Re: [trojita] Systray unread count pull request

2014-01-10 Thread Jan Kundrát
On Friday, 10 January 2014 09:14:18 CEST, Tomasz Kalkosiński wrote: Taskbar count is now implemented passive, so it doesn't trigger any checks, it just counts numbers that mailboxes already have. If you're speaking about the code in current master, this is actually not true, at least in the

Re: [trojita] Systray unread count pull request

2014-01-10 Thread Tomasz Kalkosiński
Hi, Thank you for all the answers. I was not aware of many of these internal IMAP details. Taskbar count is now implemented passive, so it doesn't trigger any checks, it just counts numbers that mailboxes already have. I'd stick with this solution, so recursive check is cheap. With this solution

Re: [trojita] Systray unread count pull request

2014-01-09 Thread Stephan Platz
Hi, On Wednesday, January 8, 2014 10:53:21 PM CET, Jan Kundrát wrote: On Wednesday, 8 January 2014 22:04:48 CEST, Thomas Lübking wrote: Subscribed seems to inflexible (categorizing mailboxes where you just move stuff by hand) I guess I can accept the patch goeing without "all subscribed" as

Re: [trojita] Systray unread count pull request

2014-01-08 Thread Jan Kundrát
On Wednesday, 8 January 2014 22:04:48 CEST, Thomas Lübking wrote: I'd vote for opt-in with INBOX preselection, because of ... Yes, I haven't realized that this is essentially just a matter of a sane default -> I'm OK with removing the option "just INBOX" from the list. Subscribed seems to in

Re: [trojita] Systray unread count pull request

2014-01-08 Thread Jan Kundrát
On Tuesday, 7 January 2014 13:48:05 CEST, Tomasz Kalkosiński wrote: 1. Include all folders recursively 2. But only subscribed folders 3. With an opt-out option possible on every folder I think that would cover all your cases. Especially the one, when you can still subscribe a folder without coun

Re: [trojita] Systray unread count pull request

2014-01-07 Thread Stephan Platz
Hi, On Tuesday, January 7, 2014 1:48:05 PM CET, Tomasz Kalkosiński wrote: 1. Include all folders recursively 2. But only subscribed folders 3. With an opt-out option possible on every folder I'd really like to see this feature. I also like your solution for the stated problems. I suggest addi

Re: [trojita] Systray unread count pull request

2014-01-07 Thread Tomasz Kalkosiński
Hi Thank you for all kind words on my work. I am Java programmer, but KDE enthusiast. I've recently dropped KMail for its bloated Akonadi eating way too much resources for my two IMAP accounts. So I've evaluated Trojita and I like it. It has a few glitches, but message counter was crucial for me.

Re: [trojita] Systray unread count pull request

2014-01-02 Thread Kevin Krammer
On Thursday, 2014-01-02, 19:48:31, Jan Kundrát wrote: > On Thursday, 2 January 2014 10:30:38 CEST, Tomasz Kalkosiński wrote: > > I've submitted a pull request on github to improve systray unread count > > here: https://github.com/jktjkt/trojita/pull/5 . Please review and give > > me > > > a feedb

Re: [trojita] Systray unread count pull request

2014-01-02 Thread Jan Kundrát
On Thursday, 2 January 2014 10:30:38 CEST, Tomasz Kalkosiński wrote: I've submitted a pull request on github to improve systray unread count here: https://github.com/jktjkt/trojita/pull/5 . Please review and give me a feedback if you'd like to receive more pull requests this way. Hi Tomasz,

[trojita] Systray unread count pull request

2014-01-02 Thread Tomasz Kalkosiński
Hello list This is my first post so I want to say hi and thank you all for Trojita! I've submitted a pull request on github to improve systray unread count here: https://github.com/jktjkt/trojita/pull/5 . Please review and give me a feedback if you'd like to receive more pull requests this way.