Re: [U-Boot] Watchdog timer and booting in Linux kernel

Hi, We able to integrate u-boot with Linux along with Watchdog enabled for PPC440gx processor. Here I am giving the modification we did to make it work. The intention to write this mail is to provide a reference code for the people who wants to use Watchdog feature with PPC440gx. We have used u-

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] Changes for single binary image for u-boot for NAND/OneNAND flash.

Pillai, Manikandan said the following on 03/04/2009 08:35 AM: >>> #if defined(CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_NAND) /* Environment is in Nand >>> >> Flash */ \ >> >>> - || defined(CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_SPI_FLASH) >>> + || defined(CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_SPI_FLASH) \ >>> + || (defined(CONFIG_CMD_NAN

Re: [U-Boot] FW: U-Boot hangs after loading device tree

> -Original Message- > From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de > [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Afzal Nadirshah > Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 12:42 PM > To: Pieter; u-boot@lists.denx.de > Subject: [U-Boot] FW: U-Boot hangs after loading device tree > > > > Hi Piete

[U-Boot] FW: U-Boot hangs after loading device tree

Hi Pieter, Thanks for your suggestion. I guess its halting at the point where u-boot is handing over to the Linux kernel image. For doing the post mortem analysis, I am not able to obtain the virtual address of the log_buf. grep log_buf System.map or grep __log_buf System.map doesn't give nay o

Re: [U-Boot] U-Boot hangs after loading device tree

Hi Pieter, Thanks for your suggestion. I guess its halting at the point where u-boot is handing over to the Linux kernel image. For doing the post mortem analysis, I am not able to obtain the address of the virtual Regards, Afzal Nadirshah -Original Message- From: Pieter [mailto:phenn..

Re: [U-Boot] AT91SAM926x Nor Boot

Thanks at all, J. Scharsig ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] Changes for single binary image for u-boot for NAND/OneNAND flash.

Hi, Pls find my comments below > -Original Message- > From: Nishanth Menon [mailto:menon.nisha...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 2:03 PM > To: Pillai, Manikandan > Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; dirk.be...@googlemail.com > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] Changes for single binar

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] Fix for running examples on OMAP3 EVM board

Pillai, Manikandan said the following on 03/04/2009 06:57 AM: > Hi all, > please dont top post. > For the EVM board, > > $BOARD = evm $CPU = arm_cortexa8 and $ARCH = arm. > $VENDOR = omap3 and $SOC = omap3 > > I can change the check to check BOARD so that it is applicable only > To OMAP3 EVMs. >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] Fix for running examples on OMAP3 EVM board

Hi, Fine with me. I can change the CPU-omap3 to SOC-omap3. > -Original Message- > From: Nishanth Menon [mailto:menon.nisha...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 11:49 AM > To: Pillai, Manikandan > Cc: Dirk Behme; u-boot@lists.denx.de > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] Fix fo

Re: [U-Boot] Uboot NAND sub system and it's commands

Thanks Scott for input Best regards -swapnali - Original Message - From: "Scott Wood" To: "Swapnali C. Patil" Cc: Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 4:18 AM Subject: Re: [U-Boot] Uboot NAND sub system and it's commands > On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 08:36:03PM +0530, Swapnali C. Patil wrote:

[U-Boot] How to Remove the padding bits from u-boot.bin

Hi All, I am using MIP405T board and trying to reduce the size of u-boot.bin by disabling the drivers that i didn't need. But the image size is not changing because it is padding all 1's at the end of the image. Can anyone tell me how to remove these padding bits. Image size is 512 K Actua

Re: [U-Boot] Bad CPU identification on MPC8544DS

jeff angielski wrote: > Despite the SVR being the same (0x803c0011), the latest u-boot is > misidentifying the CPU when compared against the original 1.3.0 u-boot. > The CPU is a 8544E but u-boot is reporting 8533E. > > The wierd part of this is that according to the Chip Errata for the > MPC8544

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] Fix for running examples on OMAP3 EVM board

Hi all, For the EVM board, $BOARD = evm $CPU = arm_cortexa8 and $ARCH = arm. $VENDOR = omap3 and $SOC = omap3 I can change the check to check BOARD so that it is applicable only To OMAP3 EVMs. ifeq ($(BOARD),evm) LOAD_ADDR = 0x8030 else Regards Mani > -Original Message- > From:

Re: [U-Boot] U-boot with SMSC LAN8700

On Tue, 3 Mar 2009 14:20:58 +0200 Louis Ruch wrote: > From what we can tell it should not be a problem and all we need to do is > enable RMII support for the uboot and it should detect the chip. Is this > correct? If it is how do we go about enabling RMII support for the device, > and is there

Re: [U-Boot] U-Boot 1.1.6 and Marvell 88E1116 RGMII operations

On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 17:45:08 -0800 Ray Fogg wrote: > cable, leading us to the suspicion that the MAC is not properly set up in > RGMII mode. > > We note that the newest release of U-Boot supports the Marvell 88E1118 PHY, > which uses the same die as the 88E1116. > > Our question is: has anyone

Re: [U-Boot] Alignment bug in itest on ARM & doesn't work on big-endian either?

Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > On 17:40 Tue 03 Mar , Tom Evans wrote: >> BUG IN ITEST >> >> itest crashes ARM chips. I can "iread.b *8200 == 0", >> but "iread.b *8201 == 0" throws an alignment >> exception that kills the box. The code in itest.c is: >> >> stat

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] Fix for running examples on OMAP3 EVM board

Nishanth Menon wrote: > Manikandan Pillai said the following on 03/03/2009 05:40 AM: >> Example binaries to be downloaded to 0x8030 for OMAP3 EVMs. >> >> Signed-off-by: Manikandan Pillai >> --- >> examples/Makefile |4 >> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> >> diff --

Re: [U-Boot] Coldfire: MCF5271: Periodic HW watchdog petting and sleep function does not work.

Richard, Can you be more specific on how the MAX6369 WDO and WDI connects to MCF5271's signal? Is it GPIO? ResetIn? Others? Regards, TsiChung On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Richard Retanubun < richardretanu...@ruggedcom.com> wrote: > Hi Guys, > > I am using u-boot 2009.03-rc1 and a board based

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Reduce OneNAND IPL common code (v3)

On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 09:05:53AM +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote: > OneNAND IPL has common codes for RAM init, load data, and jump to 2nd > bootloader, but it's common code used about 300~400 bytes. So board > specific codes, such as lowlevel_init, can't has enough code. It make > a difficult to imple

Re: [U-Boot] Status open patches: ColdFire

Wolfgang, We will include in the coming RC release. Thanks! Regards, TsiChung On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear John & Tsi Chung, > > I have the following patches still marked as open in my list. Could > you please have a look... > > ColdFire: > 12/04 "arun c"

Re: [U-Boot] U-Boot Scripting suggestions to decrement, counter in EEPROM.

Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > On 17:40 Tue 03 Mar , Tom Evans wrote: >> I'm implementing a rather complex boot that involves flags >> and counters in EEPROM. > > in which case do you need this? > > update? Yes, it is when updating the Linux Kernel and Sysroot images. These are

Re: [U-Boot] Uboot NAND sub system and it's commands

On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 08:36:03PM +0530, Swapnali C. Patil wrote: > Hello All, > I am using DM6446 (TI DaVinci) customized board. > 1. I am not able to understand meaning of NAND Sub system U boot commands, > e.g. nand write, nand read, nand erase etc. "write", "read", and "erase" are fairly s

[U-Boot] Bad CPU identification on MPC8544DS

Despite the SVR being the same (0x803c0011), the latest u-boot is misidentifying the CPU when compared against the original 1.3.0 u-boot. The CPU is a 8544E but u-boot is reporting 8533E. The wierd part of this is that according to the Chip Errata for the MPC8544E, the SVR *should* be 0x803c01xx

Re: [U-Boot] AT91SAM926x Nor Boot

Jens Scharsig wrote: > I'm start with a port for a new customer board with NOR-flash only. > Our customer don't like use AT91Bootstrap. > > I look at the source, but don't found any initialization code for > AT91SAM926x. > > My question: > > Are there any plans or patches which support to use

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Add the "mfill" and "mcheck" memory commands.

The mfill command writes the value of a counter to a memory area. The mcheck command verifies the memory area against the counter value. Those commands are useful for debugging memory/framebuffer controller. The configuration option is CONFIG_MFILL and this only takes effect if the memory commands

[U-Boot] AT91 Pull Request

Hi Wolfgang, Please pull The following changes since commit 32688e572ff96715b41420e9a7f280db6c399b65: Wolfgang Denk (1): Update CHANGELOG; Prepare 2009.03-rc1 are available in the git repository at: git://git.denx.de/u-boot-at91.git master Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD (11):

[U-Boot] [PATCH 8/9] at91sam9263ek add dcc support with at91sam9263ek_dcc_config

Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD --- Makefile| 11 +++ include/configs/at91sam9263ek.h |2 ++ 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile index 784af52..50ce78e 100644 --- a/Makefile +++ b/Makefile @@ -26

[U-Boot] [PATCH 9/9] at91rm9200ek: add dcc support with at91rm9200ek_dcc_config

Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD --- Makefile | 14 +- include/configs/at91rm9200ek.h |4 +++- 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile index 50ce78e..c24115d 100644 --- a/Makefile +++ b/Makefile @@

[U-Boot] [PATCH 7/9] at91rm9200: fix DCC support

Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD --- cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/interrupts.c |2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/interrupts.c b/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/interrupts.c index 5f0703c..3e35f68 100644 --- a/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/i

[U-Boot] [PATCH 6/9] at91rm9200: move serial driver to drivers/serial

add CONFIG_AT91RM9200_USART to activate the driver Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD --- cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/Makefile|2 +- drivers/serial/Makefile|1 + .../serial.c => drivers/serial/at91rm9200_usart.c |0 include/co

[U-Boot] [PATCH 5/9] Add support for the AT91RM9200EK Board.

From: Ulf Samuelsson with - NOR (cfi driver) - DataFlash - USB OHCI - Net Signed-off-by: Ulf Samuelsson Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD --- MAKEALL |1 + Makefile|3 + board

[U-Boot] [PATCH 4/9] at91rm9200dk: Move conditional compilation to Makefile

Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD --- board/atmel/at91rm9200dk/Makefile | 14 ++ board/atmel/at91rm9200dk/mux.c| 16 ++-- 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/board/atmel/at91rm9200dk/Makefile b/board/atmel/at91rm9200dk/Ma

[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/9] at91: rename DATAFLASH_MMC_SELECT to CONFIG_SYS_DATAFLASH_MMC_PIO

and add CONFIG_DATAFLASH_MMC_SELECT to activate it Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD --- board/atmel/at91rm9200dk/mux.c | 74 include/at45.h |2 +- 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-) rewrite board/atmel

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/9] AT91RM9200EK: fix broken boot from NOR flash

Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD --- cpu/arm920t/start.S |4 +--- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/cpu/arm920t/start.S b/cpu/arm920t/start.S index fbcfe6d..f610e9f 100644 --- a/cpu/arm920t/start.S +++ b/cpu/arm920t/start.S @@ -258,11 +258,9 @@ cpu_

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/9] at91sam9/cap9: use define instead hardcoded value for the USB_OHCI_REGS_BASE

Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD --- include/configs/afeb9260.h |3 ++- include/configs/at91cap9adk.h |3 ++- include/configs/at91sam9260ek.h |3 ++- include/configs/at91sam9261ek.h |3 ++- include/configs/at91sam9263ek.h |3 ++- 5 files changed, 10 inser

Re: [U-Boot] AT91SAM926x Nor Boot

On 10:35 Tue 03 Mar , Jens Scharsig wrote: > Hello, > > I'm start with a port for a new customer board with NOR-flash only. > Our customer don't like use AT91Bootstrap. > > I look at the source, but don't found any initialization code for AT91SAM926x. > > My question: > > Are there any plan

Re: [U-Boot] AT91SAM926x Nor Boot

On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 10:35:08AM +0100, Jens Scharsig wrote: > I'm start with a port for a new customer board with NOR-flash only. > Our customer don't like use AT91Bootstrap. > > I look at the source, but don't found any initialization code for > AT91SAM926x. > > My question: > > Are there an

Re: [U-Boot] Uboot and DMA

Hi Nikhil, praveen G wrote: > Hi, > Any updates?? > > Nikhil > On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 11:25 AM, praveen G wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Please let me know if Uboot uses DMA for any of its operations during board >> bootup. U-Boot supports quite a

[U-Boot] U-boot with SMSC LAN8700

Hello all, We have developed a board based on the Freescale MPC8315E-RDB. We have made some changes to the board in order to cut costs, and one of the changes made was to replace the standard Ethernet chip with the SMSC LAN8700 chip. We are able to start up the board and get it to launch u-boot:

Re: [U-Boot] Uboot and DMA

Hi, Any updates?? Nikhil On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 11:25 AM, praveen G wrote: > Hi, > > Please let me know if Uboot uses DMA for any of its operations during board > bootup. > Please let me know if Uboot has DMA support and if yes how?? > > Thanks in advance. > > Best Regards, > Nikhil > _

Re: [U-Boot] Uboot and DMA

Hi, Any info?? Best Regards, Praveen On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 11:25 AM, praveen G wrote: > Hi, > > Please let me know if Uboot uses DMA for any of its operations during board > bootup. > Please let me know if Uboot has DMA support and if yes how?? > > Thanks in advance. > > Best Regards, > Nikhi

Re: [U-Boot] AT91RM9200 U-Boot can not load initrd from flash

> To be more precise: Patches to the Linux kernel have been submitted... > I've searched archive using gmane but found only links to cvs whis is no longer used. This question seems to be asked frequently, so why don't you add it to FAQ along with link to patches to prevent further questions?

Re: [U-Boot] AT91RM9200 U-Boot can not load initrd from flash

> To be more precise: Patches to the Linux kernel have been submitted... > I've searched archive using gmane but found only links to cvs whis is no longer used. This question seems to be asked frequently, so why don't you add it to FAQ along with link to patches to prevent further questions?

[U-Boot] Is it possible to support interrupts in ARM without MMU in u-boot

Hi, I wanted to know whether it is possible to support arm interrupts in u-boot without MMU on. Since ARM expects the normal interrupt vectors to be either 0x or 0x0. If possible can be tell me what needs to be done?   Warm Regards, Akshay Bring your gang together

Re: [U-Boot] FSL DDR @ 83xx

Jerry Van Baren wrote: > Andre Schwarz wrote: >> Kumar Gala schrieb: >>> On Dec 9, 2008, at 12:01 PM, Andre Schwarz wrote: >>> Jon Loeliger schrieb: > On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 18:02 +0100, Andre Schwarz wrote: > >> Kim, >> >> I'd like to change my DDR setup code since it looks

[U-Boot] AT91SAM926x Nor Boot

Hello, I'm start with a port for a new customer board with NOR-flash only. Our customer don't like use AT91Bootstrap. I look at the source, but don't found any initialization code for AT91SAM926x. My question: Are there any plans or patches which support to use u-boot without AT91Bootstrap? or

Re: [U-Boot] U-Boot Scripting suggestions to decrement counter in EEPROM. Alignment bug in itest on ARM.

On 17:40 Tue 03 Mar , Tom Evans wrote: > I'm implementing a rather complex boot that involves flags and counters > in EEPROM. in which case do you need this? update? in u-boot you have better system that involve watchdog and bootcount I do not known which cpu or soc you use but you can imp

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] Fix for running examples on OMAP3 EVM board

Manikandan Pillai said the following on 03/03/2009 05:40 AM: > Example binaries to be downloaded to 0x8030 for OMAP3 EVMs. > > Signed-off-by: Manikandan Pillai > --- > examples/Makefile |4 > 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/examples/Makefile b/exampl

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Seperate mtdpart command from jffs2

On Tuesday 03 March 2009, Kyungmin Park wrote: > Some program such as UBI only used the mtdpart only. > however current jffs2 cmdline has dependent with jffs2 cmd > This patch make a build only jffs2 cmdline without jffs2 cmd dependency. Thanks. I'll review it in a few days. Best regards, Stefan

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] Changes for single binary image for u-boot for NAND/OneNAND flash.

Manikandan Pillai said the following on 03/03/2009 05:41 AM: > Support for single binary image for NAND/OneNAND based OMAP3 EVM > boards. The software has to set the flag CONFIG_ENV_IS_RUNTIME_SEL > in include/configs/omap3_evm.h. The software is able to detect > whether it is NAND or OneNAND flash