Hello,
On Mittwoch, 7. Januar 2015 18:48:12 CET, Jan Kundrát wrote:
Opinions?
I vote for combining the user groups to two groups, one with
CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug for developers and debugging and one
CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=RelWithDebInfo or Release.
I don't really care whether release build conta
On Wednesday, 7 January 2015 09:25:25 CEST, Pali Rohár wrote:
Problem is that -Wall (or -W) is not standard option. Other
systems (like Windows) are traditionally using slash instead dash
when parsing options. Could be there some problem?
In theory, yes. In practice, even MSVC apparently recog
On Tuesday, 6 January 2015 23:25:39 CEST, Thomas Lübking wrote:
Occasional -O0 builds on all compilers (to ensure buildability)
could maybe done by the CI?
What we have now are CI runs for each iteration of each patch. While I do
have quite a few CPUs for that, the number is not infinity and t
On Sunday, 4 January 2015 00:58:41 CEST, Thomas Lübking wrote:
You may add as many
template class Template;
as ever you like and wherever you want - clang won't compile,
while gcc is happy with the one implementation in class.cpp and
no explicit instatiation at all. (Notice that multiple ex
On Mittwoch, 7. Januar 2015 09:25:25 CEST, Pali Rohár wrote:
Re debug symbols
Should stay by default.
Another question is: What do you mean by "default" above?
When you "cmake .." w/o further adjustments, this should result in an O2
build.
Whether you'd like to support a build type type tha
On Tuesday 06 January 2015 23:25:39 Thomas Lübking wrote:
> On Dienstag, 6. Januar 2015 18:15:02 CEST, Jan Kundrát wrote:
> > - Report all reasonable warnings.
>
> +1 (for sure)
>
+1
> > Warnings are IMHO quite useful because they can hint about
> > possible problems in the code.
>
> If there'
