting a lot > of people to say, "What the hell is MiB? Men in Black?" It's used often enough (including many places in

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH]fsl_i2c: Move i2c_board_init to after i2c_init operations

2010-04-12 Thread Richard Retanubun
Wolfgang Denk wrote: > > If you need a late init function, then better add a new one. Hi Wolfgang, That is one of the options I put forth, what would be a name you like for this callpoint? i2c_board_late_init ?? - Richard ___ U-Boot mailing list U-

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] allow print_size to print large numbers on 32-bit systems

2010-04-12 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Timur Tabi, In message <4bc36057.30...@freescale.com> you wrote: > Wolfgang Denk wrote: > > We should use standardized names now, i. e. GiB, MiB, KiB, etc. > > Ugh. I'm not sure everyone recognizes those acronyms. I'm expecting a lot > of people to say, "What the hell is MiB? Men in Blac

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH]fsl_i2c: Move i2c_board_init to after i2c_init operations

2010-04-12 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear richardretanu...@ruggedcom.com, In message <20100412180215.ga11...@richardretanubun.eng.lan> you wrote: > From 00f84e4a9a2d13971c9328fc815825456b25f760 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Richard Retanubun > Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 13:32:09 -0400 > Subject: [PATCH] fsl_i2c: Move the call for i2c

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] allow print_size to print large numbers on 32-bit systems

2010-04-12 Thread Timur Tabi
Wolfgang Denk wrote: > We should use standardized names now, i. e. GiB, MiB, KiB, etc. Ugh. I'm not sure everyone recognizes those acronyms. I'm expecting a lot of people to say, "What the hell is MiB? Men in Black?" -- Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at Freescale _

[U-Boot] [PATCH]fsl_i2c: Move i2c_board_init to after i2c_init operations

2010-04-12 Thread richardretanubun
>From 00f84e4a9a2d13971c9328fc815825456b25f760 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Richard Retanubun Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 13:32:09 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] fsl_i2c: Move the call for i2c_init_board to the end of i2c_init This patch moved the call to i2c_init_board to the end of i2c_init. This allows

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] allow print_size to print large numbers on 32-bit systems

2010-04-12 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Nick Thompson, In message <4bc34758.3050...@ge.com> you wrote: > > > I'm working on it now. I did notice something odd, though. The > > strings for sizes are GB, MB, and kB. Why is the "k" lowercase? > > To differentiate from "K", which means 1000, rather than 1024. > Example Kg = 1000 gr

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] allow print_size to print large numbers on 32-bit systems

2010-04-12 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Timur Tabi, In message you wrote: > On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > > > If we make this change, we can probably use this function as well to > > print the size of storage devices like NAND, USB Mass Storage, hard > > disk drives, etc. =A0Eventually we can clean up s

Re: [U-Boot] Does U-boot supports Spansion S29GL512P NOR Flash?

2010-04-12 Thread Frank Svendsbøe
> ## Unknown FLASH on Bank 1 - Size = 0x = 0 MB > flash_protect ON: from 0xFFFC to 0xFFFE81FF > flash_protect ON: from 0xFFFA to 0xFFFB > *** failed *** > ### ERROR ### Please RESET the board ### > This is just a wild guess. Check that your memory controller setup is correct. S

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] PXA: Align stack to 8 bytes

2010-04-12 Thread Eric Miao
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: > Stack must be aligned to 8 bytes on PXA (possibly all armv5te) for LDRD/STRD > instructions. In case LDRD/STRD is issued on an unaligned address, the > behaviour > is undefined. > Well, I guess this is true for all ARMv5. ARMv6 and later howe

Re: [U-Boot] Does U-boot supports Spansion S29GL512P NOR Flash?

2010-04-12 Thread Frank Svendsbøe
>>> For slow devices, the memory controller is usually setup to use the GPCM. >>> Check your options and base registers >>> (OR0 and BR0). > What is GPCM? Which source/header file I need to check for these settings.? > Hi Prakash, I didn't know that a IBM PPC440 CPU didn't contain an embedded memo

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] allow print_size to print large numbers on 32-bit systems

2010-04-12 Thread Nick Thompson
On 12/04/10 17:21, Timur Tabi wrote: > Nick Thompson wrote: > >> To differentiate from "K", which means 1000, rather than 1024. > > I don't think that's correct. I understand the 1000/1024 debate, but my > understanding is that > > KB = 1000 bytes > KiB = 1024 bytes > > (personally, I think t

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] allow print_size to print large numbers on 32-bit systems

2010-04-12 Thread Timur Tabi
Nick Thompson wrote: > To differentiate from "K", which means 1000, rather than 1024. I don't think that's correct. I understand the 1000/1024 debate, but my understanding is that KB = 1000 bytes KiB = 1024 bytes (personally, I think the whole kibi-byte thing is stupid, and we should just sa

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] allow print_size to print large numbers on 32-bit systems

2010-04-12 Thread Nick Thompson
On 12/04/10 17:12, Timur Tabi wrote: > On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > >> If we make this change, we can probably use this function as well to >> print the size of storage devices like NAND, USB Mass Storage, hard >> disk drives, etc. Eventually we can clean up some pieces

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] allow print_size to print large numbers on 32-bit systems

2010-04-12 Thread Timur Tabi
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > If we make this change, we can probably use this function as well to > print the size of storage devices like NAND, USB Mass Storage, hard > disk drives, etc.  Eventually we can clean up some pieces of code > then... I'm working on it now.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] [v3] fix print_size printing fractional gigabyte numbers on 32-bit platforms

2010-04-12 Thread Timur Tabi
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Timur Tabi, > > In message <1269990179-23666-1-git-send-email-ti...@freescale.com> you wrote: >> In print_size(), the math that calculates the fractional remainder of a >> number >> used the same integer size as a physical address.  Howe

[U-Boot] U-boot Update feature with Nandflash support

2010-04-12 Thread Krishna Pattabiraman
Hi all, I am trying to implement a remote update feature for a at91sam9263ek board using tftp. basically i want to get this feature working with NAND flash similar to the link given below. http://www.denx.de/wiki/DULG/HowCanIImplementAutomaticSoftwareUpdates http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot.git;a=blob

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V6 1/3] Initial support for Marvell Orion5x SoC

2010-04-12 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
(apparently one of Prafulla's answers did not reach me; copy-pasting it and replying even though it's slightly out of place within the thread) Prafulla Wadaskar a écrit : > >> -Original Message- >> From: u-boot-bounces at lists.denx.de >> [mailto:u-boot-bounces at lists.denx.de] On Beha

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 3/3] TI: TNETV107X EVM initial support

2010-04-12 Thread Cyril Chemparathy
TNETV107X is a Texas Instruments SoC based on an ARM1176 core, and with a bunch on on-chip integrated peripherals. This patch adds support for the TNETV107X EVM board. Signed-off-by: Cyril Chemparathy --- v4: rebased on next in u-boot-arm.git (unchanged) v3: Added NAND MTDID comment in board con

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 0/3] TI: tnetv107x patch series

2010-04-12 Thread Cyril Chemparathy
TNETV107X is a Texas Instruments SoC based on an ARM1176 core, and with a bunch on on-chip integrated peripherals. This patch series generalizes current ARM1176 code to allow for the addition of new ARM1176 SOCs. The remaining patches in this series add arch and board support. The contents of th

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 1/3] ARM1176: Coexist with other ARM1176 platforms

2010-04-12 Thread Cyril Chemparathy
The current ARM1176 CPU specific code is too specific to the SMDK6400 architecture. The following changes were necessary prerequisites for the addition of other SoCs based on ARM1176. Existing board's (SMDK6400) configuration has been modified to keep behavior unchanged despite these changes. 1.

Re: [U-Boot] at91sam9g45ekes SDHC/MMC

2010-04-12 Thread Henry Súcart
Hi Ulf, Thanks for the reply. I applied your patches but I still can't get it to read the SD card Without the SD card: U-Boot> mmc init 0 mmc: command 55 failed (status: 0x0c100025) mmc: command 1 failed (status: 0x0c100025) No MMC card found With the SD card: U-Boot> mmc init 0 mmc: command 1 f

[U-Boot] Serial port initialization and multiplexing

2010-04-12 Thread harsh poshtiwala
Hi All, I have MPC8379 board. It has 2 serial ports. 1 is connected to the console, while the 2nd serial port is connected to another micro-controller. I would like to use both the serial port, how do I achieve this? As far as serial port configuration is concerned What should go in include/conf

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V6 1/3] Initial support for Marvell Orion5x SoC

2010-04-12 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Prafulla, In message you wrote: > > My re-confirmation discussion was w.r.to "GPL v2 or later" Thanks a lot for this confirmation. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groe

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V6 1/3] Initial support for Marvell Orion5x SoC

2010-04-12 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Prafulla Wadaskar a écrit : > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Wolfgang Denk [mailto:w...@denx.de] >> Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 4:16 PM >> To: Prafulla Wadaskar >> Cc: Albert ARIBAUD; U-Boot@lists.denx.de >> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V6 1/3] Initial support for >> Marvell Orion5x

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V6 3/3] Add support for the LaCie ED Mini V2 board

2010-04-12 Thread Prafulla Wadaskar
> -Original Message- > From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de > [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Prafulla Wadaskar > Sent: Friday, April 09, 2010 3:08 PM > To: Albert Aribaud; U-Boot@lists.denx.de > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V6 3/3] Add support for the > LaCie ED Mini

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V6 1/3] Initial support for Marvell Orion5x SoC

2010-04-12 Thread Prafulla Wadaskar
> -Original Message- > From: Wolfgang Denk [mailto:w...@denx.de] > Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 4:16 PM > To: Prafulla Wadaskar > Cc: Albert ARIBAUD; U-Boot@lists.denx.de > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V6 1/3] Initial support for > Marvell Orion5x SoC > > Dear Prafulla, > > In messag

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V6 1/3] Initial support for Marvell Orion5x SoC

2010-04-12 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Prafulla, In message you wrote: > > After re-confirmation with internal teams. > Yes, all the code that is going out from Marvell for U-boot + LSP > by any means is meant to be GPL, if something is missing that > can/should be corrected. "GPL" alone is not precise enough - it could mean "

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V6 1/3] Initial support for Marvell Orion5x SoC

2010-04-12 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Prafulla Wadaskar a écrit : > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Albert ARIBAUD [mailto:albert.arib...@free.fr] >> Sent: Sunday, April 11, 2010 1:12 PM >> To: Albert ARIBAUD >> Cc: Wolfgang Denk; U-Boot@lists.denx.de; Prafulla Wadaskar >> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V6 1/3] Initial suppo

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V6 1/3] Initial support for Marvell Orion5x SoC

2010-04-12 Thread Prafulla Wadaskar
> -Original Message- > From: Albert ARIBAUD [mailto:albert.arib...@free.fr] > Sent: Sunday, April 11, 2010 1:12 PM > To: Albert ARIBAUD > Cc: Wolfgang Denk; U-Boot@lists.denx.de; Prafulla Wadaskar > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V6 1/3] Initial support for > Marvell Orion5x SoC > > Alb

Re: [U-Boot] Does U-boot supports Spansion S29GL512P NOR Flash?

2010-04-12 Thread Stefan Roese
On Monday 12 April 2010 06:18:12 prakash bedge wrote: > >> Right. Most likely you just need to tune the chip select timing > >> registers > > And of course the size of the CS. > What mean by size of CS? Which file I should check for timing register for > S29GL512P? IIRC, then you have a custom PP

[U-Boot] [PATCH 4/4] mpc832x: add support for mpc8321 based tuda1 board

2010-04-12 Thread Heiko Schocher
This board is similar to suvd3 board. So most initialisation topics are taken from suvd3 (UART1, Ethernet, piggy PHY, flash, ram) only the application specific chip selects differ. Signed-off-by: Lukas Roggli Signed-off-by: Holger Brunck Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher --- MAINTAINERS

[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/4] mpc832x: add support for mpc8321 based tuxa1 board

2010-04-12 Thread Heiko Schocher
This board is similar to suvd3 board. So most initialisation topics are taken from suvd3 (UART1, Ethernet, piggy PHY, flash, ram) only the application specific chip selects differ. Signed-off-by: Lukas Roggli Signed-off-by: Holger Brunck Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher --- MAINTAINERS

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/4] mpc832x: add support for the mpc8321 based suvd3 board

2010-04-12 Thread Heiko Schocher
- serial console on UART1 - Ethernet RMII over UCC4 - PHY SMSC LAN8700 - 64MB Flash - 128 MB DDR2 RAM - I2C - bootcount This board is similiar to the kmeter1 (8360) board, so common config options are extracted into the include/configs/km83xx-common.h file. Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher --- MAI

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] keymile: rework headerfiles for keymile boards

2010-04-12 Thread Heiko Schocher
- This patch reworks all headerfiles for keymile boards (coge, supx4, eter1, suen3). Furthermore, a refactoring on the whole environment variables has been acomplished. - Environment variables: - grouped into logical blocks (#defines) based on the functionality/purpose - short descriptio

[U-Boot] [PATCH 0/4] Keymile rework headerfiles and support for 3 new 83xx based boards

2010-04-12 Thread Heiko Schocher
This series reorganizes the headerfiles for the boards manufactured by keymile, and based on this reorganization 3 new 83xx boards from keymile. The following changes since commit fd4e49c18901a50b1648235f26da1e8caa0f8764: Wolfgang Denk (1): Merge branch 'master' of git://git.denx.de/u-bo