Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3 v3] arm: A320: driver for FTMAC100 ethernet controller

2009-07-02 Thread Po-Yu Chuang
This patch adds an FTMAC100 Ethernet driver for Faraday A320 evaluation board. Signed-off-by: Po-Yu Chuang --- drivers/net/Makefile |1 + drivers/net/ftmac100.c | 278 drivers/net/ftmac100.h | 154 ++ include/netdev

[U-Boot] autoscr command

2009-07-02 Thread Berns
Hi, i use the autoscr command to store further information in a NAND at the first start. After this it modify the bootcmd and save the enviroment and the last command should restart the device. The script works fine but "saveenv" seams to abort the script file. I have used different memory locati

Re: [U-Boot] Need assistance with increasing command line size on Cavium

2009-07-02 Thread Frank Svendsbøe
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 2:49 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 7:06 AM, Detlev Zundel wrote: >> Hi Garrett, >> >>>     Our group is running into command line length issues with a number >>> of Cavium boards we have at our office (CN38xx, CN5xxx), and I was >>> wondering (apart from

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCHv2 3/3] A320: Add support for Faraday A320 evaluation board

2009-07-02 Thread Po-Yu Chuang
Dear all, 2009/7/3 Po-Yu Chuang : >> please check your patch with checkpatch.pl script. >> It would warn you about such code style errors. > > Do you mean no braces for single statement block? > Itcomes from linux coding style. > > I use Lindent -pcs which is suggested in u-boot coding style. > It

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH] Add support for Raidsonic ICYBOX NAS4220 board

2009-07-02 Thread Po-Yu Chuang
Dear Darius Augulis, 2009/7/1 Darius Augulis : > This board is based on Cortina Systems networking processor > CS3516. It has FA526 core, which is ARMv4 compatible. > Many SoC specific definitions may be used for similar > processors CS3512 and dual-core CS3518. This processor > family has Gemini

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3]: arm: Kirkwood: Fix compiler optimization bug for kwgbe_send

2009-07-02 Thread Prafulla Wadaskar
> -Original Message- > From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de > [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Simon Kagstrom > Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2009 6:32 PM > To: Simon Kagstrom > Cc: U-Boot ML > Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3]: arm: Kirkwood: Fix compiler > optimization bug for

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH/RFC 2/2]: arm: Kirkwood: Support for the OpenRD base board

2009-07-02 Thread Prafulla Wadaskar
> -Original Message- > From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de > [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Simon Kagstrom > Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2009 6:50 PM > To: U-Boot ML > Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH/RFC 2/2]: arm: Kirkwood: Support for > the OpenRD base board > > Support for

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH/RFC 0/2]: arm: Kirkwood: OpenRD base board support

2009-07-02 Thread Prafulla Wadaskar
> -Original Message- > From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de > [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Simon Kagstrom > Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2009 6:49 PM > To: U-Boot ML > Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH/RFC 0/2]: arm: Kirkwood: OpenRD base > board support > > Hello again! > > T

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH/RFC 1/2]: arm: Kirkwood: Split PHY-related initialization to a common file

2009-07-02 Thread Prafulla Wadaskar
> -Original Message- > From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de > [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Simon Kagstrom > Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2009 6:50 PM > To: Simon Kagstrom > Cc: U-Boot ML > Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH/RFC 1/2]: arm: Kirkwood: Split > PHY-related initializat

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/5]P2020RDB Removed CONFIG_NUM_CPUS for 85xx processor series.

2009-07-02 Thread Aggrwal Poonam-B10812
> -Original Message- > From: Peter Tyser [mailto:pty...@xes-inc.com] > Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2009 7:47 PM > To: Aggrwal Poonam-B10812 > Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/5]P2020RDB Removed > CONFIG_NUM_CPUS for 85xx processor series. > > On Thu, 2009-07-02 a

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/5]P2020RDB Removed CONFIG_NUM_CPUS for 85xx processor series.

2009-07-02 Thread Aggrwal Poonam-B10812
> -Original Message- > From: Kumar Gala [mailto:ga...@kernel.crashing.org] > Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2009 7:20 PM > To: Aggrwal Poonam-B10812 > Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/5]P2020RDB Removed > CONFIG_NUM_CPUS for 85xx processor series. > > > On Jul 2, 2

[U-Boot] Porting u-boot to new PPC440EP board

2009-07-02 Thread yangguang3501
Hi, I use a new board designing based on PPC440EP evaluating board, called yosemite. I use u-boot version 1.3.1. I reduce the SDRAM and Flash size to 128M and 16M, I do the porting works as decribed in th maillist"new board SDRAM conf",which you posted in last year. http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCHv2 3/3] A320: Add support for Faraday A320 evaluation board

2009-07-02 Thread Po-Yu Chuang
Darius Augulis, 2009/7/2 Darius Augulis : > Hi Po-Yu, > On 07/01/2009 02:13 PM, Po-Yu Chuang wrote: >> This patch adds support for A320 development board from Faraday. This >> board >> uses FA526 processor by default and has 512kB and 32MB NOR flash, 64M RAM. >> FA526 is an ARMv4 processor and use

Re: [U-Boot] Need assistance with increasing command line size on Cavium

2009-07-02 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 7:06 AM, Detlev Zundel wrote: > Hi Garrett, > >>     Our group is running into command line length issues with a number >> of Cavium boards we have at our office (CN38xx, CN5xxx), and I was >> wondering (apart from the Linux kernel command line length), where I >> would look

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4] compiler.h: unify system ifdef cruft here

2009-07-02 Thread Mike Frysinger
Shove a lot of the HOSTCC and related #ifdef checking crap into the new compiler.h header so that we can keep all other headers nice and clean. Also introduce custom uswap functions so we don't have to rely on the non standard implementations that a host may (or may not in the case of OS X) provid

Re: [U-Boot] U-book and GPLv3? (fwd)

2009-07-02 Thread Pink Boy
Robin Getz sez, > Assuming that the _licensed_ amateur could modify the phone enough > that it _could_ operate on frequencies allocated for amateur use. > The only thing that would be potentially close is a European GSM phone: > Rx Tx > E-GSM-900 880.0–915.0 925.0–960.0

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] OMAP3 Fix compiler warning for v7_flush_dcache_all

2009-07-02 Thread Tom
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > On 15:04 Tue 30 Jun , Tom Rix wrote: > >> On build of omap3 targets in MAKEALL, the *.ERR files have >> >> cpu.c: In function 'cleanup_before_linux': >> cpu.c:64: warning: implicit declaration of function 'v7_flush_dcache_all' >> cpu.c:64: warning: i

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/4 v2] Clean up the Nomadik board and add OneNand

2009-07-02 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 11:18 Mon 22 Jun , Alessandro Rubini wrote: > This patch-set cleans up some glitches in my first submission. > I posted it as a single patch and a separate timer patch. The first one is > split as JC asked, and the timer patch is there as well since it is > conceptually in the same set, alth

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] OMAP3 Fix compiler warning for v7_flush_dcache_all

2009-07-02 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 15:04 Tue 30 Jun , Tom Rix wrote: > On build of omap3 targets in MAKEALL, the *.ERR files have > > cpu.c: In function 'cleanup_before_linux': > cpu.c:64: warning: implicit declaration of function 'v7_flush_dcache_all' > cpu.c:64: warning: implicit declaration of function 'get_device_type >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 6/6] MX31: Add NAND SPL boot support to i.MX31 PDK board.

2009-07-02 Thread Scott Wood
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: Scott what do you think? >>> I don't think we should do anything differently from the rest of U-Boot >>> here. >> Well, that's not easy since the rest of U-boot does it in different >> ways, i.e. some boards have the debug stuff and some don't. As an >>

Re: [U-Boot] loading via jtag

2009-07-02 Thread Frank Svendsbøe
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 3:32 PM, E Robertson wrote: > On Thursday 02 July 2009 02:22:16 am Frank Svendsbøe wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 6:10 AM, E Robertson > wrote: >> > Hi All, >> > Has anyone used the JTAG like the BDI2000 to load u-boot onto a >> > at91sam9263? I've done it on other boards b

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 6/6] MX31: Add NAND SPL boot support to i.MX31 PDK board.

2009-07-02 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 07:48 Wed 01 Jul , Magnus Lilja wrote: > Hi > > 2009/6/30 Scott Wood : > > Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > > > > +ifeq ($(debug),1) > > +PLATFORM_CPPFLAGS += -DDEBUG > > +endif > > I do not think it's board specific > >>> > >>> And what does that comment

Re: [U-Boot] loading via jtag

2009-07-02 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 08:32 Thu 02 Jul , E Robertson wrote: > On Thursday 02 July 2009 02:22:16 am Frank Svendsbøe wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 6:10 AM, E Robertson > wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > Has anyone used the JTAG like the BDI2000 to load u-boot onto a > > > at91sam9263? I've done it on other boards bu

Re: [U-Boot] U-book and GPLv3? (fwd)

2009-07-02 Thread Jean-Christian de Rivaz
Robin Getz a écrit : > On Thu 2 Jul 2009 09:56, Richard Stallman pondered: >> This clause is not an exception to the requirement for installation >> information. Cell phones must offer installation information just like >> other User Products. > > Right - but the cell phone provider should have t

[U-Boot] [PATCH] MIIPHYBB: Return 0xFFFF if the PHY is not asserting TA.

2009-07-02 Thread Richard Retanubun
From d4c7dd98ac9a3f6fc4949079b84d7d811376cf3d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Richard Retanubun Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 13:12:03 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] MIIPHYBB: Return 0x if the PHY is not asserting TA. This patch sets the returned value to 0x if the PHY does not exist and does not assert

Re: [U-Boot] NAND boot for mpc8536ds

2009-07-02 Thread Scott Wood
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 02:46:17PM +0200, Stefan Bohne wrote: > Hello, everyone, > > I have to set up a customized board based on the mpc8536ds which boots from > nand flash. I'm new to U-Boot and PowerPCs, but I understand that most of > the necessary code is already there in U-Boot and that the

Re: [U-Boot] U-book and GPLv3? (fwd)

2009-07-02 Thread Robin Getz
On Thu 2 Jul 2009 12:11, Larry Johnson pondered: > > In the United States, most radio transmitters must be type accepted > (certified) by the Federal Communications Commission. Modification > voids the type acceptance, so operating a modified mobile phone on its > original frequencies would be ill

[U-Boot] Is i.MX35 support in U-Boot under development?

2009-07-02 Thread Mark Craske
There is no i.MX35 support in U-Boot 2009.06 as far as I can see. Is it under development? -- Mark Craske MontaVista Software Ltd ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 12/12] 83xx: Add support for fsl_dma driver

2009-07-02 Thread Kumar Gala
On Jun 30, 2009, at 5:15 PM, Peter Tyser wrote: > Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser > Reviewed-by: Ira W. Snyder > Tested-by: Ira W. Snyder > --- > cpu/mpc83xx/cpu.c| 85 > -- > cpu/mpc83xx/spd_sdram.c | 40 ++-- > drivers/d

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 11/12] 83xx: Replace CONFIG_ECC_INIT_VIA_DDRC references

2009-07-02 Thread Kumar Gala
On Jun 30, 2009, at 5:15 PM, Peter Tyser wrote: > Update 83xx architecture's CONFIG_ECC_INIT_VIA_DDRC references to > CONFIG_ECC_INIT_VIA_DDRCONTROLLER, which other Freescale architectures > use > > Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser > --- > board/freescale/mpc8360emds/mpc8360emds.c |4 ++-- > board/

Re: [U-Boot] U-book and GPLv3? (fwd)

2009-07-02 Thread Larry Johnson
Robin Getz wrote: > On Thu 2 Jul 2009 09:56, Richard Stallman pondered: >> > Access to a network may be denied when the modification itself >> > materially and adversely affects the operation of the network >> > or violates the rules and protocols for communication across >> > the n

Re: [U-Boot] U-book and GPLv3? (fwd)

2009-07-02 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thursday 02 July 2009 10:44:39 Jon Smirl wrote: > On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Richard Stallman wrote: > >about a possibility which has already outworn itself (like DRM media, > >which seem to be getting more and more unpolular)? > > > > I wish we could regard DRM as a fading threat.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 11/12] 83xx: Replace CONFIG_ECC_INIT_VIA_DDRC references

2009-07-02 Thread Kim Phillips
On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 23:12:52 -0500 Kumar Gala wrote: > > On Jun 30, 2009, at 5:15 PM, Peter Tyser wrote: > > > Update 83xx architecture's CONFIG_ECC_INIT_VIA_DDRC references to > > CONFIG_ECC_INIT_VIA_DDRCONTROLLER, which other Freescale architectures > > use > > > > Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser

Re: [U-Boot] U-book and GPLv3? (fwd)

2009-07-02 Thread Robin Getz
On Thu 2 Jul 2009 09:56, Richard Stallman pondered: > > > Access to a network may be denied when the modification itself > > materially and adversely affects the operation of the network > > or violates the rules and protocols for communication across > > the network. > > The

Re: [U-Boot] U-book and GPLv3? (fwd)

2009-07-02 Thread Jon Smirl
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Richard Stallman wrote: >    about a possibility which has already outworn itself (like DRM media, >    which seem to be getting more and more unpolular)? > > I wish we could regard DRM as a fading threat.  In music we see a > retreat from DRM, but in e-books the thr

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/5]P2020RDB Removed CONFIG_NUM_CPUS for 85xx processor series.

2009-07-02 Thread Peter Tyser
On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 16:15 +0530, Poonam Aggrwal wrote: > Instead the num of cores is determined dynamically by reading the SVR values. > This can help to use the same u-boot image across the platforms. > > Added CONFIG_MAX_CPUS value 8. > > Also revamped and corrected few Freescale Copyright me

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/5] P2020RDB Platform support added.

2009-07-02 Thread Kumar Gala
> > > index acec1a0..21eb424 100644 > --- a/Makefile > +++ b/Makefile > @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ > # > +# Copyright (C) 2009 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All rights > reserved. > # (C) Copyright 2000-2009 > # Wolfgang Denk, DENX Software Engineering, w...@denx.de. > # > @@ -2491,6 +2492,13 @@ P2020DS_con

Re: [U-Boot] U-book and GPLv3? (fwd)

2009-07-02 Thread Richard Stallman
> While I probably would not want to change my glucometer, the practice > of designing hardware so that people cannot change it is becoming more > and more of a threat to our freedom in general. Can you be a bit more specific on this? Which devices are you aware of, that use GP

Re: [U-Boot] U-book and GPLv3? (fwd)

2009-07-02 Thread Richard Stallman
> As it happens, Bison can also be used to develop non-free programs. This is > because we decided to explicitly permit the use of the Bison standard > parser program in Bison output files without restriction. We made the > decision because there were other tools comparable to Biso

Re: [U-Boot] U-book and GPLv3? (fwd)

2009-07-02 Thread Richard Stallman
> Access to a network may be denied when the modification itself materially > and adversely affects the operation of the network or violates the rules > and protocols for communication across the network. The way I read that is that it is the unit you are on will have it's radio

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/5]P2020RDB Removed CONFIG_NUM_CPUS for 85xx processor series.

2009-07-02 Thread Kumar Gala
On Jul 2, 2009, at 5:45 AM, Poonam Aggrwal wrote: > Instead the num of cores is determined dynamically by reading the > SVR values. > This can help to use the same u-boot image across the platforms. > > Added CONFIG_MAX_CPUS value 8. > > Also revamped and corrected few Freescale Copyright messa

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5]P2020RDB Second UART port added for MPC85xx, MPC83xx, MPC86xx processors

2009-07-02 Thread Kumar Gala
On Jul 2, 2009, at 5:45 AM, Poonam Aggrwal wrote: > Defining the next two configs allows to switch the serial port from > the console using the setenv stdin and stdout > 1. #define CONFIG_SERIAL_MULTI 1 /* Enable both serial ports */ > 2. #define CONFIG_SYS_CONSOLE_IS_IN_ENV /* determin

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/5]P2020RDB Adds GPIO registers to MPC85xx Memory Map.

2009-07-02 Thread Kumar Gala
On Jul 2, 2009, at 5:44 AM, Poonam Aggrwal wrote: > Signed-off-by: Poonam Aggrwal > --- > include/asm-ppc/immap_85xx.h | 11 +++ > 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) applied - k ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de htt

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/5]P2020RDB Added support of Vitesse PHYs VSC8641(RGMII) and VSC8221(SGMII)

2009-07-02 Thread Kumar Gala
On Jul 2, 2009, at 5:45 AM, Poonam Aggrwal wrote: > These PHYs are on P2020RDB platform. > > Also revamped Freescale copyright message in drivers/net/tsec.c. > > Signed-off-by: Poonam Aggrwal > --- > drivers/net/tsec.c | 52 +++ > - > 1 files cha

Re: [U-Boot] loading via jtag

2009-07-02 Thread E Robertson
On Thursday 02 July 2009 02:22:16 am Frank Svendsbøe wrote: > On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 6:10 AM, E Robertson wrote: > > Hi All, > > Has anyone used the JTAG like the BDI2000 to load u-boot onto a > > at91sam9263? I've done it on other boards but some some reason the > > code will not execute > > from

[U-Boot] [PATCH/RFC 2/2]: arm: Kirkwood: Support for the OpenRD base board

2009-07-02 Thread Simon Kagstrom
Support for the OpenRD base board The implementation is borrowed from the sheevaplug board and the Marvell 1.1.4 code and likely to be a bit incomplete. GPIO pins are configured, but not really tested. Signed-off-by: Simon Kagstrom --- Makefile|3 + board/Mar

[U-Boot] [PATCH/RFC 1/2]: arm: Kirkwood: Split PHY-related initialization to a common file

2009-07-02 Thread Simon Kagstrom
Split PHY-related initialization to a common file The mv881116 PHY initialization is split out to a common file to enable code reuse between different boards. Signed-off-by: Simon Kagstrom --- board/Marvell/common/mv881116.c | 65 + board/Marvell/common/m

[U-Boot] [PATCH/RFC 0/2]: arm: Kirkwood: OpenRD base board support

2009-07-02 Thread Simon Kagstrom
Hello again! These two patches add board support for the OpenRD base board. They are a bit on the RFC-level, but allow me to get a prompt at least. Open issues: - Copyright and author: As you can see, most of the work in the new files comes from Prafullas sheevaplug stuff. Perhaps Prafulla shou

[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3]: arm: Kirkwood: See to it that sent data is 8-byte aligned

2009-07-02 Thread Simon Kagstrom
See to it that sent data is 8-byte aligned U-boot might use non-8-byte-aligned addresses for sending data, which the kwgbe_send doesn't accept (bootp does this for me). This patch copies the data to be sent to a temporary buffer if it is non-aligned. Signed-off-by: Simon Kagstrom --- drivers/ne

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3]: arm: Kirkwood: Check the error summary bit for error detection

2009-07-02 Thread Simon Kagstrom
Check the error summary bit for error detection The Marvell documentation for the 88f6281 states that the error coding is only valid if the error summary and last frame bits in the transmit descriptor status field are set. This patch adds checks for these for transmit (I would get transmit errors

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3]: arm: Kirkwood: Fix compiler optimization bug for kwgbe_send

2009-07-02 Thread Simon Kagstrom
Fix compiler optimization bug for kwgbe_send kwgbe_send/recv both have loops waiting for the hardware to set a bit. GCC 4.3.3 cleverly optimizes the send case to ... a while(1); loop. This patch makes the structure volatile to force re-loading of the transmit descriptor. Signed-off-by: Simon Kag

[U-Boot] [PATCH 0/3]: arm: Kirkwood: Various egiga send fixes

2009-07-02 Thread Simon Kagstrom
Hi! These three patches fix a few issues I've had with sending data on the network interface on the OpenRD base board. In summary, they do: - Fix compiler optimization bug in kwgbe_send - Check the error summary bit during send - Allow sending data which is not 8-byte aligned // Simon __

[U-Boot] NAND boot for mpc8536ds

2009-07-02 Thread Stefan Bohne
Hello, everyone, I have to set up a customized board based on the mpc8536ds which boots from nand flash. I'm new to U-Boot and PowerPCs, but I understand that most of the necessary code is already there in U-Boot and that the mpc8536ds configuration has to be extended to support nand boot. Could y

[U-Boot] FW: [PATCH] zlib: updated to v.1.2.3

2009-07-02 Thread Giuseppe CONDORELLI
Hi All, are there some news about the patch in subject? Best regards, Giuseppe ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] PalmTC support

2009-07-02 Thread Marek Vasut
Dne Čt 2. července 2009 13:21:10 Anatolij Gustschin napsal(a): > Marek Vasut wrote: > > Dne Čt 2. července 2009 09:08:43 Anatolij Gustschin napsal(a): > > ... > > >>> The patch is available here (it's not all that hacky anymore): > >> > >> patches for inclusion must be sent to the list. The merge w

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] PalmTC support

2009-07-02 Thread Anatolij Gustschin
Marek Vasut wrote: > Dne Čt 2. července 2009 09:08:43 Anatolij Gustschin napsal(a): ... >>> The patch is available here (it's not all that hacky anymore): >> patches for inclusion must be sent to the list. The merge window >> for next release is open until Sun Jul 19, 2009. >> See also http://www.

[U-Boot] [PATCH 5/5] P2020RDB Platform support added.

2009-07-02 Thread Poonam Aggrwal
The code base is generic to add more P1_P2 RDB platforms support as and when required. The folder and file names are such that they can cater to future SOCs of P1/P2 family. Tested the following on P2020RDB: 1. eTSECs(1/2/3) 2. DDR, NAND, NOR, I2C etc Signed-off-by: Poonam Aggrwal --- MAINTA

[U-Boot] [PATCH 4/5]P2020RDB Removed CONFIG_NUM_CPUS for 85xx processor series.

2009-07-02 Thread Poonam Aggrwal
Instead the num of cores is determined dynamically by reading the SVR values. This can help to use the same u-boot image across the platforms. Added CONFIG_MAX_CPUS value 8. Also revamped and corrected few Freescale Copyright messages. Signed-off-by: Poonam Aggrwal --- common/cmd_mp.c

[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/5]P2020RDB Added support of Vitesse PHYs VSC8641(RGMII) and VSC8221(SGMII)

2009-07-02 Thread Poonam Aggrwal
These PHYs are on P2020RDB platform. Also revamped Freescale copyright message in drivers/net/tsec.c. Signed-off-by: Poonam Aggrwal --- drivers/net/tsec.c | 52 +++- 1 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/tse

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5]P2020RDB Second UART port added for MPC85xx, MPC83xx, MPC86xx processors

2009-07-02 Thread Poonam Aggrwal
Defining the next two configs allows to switch the serial port from the console using the setenv stdin and stdout 1. #define CONFIG_SERIAL_MULTI 1 /* Enable both serial ports */ 2. #define CONFIG_SYS_CONSOLE_IS_IN_ENV /* determine from environment */ Signed-off-by: Poonam Aggrwal Sign

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/5]P2020RDB Adds GPIO registers to MPC85xx Memory Map.

2009-07-02 Thread Poonam Aggrwal
Signed-off-by: Poonam Aggrwal --- include/asm-ppc/immap_85xx.h | 11 +++ 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/asm-ppc/immap_85xx.h b/include/asm-ppc/immap_85xx.h index db2bdf0..0efef05 100644 --- a/include/asm-ppc/immap_85xx.h +++ b/include/asm-ppc/imm

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/6] Poseidon Board Support (Vivek)

2009-07-02 Thread Tom
Do you have a link to the announcement of the board ? Is it publically available ? Tom VIVEK DALAL wrote: > Hi Tom > > On Jul 02, 2009 00:18 (GMT+09:00) tom@windriver.com wrote : > > >> A large part of your changes are reorganizing omap24xx support. >> Have you looked at how it is already

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] PalmTC support

2009-07-02 Thread Marek Vasut
Dne Čt 2. července 2009 09:08:43 Anatolij Gustschin napsal(a): > Hi, > > Marek Vasut wrote: > > I'd like to get this patch in. It adds support for Palm Tungsten|C (a > > pxa255 based handheld device). > > > > The patch is available here (it's not all that hacky anymore): > > patches for inclusion m

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Add suport for the graphic controller included in the JADE SOC

2009-07-02 Thread Anatolij Gustschin
Matthias Weisser wrote: Anatolij Gustschin schrieb am 01.07.2009 um 15:40: >> Dear Matthias, >> >> Thanks for this patch! Please see some comments/issues below which > we >> should resolve before committing the driver. > > First of all thanks for your detailed comments. I fix them all before

Re: [U-Boot] U-book and GPLv3? (fwd)

2009-07-02 Thread Pink Boy
Robin Getz sez, > This is in no way trying to interperate the GPL3 for others (that is for > lawyers to do) - but just a question from an interested developer - to me - > it seems like tivo all over again. All Tivo needs to do is just make the > network a piece of their application - and they

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCHv2 3/3] A320: Add support for Faraday A320 evaluation board

2009-07-02 Thread Darius Augulis
Hi Po-Yu, On 07/01/2009 02:13 PM, Po-Yu Chuang wrote: > This patch adds support for A320 development board from Faraday. This board > uses FA526 processor by default and has 512kB and 32MB NOR flash, 64M RAM. > FA526 is an ARMv4 processor and uses the ARM920T source in this patch. It's very inter

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: Kirkwood: Add memory barriers to kwgbe_send/recv

2009-07-02 Thread Prafulla Wadaskar
> -Original Message- > From: Simon Kagstrom [mailto:simon.kagst...@netinsight.net] > Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2009 12:17 PM > To: Prafulla Wadaskar > Cc: U-Boot ML > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: Kirkwood: Add memory > barriers to kwgbe_send/recv > > On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 09:57:10 -

Re: [U-Boot] loading via jtag

2009-07-02 Thread Frank Svendsbøe
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 6:10 AM, E Robertson wrote: > Hi All, > Has anyone used the JTAG like the BDI2000 to load u-boot onto a > at91sam9263? I've done it on other boards but some some reason the > code will not execute > from on board SDRAM. To avoid initializing the external memory via > jtag, I

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] PalmTC support

2009-07-02 Thread Anatolij Gustschin
Hi, Marek Vasut wrote: > I'd like to get this patch in. It adds support for Palm Tungsten|C (a pxa255 > based handheld device). > > The patch is available here (it's not all that hacky anymore): patches for inclusion must be sent to the list. The merge window for next release is open until Sun