OK, that sorts out that problem, but thanks anyway for your response!
>>Dorothea
___
Tiscali Broadband from 14.99 with free setup!
http://www.tiscali.co.uk/products/broadband/
Christmas gift ideas and festive features - visit the Tiscali
give or take a few over ethernet
>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>On Behalf Of Kei
>Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2005 3:26 PM
>To: ICS support mailing
>Subject: Re: [twsocket] OK to Receiving >2GB ?
>
>Hi!
>
>I th
Hello David,
> I don't allocate the memory up to the size of the "Designated size" but
> keep realloc-ing until "remaining-byte" counter reaches zero..
I'm not sure I understeand exacly what you mean. But if you are
reallocating memory whole the time, you end up with a non efficient
program, if n
Kei wrote:
> I don't allocate the memory up to the size of the "Designated size" but
> keep realloc-ing until "remaining-byte" counter reaches zero..
> Do you think I should use TStream (Stream.readbuffer, readbuffer, ...)
> or just a pointer of buffer (malloc, realloc, and basic pointer
> operati
I don't allocate the memory up to the size of the "Designated size" but
keep realloc-ing until "remaining-byte" counter reaches zero..
Do you think I should use TStream (Stream.readbuffer, readbuffer, ...)
or just a pointer of buffer (malloc, realloc, and basic pointer
operations) ? Which one i
Kei wrote:
> Hi Everyone
>
> I've solved this problem.. what I do is make a count of "How many bytes
> remaining". Everytime the value returned by Receive() will be subtracted
> from the "BytesRemaining". When OnDataAvailable is repeatedly called, a
> buffer is kept being ReAlloc()'ed . When "Byte
Hello David,
Thanks for feedback. That is indeed the right way to do it. Remember
that Receive() may return -1, and in that case you dont want to
substrackt it from BytesRemaining, so something like this:
Count := TWSocket(Sender).Receive(Buf, Min(BufSize, BytesRemaining));
if Count <= 0 then
Hi Everyone
I've solved this problem.. what I do is make a count of "How many bytes
remaining". Everytime the value returned by Receive() will be subtracted
from the "BytesRemaining". When OnDataAvailable is repeatedly called, a
buffer is kept being ReAlloc()'ed . When "ByteRemaining" reaches z
Hello David,
> How do I know the maximum size possible?
at receiving side, specially depending on the speed of your own program
you mostly never get above 8 kb. However I have seen receiving packets
10 time as high. But you dont have to care mutch, if you receive not
all, then OnDataAvailable is
About 1500 bytes give or take a few over ethernet
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Kei
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2005 3:26 PM
To: ICS support mailing
Subject: Re: [twsocket] OK to Receiving >2GB ?
Hi!
I think I'm going to ac
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc879.html
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Kei
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2005 2:26 PM
To: ICS support mailing
Subject: Re: [twsocket] OK to Receiving >2GB ?
Hi!
I think I'm going to accept the
Hi!
I think I'm going to accept the reality that... TCP packets are splitted
into arbitrary sizes.. but!!!
How do I know the maximum size possible? What is the maximum size that a
packet can be? I certainly don't want to malloc 100KB for a TCP packet...
Thanks!
David
Wilfried Mestdagh wrote:
Hello David,
> Hi! I'm new to ICS!
Welcome to the group :)
> A->>B: msg hello
> B->>A: msg yo! how's it going?
Yes that's the way to go. Design a user made proto for what you intend
to do.
> If A is larger than the default buffer size (256 chars) then the A
> (sender) will warn B in advance
Y
Hi! I'm new to ICS!
I am designing a simple protocol that will be mainly used locally (as a
database server backend)..so I'm guessing I could send up to 2GB of
stuff without hassle (BLOBs, for example). Right now I'm just
experimenting with the facility for two parties to effectively "talk" to
eac
14 matches
Mail list logo
