Dieter,
On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 17:46 +0200, Dieter Kiermaier wrote:
> Hello List,
>
> I want to boot a (Lattice) FPGA from u-boot by using Slave Serial
> configuration on a Marvell Kirkwood device.
Should be no problem as long as you'll have access to GPIO.
> As seen there is an (Xilinx and Alt
Dear Stefan,
having this patch in mainline [1] now, I have some issues with it. I
use omap3_beagle_config (ARM). There was already a short discussion
with Wolfgang on IRC regarding this, he directed my to you ;) I
identified three topics, two minor and one major one:
Stefan Roese wrote:
> This
On 22:54 Thu 18 Jun , Alessandro Rubini wrote:
> From: Alessandro Rubini
>
> This patch cleans up some glitches in the initial submission:
>- nobody calls it "nmdk8815": the board is "nhk8815", so rename
>- nand and onenand can coexist, so fix config file accordingly
>- configure
Dear Johan,
In message you
wrote:
> Seems like that was the trick. After removing the breakout board it
> works much better.
>
> I still got some problems which I don't know if its software related.
> Sometimes when I power on the board the ethernet LEDs does not turn
> green and the network do
> Where can i find the MX35-3-Stack patches? Does it support boot from
> NAND and does it have the NAND flash driver already?
Are you talking about this in the GIT?
http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-v2.git;a=tree;f=board;h=1b079f6910333c85920da3331cc93675447695d7;hb=aec91d05374bd4a0babc0d6ad2e4e
> We have support for the MX35-3-Stack, you might want to have a look at
> that code if you are working into that direction.
Where can i find the MX35-3-Stack patches? Does it support boot from
NAND and does it have the NAND flash driver already?
Thanks,
Alfred
There's only one thing about U-Boot that doesn't seem so good:
U-Boot is GPLv2 (sometimes "or later").
To have some parts which are GPLv2 only is unfortunate.
Is there any chance of convincing those authors to change that?
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-
Dear "kevin.morf...@fearnside-systems.co.uk",
In message <4a3bc007.4060...@fearnside-systems.co.uk> you wrote:
> This is the second of two patches that will add support for the Embest
> SBC2440-II Board. This one adds the new code for the Embest SBC2440-II Board.
> Tested on an Embest SBC2440-II
Dear "kevin.morf...@fearnside-systems.co.uk",
In message <4a3bc001.3010...@fearnside-systems.co.uk> you wrote:
> This is the first of two patches that will add support for the Embest
> SBC2440-II Board. This one adds generic support for the S3C2440 CPU. Tested by
> running MAKEALL for ARM9 boards
From: Alessandro Rubini
This sets CONFIG_SYS_HZ to 1000 as required, and completely rewrites
timer code, which is now both correct and much smaller. Unused
functions like udelay_masked() have been removed as no driver uses
them, even the ones that are not currently active for this board.
Signed
On Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:10:52 -0500
Timur Tabi wrote:
> The KSEG1ADDR macro used to be necessary for the RTL8139 Ethernet driver, but
> the code that used that macro was removed over a year ago, so board
> configuration files no longer need to define it.
>
> The _IO_BASE macro is also automatical
The KSEG1ADDR macro used to be necessary for the RTL8139 Ethernet driver, but
the code that used that macro was removed over a year ago, so board
configuration files no longer need to define it.
The _IO_BASE macro is also automatically defined to 0 if it isn't already set,
so there's no need to de
Kim Phillips wrote:
>> -#define _IO_BASE0xfe00 /* points to PCI I/O space
>> */
>> -
>
> but the PN62 doesn't set it to 0!
Doh! I don't know how I missed that.
--
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale
___
U-Boot m
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:34:55 -0500
Timur Tabi wrote:
> The _IO_BASE macro is also automatically defined to 0 if it isn't already set,
> so there's no need to define that macro either in the board configuration
> files.
...
> +++ b/include/configs/PN62.h
> @@ -133,8 +133,6 @@
> #define CONFIG_
I've been using gdb with u-boot via openocd. I'm sure others are doing
something similar, but I did a quick entry on what I'm doing. Maybe someone
else will find it usefull.
http://openhardware.wordpress.com/2009/06/19/u-boot-gdb/
thanks,
Paul
___
U-Boo
This is the second of two patches that will add support for the Embest
SBC2440-II Board. This one adds the new code for the Embest SBC2440-II Board.
Tested on an Embest SBC2440-II Board with u-boot in NOR flash, using tftp to
copy kernel and root file system images from a tftp server, programmin
This is the first of two patches that will add support for the Embest
SBC2440-II Board. This one adds generic support for the S3C2440 CPU. Tested by
running MAKEALL for ARM9 boards - no new warnings or errors were found.
This patch set assumes that the following patches have already been applied
Hello List,
I want to boot a (Lattice) FPGA from u-boot by using Slave Serial
configuration on a Marvell Kirkwood device.
As seen there is an (Xilinx and Altera) FPGA loader driver allready available
in u-boot.
Please can somebody explain how I have to provide a FPGA bitstream
image to u-boot?
I
On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 17:17 -0500, Andy Fleming wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:34:55 -0500
> > Timur Tabi wrote:
> >
> > > The KSEG1ADDR macro used to be necessary for the RTL8139 Ethernet driver,
> > but
> > > the code that used
Prafulla Wadaskar wrote:
>> Scott what is status for you?
> Hi Scott,
> I have re-posted this driver twice.. Any updates on this?
Sorry, I was out the previous week and have been busy catching up this past
week. I'll try to get to the stack of pending NAND stuff soon.
-Scott
___
2009/6/19 André Schwarz :
> MVBLM7 is mpc8343 ... please apply your patch.
I posted another version of my patch that include MVBLM7. Please ACK
that patch.
--
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
Dear Ansujit,
In message <24107715.p...@talk.nabble.com> you wrote:
>
> I have a ARM board STR710FZ2T6, and I want to build u-boot for it, so I
> downloaded the latest u-boot source,but it has not included STR710FZ2T6.So
> can anyone tell me how to modify u-boot for STR710FZ2T6.
There is a "P
This patch fixes the access to the 'ehci' struct elements which should
have been taken care off in 4ef01010aa4799c759d75e67007fdd3a38c88c8a
Sorry about that.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Mahajan
---
drivers/usb/host/ehci-fsl.c | 18 +-
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 13:31 -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Kim Phillips wrote:
>
> > it's missing other boards like the MVBLM7, mpc7448hpc2...
>
> I'm not familiar with those boards, so I didn't touch them. If you give me a
> list of which boards I should add, I can post an updated version of the p
Hi
Please let me know how to add new files in u boot.
Thanks
Sada
Please do not print this email unless it is absolutely necessary.
The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to
this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may
contain
Hi Detlev,
RGB555 is a wiring with blue and red swapped, nothing more.
Maybe I've made too much confusion before.
And in the at91 eks there's nothing to change, because they're wired as
BGR555.
Best regards
--
Giulio Benetti
R&D
Micronova srl
___
U-B
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Dieter Kiermaier [mailto:dk-arm-li...@gmx.de]
> > Sent: Friday, June 19, 2009 3:17 PM
> > To: Prafulla Wadaskar
> > Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] Marvell Kirkwood newbie question GPIO functions
> >
> > Prafulla,
> >
> > (...deleted some
> -Original Message-
> From: Dieter Kiermaier [mailto:dk-arm-li...@gmx.de]
> Sent: Friday, June 19, 2009 3:17 PM
> To: Prafulla Wadaskar
> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] Marvell Kirkwood newbie question GPIO functions
>
> Prafulla,
>
> (...deleted some stuff...)
> >
On Monday 15 June 2009 05:02:42 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > is there a reason to keep ENV_IS_EMBEDDED around ? i see a few places
> > that use CONFIG_ENV_IS_EMBEDDED, but it seems to be largely useless at
> > the moment as the define doesn't really do anything without
> > ENV_
Prafulla,
(...deleted some stuff...)
> > > What patches are in the pipeline?
>
> Some other board supports (MV88F6281GTW_GE) and Kirkwood SPI driver support
> Kirkwood USB support (at this moment)
>
Also very interesting :)
(...deleted, too...)
> >
> > What I forgot to mention is the i2c driver i
On Tuesday 16 June 2009 14:02:16 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > Rather than rely on dirty hacks to compile the environment on the host
> > and extract the CRC from that, have envcrc extract the environment
> > straight from the ELF object that will be linked into u-boot itself.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Prafulla Wadaskar [mailto:prafu...@marvell.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 08, 2009 5:35 PM
> To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Cc: Nicolas Pitre; Manas Saksena; Lennert Buijtenhek;
> Prabhanjan Sarnaik; Ronen Shitrit; Ashish Karkare; Prafulla Wadaskar
> Subject: [PATCH v
> -Original Message-
> From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD [mailto:plagn...@jcrosoft.com]
> Sent: Saturday, June 13, 2009 7:32 PM
> To: Prafulla Wadaskar
> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Manas Saksena; Ronen Shitrit;
> Nicolas Pitre; Ashish Karkare; Prabhanjan Sarnaik; Lennert
> Buijten
> -Original Message-
> From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de
> [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Dieter Kiermaier
> Sent: Friday, June 19, 2009 2:23 PM
> To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] Marvell Kirkwood newbie question GPIO functions
>
> Hi again,
>
>
>
Hello Tom,
Tom Rix wrote:
> The i2c patch is a cleaned up version of the one I RFC-ed to the list
> earlier. It addresses Nishanth's concerns by using the kernel's algorithm
> and by making the major parameters overridable by a board config.
> Jean's request for no weak function is addressed by
Hi
2009/6/19 Ulrich Gerster :
> Hi everybody
> and especially developers of i.MX31 NAND boot patches,
>
> I wrote an e-mail yesterday asking about the need of the mx31_nand.c file in
> drivers/mtd/nand/ folder. Since nobody answerd I tried to review the
> development of the latest patch "[PATCH
Hi everybody
and especially developers of i.MX31 NAND boot patches,
I wrote an e-mail yesterday asking about the need of the mx31_nand.c file in
drivers/mtd/nand/ folder. Since nobody answerd I tried to review the
development of the latest patch "[PATCH v4 0/6] MX31: NAND boot for PDK
boards."
> -Original Message-
> From: sadanand.tavad...@wipro.com
> [mailto:sadanand.tavad...@wipro.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 19, 2009 2:02 PM
> To: Prafulla Wadaskar
> Subject: RE: How to port uboot Marvell PXA320 Zylonite board
>
> Hi Prafulla
>
> We did "make zylonite_config" and generated
Hi,
I have a ARM board STR710FZ2T6, and I want to build u-boot for it, so I
downloaded the latest u-boot source,but it has not included STR710FZ2T6.So
can anyone tell me how to modify u-boot for STR710FZ2T6.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/how-to-build-a-U-Boot-forU-boo
Hi again,
> Hi Prafulla,
>
> > It's my pleasure to reply you :-)
> > Basic Kirkwood Soc Support patches are available on the
> > u-boot-arm.git/next (will be mainlined soon) Sheevaplug board support
> > patches are also submitted those are under review, you can find them
> > here...
> > http://li
Hi Prafulla,
>
> It's my pleasure to reply you :-)
> Basic Kirkwood Soc Support patches are available on the u-boot-arm.git/next
> (will be mainlined soon) Sheevaplug board support patches are also
> submitted those are under review, you can find them here...
> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot
Hi Wolfgang,
> I was asked about relicensing U-Boot as GPLv3:
>
> From:Richard Stallman
> Subject: U-book and GPLv3?
> To: Wolfgang Denk
> Date:Thu, 18 Jun 2009 09:17:28 -0400
>
>
> I really enjoy the name U-boot.
> What are the advantages of U-boot over PMON?
>
> Have you considere
Hi Jon,
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Jean-Christophe
> PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
>> On 16:51 Thu 18 Jun , Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I was asked about relicensing U-Boot as GPLv3:
>> I'm not for the GPLv3 I've the same opinion as Linus Torvald
>>
>> And as we share a lot'
Hi Giulio,
> Detlev Zundel wrote:
>
>> Hi Giulio,
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: giulio.bene...@micronovasrl.com
>>
>> Can you please provide a somewhat more descriptive description? It may
>> be obvious for you what this does (or what new features can now be
>> used), but it isn't for me.
[...]
> You
> -Original Message-
> From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de
> [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Dieter Kiermaier
> Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 1:35 PM
> To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Subject: [U-Boot] Marvell Kirkwood newbie question GPIO functions
>
> Hello everybody out
> -Original Message-
> From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de
> [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of
> sadanand.tavad...@wipro.com
> Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 1:42 PM
> To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Subject: [U-Boot] How to port uboot Marvell PXA320 Zylonite board
>
> Hi
>
On 00:01 Fri 19 Jun , Ben Warren wrote:
> David Brownell wrote:
> > On Wednesday 17 June 2009, Ben Warren wrote:
> >
> >> Applied to net repo.
> >>
> >
> > Thanks. Random question: is that driver going to move
> > into drivers/net or will it stay in cpu/arm920t? I thought
> > I saw y
Looks like when I was encoding the sector sizes, I forgot to divide by 8
(due to the stupid marketing driven process that declares all sizes in
useless megabits and not megabytes).
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger
---
drivers/mtd/spi/sst.c |8
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deleti
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger
---
drivers/mtd/spi/sst.c | 16
1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi/sst.c b/drivers/mtd/spi/sst.c
index cf7bce8..50e9299 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/spi/sst.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/spi/sst.c
@@ -55,6 +55,22 @@ s
Scott Wood wrote:
> Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>> Dear Scott,
>>
>> In message <4a39685f.6030...@freescale.com> you wrote:
>>> Hmm... perhaps check the alignment? If "end" is supposed to be the
>>> last to-be-erased byte, not the first not-to-be-erased byte, then if
>>> the low bits are 0 it's a size
David Brownell wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 June 2009, Ben Warren wrote:
>
>> Applied to net repo.
>>
>
> Thanks. Random question: is that driver going to move
> into drivers/net or will it stay in cpu/arm920t? I thought
> I saw you moving things out of cpu/* a while back.
>
> - Dave
>
>
51 matches
Mail list logo
