For a server yes, but it's not "trouble" if you know the ports it's
configured to use, and make appropriate holes in the Server's firewall.
The client end, even for secure FTP still does not need any
firewall/router meddlings when "Passive" mode is used, as again it only
makes outgoing connections
Passive mode *Should not* need any firewall hole poking, at the Client
end.
That's the beauty of Passive mode! The client only ever makes outgoing
connections, it never has to receive an incoming one. Any half decent
firewall or NAT router, will handle all that transparently. It's worth
checkin
That just shows active connections.
You need:-
netstat -an
That shows chapter and verse, tcp and udp ports, connected, listening,
waiting etc.
If you do:-
netstat -anb
...on XP or later, you also (eventualy, it can take a while) the
processes that are associated with the ports and connections
Surely, an attached debugger is going to use some CPU time, however
small even if nothing triggers it, therefore, the debugged program cycle
timing will change somehow, however small.
Plus, however the debugger works, it could be forcing some other process
(in the kernel) to do it's job more often
Translated...
They want the users to see all the add's and fluf, other third parties
pay them to present, that many dedicated client app's wont show
DaveB.
> -Original Message-
> From: Anton S. [mailto:an...@rambler.ru]
> Sent: 21 March 2011 08:49
> To: twsocket@elists.org
> Subje
Take care.
UPnP is dangerous. It's a very common way for a lot of Malware on one PC to
open holes in the border firewall/router for it's own (doubtfull) ends.
UPnP was a nice idea for consumer stuff, but it opens a whole tanker full of
worms if used, hence many (most now?) windows PC's have th
Hi...
Indeed
If you go to www.overbyte.be that in turn takes you to
http://www.overbyte.be/frame_index.html, the "Quicklink" top right, with
"Latest ICS Version" showing, presents one with an ICSV5.zip file when
you hit the '>' button to start the process...
http://wiki.overbyte.be/wiki/inde
?
Regards.
Dave Baxter.
dave at uk-ar dot co dot uk (demangle as usual)
> -Original Message-
> From: twsocket-boun...@elists.org
> [mailto:twsocket-boun...@elists.org] On Behalf Of
> twsocket-requ...@elists.org
> Sent: 29 September 2010 13:00
> To: twsocket@elists.or
> -Original Message-
> From: Angus Robertson - Magenta Systems Ltd
> [mailto:an...@magsys.co.uk]
> Sent: 07 September 2010 09:47
> To: twsocket@elists.org
> Subject: Re: [twsocket] PASV fallback to public IP
>
>
> > Some FTP servers return wrong IP for PASV command (private
> instea
Hi.
There is still lots of "in-house" and some vendor support and
development for 2k among the indipendants. As just swapping out the
embedded PC is nowhere near as easy as it would be in an office or home
environment. The lack of EISA slots and "Real" COM ports, for existing
mega expensive hard
I suspect that data comes from querying browser an or or MS update
users.
There is still a *Huge* W2k installed base in industry, all those
machines and systems with it embedded. Heck, there are still many
DOS+Win3x based systems still running things in places. I even know of
one Comodor PET sti
Hi...
Anyone got or know of a simple (like minimal bagage) XMLRPC client tool,
component or unit for Delphi 7 with ICS?
I would like to interact with this...
http://www.w1hkj.com/Fldigi.html
It's a HF Radio data modem application, that works very well as a stand
alone app, but can also be used a
Hi.
Your best bet, as your user wants to use a specific proxy, is to ask
them to provide you with an install of such a proxy (as a loan item,
that you will return to them when you're done developing and testing)
with the account setup instructions, so you can make your own test
system, allowing yo
I presume you're looking for this... ?
http://proxy.wow.ag/proxyOnlyAnonymous.php?offset=0
There is a list of Transparrent proxies, if you look down the left of
that page.
I think they are Web/HTTP related, also needing the client to use a
specific port to connect to the proxy with. I'm not su
Came through here OK, Asian symbols and all.
Running OE 2003 SP3, on XP Pro, SP3, via Exchange server (unknown version/patch
level)
> -Original Message-
> From: =?iso-2022-jp?Q?=1B$B2f$ [mailto:=?iso-2022-jp?Q?=1B$B2f$]
> Sent: 22 April 2010 17:30
> To: twsocket@elists.org
> Subject: [
I'd go so far and say it's "Very Good". Even to the point of
re-assembling files from monitored packet streams too.
Dave B.
> -Original Message-
> From: Francois PIETTE [mailto:francois.pie...@skynet.be]
> Sent: 07 February 2010 18:40
> To: ICS support mailing
> Subject: Re: [twsocket
> -Original Message-
> From: Angus Robertson - Magenta Systems Ltd
> [mailto:an...@magsys.co.uk]
> Sent: 02 February 2010 10:46
> To: twsocket@elists.org
> Subject: Re: [twsocket] Static ARP
>
> > Does ICS provide any means to set static ARP entries?
>
> No ICS does not have support
Seems good old SSL is after all susceptable to some sort of Man In The
Middle atack.
http://www.grc.com/securitynow.htm
Scroll down, to episode 223.
Comments?
Dave B.
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listin
Hi..
What operating system?
Have you given any local firewall/secruity system permission for the
ping test program to do what it needs?
That is, use the machines networking resources.
Cheers.
Dave B.
> -Original Message-
> From: Signed Source(r) Project [mailto:dan...@signedsource.c
The problems seems to be "edn.embarcadero.com" (12.233.153.18) is sick
or off the air at the moment.
The domain responds to a Ping (average 173ms!) but none of the 3
browsers and 2 ISP combinations I have avalable here will download
anything from that address. "Timout waiting for server", or "Co
Hi...
Put them in a unique folder/directory, available to all app's. An
"easy" (if dirty) way, is in the System32 folder under Windows (or
WinNT.) Make sure you have one set, AND ONLY ONE SET of them on your
system, and all apps etc will use them as needed, so they only see the
same version.
If you can't easily use network broadcasts, you could setup a local IRC
server, and have each app' connect to that as a client. Sort of your
own LAN botnet! On a LAN, UDP works nicely too, if the LAN is not too
busy.
Most local machine AV/Firewall systems will allow outgoing connections,
and t
Hi..
Anyone (preferably in the UK) got a Kylix 3 install CD and activation
licence/code, they would like to sell/pass on?
If so, please contact me off list with the details.
Ta.
Dave B.
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-
well..
Dave B.
> -Original Message-
> From: Arno Garrels [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 19 September 2008 09:52
> To: ICS support mailing
> Subject: Re: [twsocket] Single port FTP
>
> Dave Baxter wrote:
> > Mind you, how would you handle simultaneous connections
Cant honestly see what the problem was...
Passive FTP is a well established mode, and is router/firewall (at the
client) friendly as they only ever make outgoing connections.
The only advantage I can see with this, is that the server side
router/firewall only needs one port forwarded.
Disadvanta
You could put your own entries in the systems Hosts files. So that for
example "PC1" would resolve to 192.168.1.100. One "set" of entries
common to all machines should do the trick...
Find that file at...
C:\WINDOWS\system32\drivers\etc in XP.
Add entries such as.
192.168.1.100 PC1
192.168.1.10
As someone who has in the past...
Not a lot, except spam, spam and yet more spam. Just my experience with that
site (and others).
Cheers.
Dave B.
> -Original Message-
> From: Primož Gabrijelčič [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 07 July 2008 23:05
> To: 'ICS support mailing'
> Subje
Hi..
As a result of my searching for a Windows based command line (or
whatever) RARP client. I found...
"Netwox" and "Netwag" (Google is our friend, again)
Cross platform etc, Netwox is the toolsuite while Netwag is a GUI
"wrapper", that uses Active TCL scripting.
I have to say, this toolsui
Sadly, RarpD is a RARP server, that will respond to incoming RARP
requests.
Interestingly, you have to provide it with a table of MAC addresses, and
corresponding IP addresses.
What I'm looking for I think is a command line RARP client.
Thanks anyway Francois.
Dave B.
> -Original Message
Good point Angus, I'll also look there, the windows private stuff that
is.
Dave B.
> -Original Message-
> From: Angus Robertson - Magenta Systems Ltd
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2008 3:21 PM
> To: twsocket@elists.org
> Subject: Re: [twsocket] Reverse ARP?
>
O
Many thanks Francois. It's the closest yet I think. I'll have a play
and report back, for completeness..
Thanks again.
Dave B.
> -Original Message-
>
> No sure it is what you need, but I've found this:
> http://www.frameip.com/entete-rarp/rarpd.zip
>
> --
> [EMA
Thanks Angus...
I need to do this in a way so as to minimaly impact the network as a
whole, while "discovering" the gadgets IP address. The last time I
"Pinged" an entire (class C) subnet, I got a visit from IT!.. ;-) I
think they were more upset I knew as much as they did about such
things..
Hi..
Does anyone here know how to implement a "Reverse ARP" request?
I have a piece of hardware that has a network port for remote control
(RJ45, 10/100 UTP etc) but next to no physical user interface, but it
does support IP address assignment by DHCP.
The documentation says to do a "Ping cX
If you've not already done so (Assuming you're using XP)
Make an "Exception" in Windows Firewall settings, for your application
(exe file name) and the port number it listens on. Especialy if it
needs to accept incoming data from outside the physical (or virtual) PC.
*Usually* XP's "Windo
Hi Dod..
No problem, and yes I also get hit by things like this, not only in
software!...
Trouble is, the longer we keep fixing these sort of things, the more of
them we get to do!
Supose it keeps us out of trouble, or does it?..
Cheers.
Dave B.
> -Original Message-
> From: Dod [mai
Hi...
Unless you are using an existing known protocol, in which case you'd
idealy use one of the recognised existing port numbers Port 80,
8008, 8080 for an HTTP server for example.
Letting the system pick a random port to listen on as a server is a bit
unproductive, as how would you inform
I'll take a look.
Cheers.
Dave B.
> -Original Message-
> From: wayne forrest [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Dave, thank you for all the advice, I will look into all of
> it for sure,
>
> about the Telnet Application: I recall seeing one at sourceforge.net.
>
> Hope that helps.
This ma
think Hamatchi will work, or would it ?
>
> On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 4:10 PM, Dave Baxter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > "NAT Traversal" is well documented, but "less than easy" to
> make work
> > from scratch
> >
> > But why bother
"NAT Traversal" is well documented, but "less than easy" to make work
from scratch
But why bother rolling your own? Just download and use Hamachi.
(Google for it) Even the free one will start automaticaly when Winderz
boots, then you have a UDP based secure VPN between 2 (or more) sites.
Jus
I suspect that's half the point. Only like equipped users can
communicate. Guess there could be a use in the financial or military
markets, or other intentionaly "closed" environments... There again,
I'd also guess they have such systems implemented already?
Servers, nothing to stop you delive
D1 path.
>
> --
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> The author of the freeware multi-tier middleware MidWare The
> author of the freeware Internet Component Suite (ICS)
> http://www.overbyte.be
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Dave Baxter" <[EMAIL PROT
Hi All...
This in regards to ICS V5. I think...
I wish to do some legacy stuff, involving Delphi1 (!!)
I'd like to implement a simple UDP conversation, to link an old Win16
app, to a new Win32 only driver via the "LocalHost". (I sort of
understand this way of doing things, I most defiantely
Passive Mode is the way to go, but some clients will still "trip up" it
seems, notably IE in it'a various flavours.
Make sure you have enough data ports forwarded in the router/firewall to
the PC that your "Server application" is attached to. That should not
be a problme testing your server from
Be aware though, that only the initial connection authentication is
secured with TLS/SSL, the POP and SMTP transfers are I am told not
secured.
Even so, it's very useful to have a POP/SMTP service you can use
reliably from any PC, anywhere, with a simple client on a USB stick for
example.
Dave B.
>From the limited exposure I've had to Vista (Home Basic) "client use".
A "Clean" install on the same hardware (P4 2GHz, 512MB Ram, 80G drive,
nVidia graphics) it run's at about half the speed of XP(Home) in just
about all respects. Whatever tweaks you do to it.
Where'd the "Wow" go?
Less than i
MadExcept does similar things.
http://www.madshi.net/madExceptDescription.htm
Very useful, to users of Delphi 4-7 that is, not other versions, or C
etc.
Dave B.
This mail has been scanned by Palmer Cook Computer Services Limited.
www.palmercook.co.uk
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings
You could try going on to the main ni.com website, and looking for the
self help support forum. The last time I went in there, there are
hundreds of competent programmers, many using Delphi of one release or
another (even D1!) so someone should have seen that problem and know of
a work arround.
I
>From personal experience.
I'm a registered user of several Yahoo mailing list's, and it's a pain!
They regularly get hit with spam, and-or the address lists are hacked
and then used outside of Yahoo by www spammers. Not just my suspicions
either, myself and many others have experimented by setti
> -Original Message-
> From: Arno Garrels
> V6 is still in beta state, that's why I prefer the best
> solution regardless whether it breaks existing application
> code or not, as long as such 'breaking' changes are well documented.
>
> Just my two cents.
At least it'll be well documen
49 matches
Mail list logo
