On Freitag, 1. August 2014 14:19:00 CEST, Karan Luthra wrote:
If we keep making a new format for Fwd prefix count out of the
scope of this patch, then which out of the two original
alternatives can we move forward with, atleast for now? 1. Just
append a "Fwd: " to the subject line when a forwa
On Thursday, 31 July 2014 22:19:55 CEST, Thomas Lübking wrote:
I'm not aware on any standard on this, eg. german outlook will
send you stuff like:
WG: AW: Foo bar
Yes. Let's leave Outlook out for a while -- they break so many conventions
and standards that make it not relevant here. Ther
On Friday, August 1, 2014 1:49:55 AM IST, Thomas Lübking wrote:
I'd hope that other MUAs would jump on "Fwd:" and in doubt
consider the trailing number first part of the message (ie. when
condensing "Fwd:" prefixes to one, leave the header intact)
Even if we manage to save the count (i.e. the
