On 07/01/2014 11:10 PM, williamwin...@openmailbox.org wrote:
>
> With all the talk about the N_S_A targeting traffic between exit nodes
> and destination websites, I am wondering how this may work for hidden
> services (.onion domains). There are no exit nodes as everything occurs
> within the hid
williamwin...@openmailbox.org writes:
> How would it be possible for an adversary to learn that Person X
> rented a Tor hidden server from a hosting company that provided
> .onion domains and hosting (assuming that Person X paid for his/her
> hosting with Bitcoins and did not do anything stupid to
I don't know IRSSI that much.
Port 6697 is the SSL port, are you sure you use IRSSI in SSL mode?
Maybe you've to add '-ssl' or something.
Look here: http://www.oftc.net/NickServ/CertFP/#irssi
On Wed, 02 Jul 2014 04:03:20 +
Matt Pagan wrote:
>
>BlueStar88:
>> 37lnq2veifl4kar7.onion:6697 is
On 7/2/14, grarpamp wrote:
> Do these exist anywhere?
> If dead, can a simple tarball be put up?
> http://archives.seul.org/freehaven/dev/
https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://archives.seul.org/freehaven/dev/
Enjoy :)
Zenaan
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscrib
BlueStar88:
> On Tue, 01 Jul 2014 11:55:40 +
> Patrick Schleizer wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> At times OFTC bans Tor users. [1] Such as for the last days.
>>
>> Should we at least have a temporary alternative place to meet up. Any
>> suggestions?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Patrick
>>
>> [1] http://www.oftc.ne
On 02 Jul (04:03:20), Matt Pagan wrote:
>
> BlueStar88:
> > 37lnq2veifl4kar7.onion:6697 is up and running fine.
> >
> >
>
> When connecting with `screen torsocks irssi -c 37lnq2veifl4kar7.onion -p
> 6697` I get the error message:
>
> [(status)] [Jul 01 22:33:27] WARNING torsocks[26459]: [connec
On Wed, 02 Jul 2014 09:15:47 +
Patrick Schleizer wrote:
>BlueStar88:
>>
>> 37lnq2veifl4kar7.onion:6697 is up and running fine.
>
>Who runs that server? Inoffical one?
>
>I was more looking for a scalable, robust solution rather than
>individual quick fix.
Hello Patrick,
I don't know, who r
On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 10:06:38PM +0100, Mark McCarron wrote:
> Paul,
>
> Paul,
>
> What you are seeking a full design for a distributed Web Hosting
> platform within Tor. Let's see...
Well even a sketch (which you begin to provide below) would be more
helpful to be able to comment on whether
On Tue, 01 Jul 2014 08:35:49 -0400
t...@t-3.net allegedly wrote:
> -
>
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
>
> About tor-talk
> English (USA)
>
> This mailing list is for all discussion about theory, design, and
> development of Onion Ro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
I think that privoxy blocks this.
http://www.privoxy.org/
susa_metz...@mail.md:
> Hello Torproject, could you publish the funcionality (or develop an
> add on for the funcionality) of giving back an empty string in case
> of canvas webgl fingerprin
FYI:
There will be a Tor-ops meeting on Thursday, 2014-07-03, 19:00 at the
Metalab[0] in Vienna/Austria.
The meeting was planned way before the recent rulings in Austria became known
but they will be discussed for certain.
The actual purpose of the meeting shall be to finally found a Torserver
Hey!
On 02 Jul 2014, at 03:49, C B wrote:
> in no way makes Montblac, Southworth, or Smith's Stationary the least bit
> responsible for the bank robbery. This ruling is a clear lack of
> understanding of how the Internet and Tor work.
I totally agree. It contradicts Austrian legislation of the
Huzzah! That was the problem (hadn't attached the root and intermediate
CA certs). Thanks for your help.
On 7/1/14, 9:16 PM, Roman Mamedov wrote:
> On Tue, 01 Jul 2014 11:49:03 -0700
> Garth Patil wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I'm using Tor Browser 3.6.2-MacOS. I have a site that uses a free class
>> 1 SSL
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 3:58 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On 7/2/14, grarpamp wrote:
>> Do these exist anywhere?
>> If dead, can a simple tarball be put up?
>> http://archives.seul.org/freehaven/dev/
>
> https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://archives.seul.org/freehaven/dev/
Archive.org's mirrors o
We'll see how that continues.
https://rdns.im/court-official-statement-part-1
Apparently the operator is in need of a substantial heads up and
financial boost.
From what has been reported the judgement seems to be based on a
misapplied article in order to justify a conviction.
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 7/2/2014 2:54 PM, MacLemon wrote:
> Hey!
>
> On 02 Jul 2014, at 03:49, C B wrote:
>> in no way makes Montblac, Southworth, or Smith's Stationary the
>> least bit responsible for the bank robbery. This ruling is a
>> clear lack of understanding of
>That is nonsense. Why not arrest the owners of a stainless steel blade
>factory, because some people stab other people with those blades.
Okay .. try giving knives away anonymously out of the back of your garage and
let us know how you make out.
tl;dr .. don't tell the world to use TOR for host
This is an early report of the arrest.
http://lowendtalk.com/discussion/6283/raided-for-running-a-tor-exit-accepting-donations-for-legal-expenses
--
Christopher Booth
From: Runa A. Sandvik
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 1, 2014 9:00 P
On 7/2/2014 11:10 AM, Michael O Holstein wrote:
That is nonsense. Why not arrest the owners of a stainless steel blade
factory, because some people stab other people with those blades.
Okay .. try giving knives away anonymously out of the back of your garage and
let us know how you make out.
Am 2014-07-02 17:56, schrieb s7r:
> On 7/2/2014 2:54 PM, MacLemon wrote:
>> Hey!
>
>> On 02 Jul 2014, at 03:49, C B wrote:
>>> in no way makes Montblac, Southworth, or Smith's Stationary the
>>> least bit responsible for the bank robbery. This ruling is a
>>> clear lack of understanding of how th
Apologies, not sure this has been posted already in the thread, I'm
backlogged.
https://rdns.im/court-official-statement-part-1
Court – Official statement part #1
Posted on July 2, 2014 by Will
As seen possibly here, or here i lost the Tor case and was sentenced to 3
years probation (instead
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 7/2/2014 7:10 PM, Michael O Holstein wrote:
>> That is nonsense. Why not arrest the owners of a stainless steel
>> blade factory, because some people stab other people with those
>> blades.
>
> Okay .. try giving knives away anonymously out of the
What are the benefits of running TBB in a VM?
AIUI, there are two advantages.
1. If malware infects the VM, then just the VM is compromised. If your
Windows/Mac/Linux system is infected, then your entire system is affected (yes,
I realise that it should be only the user account for Linux
Tor Weekly News July 2nd, 2014
Welcome to the twenty-sixth issue of Tor Weekly News in 2014, the weekly
newsle
On Wed, 2 Jul 2014 19:11:26 +0200, Lunar wrote:
> The very first issue [1] of Tor Weekly News [2] was released on July
> 3rd last year.
Happy Birthday \o/
A huge thanks to all the people who worked on TWN! <3
Cheers,
--
Vigdis
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
tor-talk mailing lis
Hey!
On 02 Jul 2014, at 17:56, s7r wrote:
> Signed PGP part
> On 7/2/2014 2:54 PM, MacLemon wrote:
> The subject of this attracted my attention. Are we talking here about
> a clear law, written black on white which states that it is illegal to
> run Tor relays (or any kind of telecommunications
On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 01:23:27PM +0900, saurav dahal wrote:
> In atlas.torproject.org, I saw Bandwidth rate, burst and observed. Can
> anybody please explain these terms with the following example:
>
> Nickname IPredator
> *Bandwidth values*
> Bandwidth rate: 1073.74 MB/S
> Bandwidth burst: 2
On 07/02/2014 12:42 AM, ba...@clovermail.net wrote:
> There are little details on this case:
> https://network23.org/blackoutaustria/2014/07/01/to-whom-it-may-concern-english-version/
>
>
> Does the Tor project has a defense support fund or a list of committed
> pro bono lawyers in different coun
On 7/2/2014 11:41 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
Apologies, not sure this has been posted already in the thread, I'm
backlogged.
https://rdns.im/court-official-statement-part-1
Court – Official statement part #1
Posted on July 2, 2014 by Will
As seen possibly here, or here i lost the Tor case and was
Unfortunately he doesn't seem to want to take this further, so the
ruling will stand. It's his choice, but it could be a very bad
deterrent to other potential exit node operators in Austria.
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 10:54 PM, Moritz Bartl wrote:
> On 07/02/2014 12:42 AM, ba...@clovermail.net wrote:
On 7/2/2014 1:02 PM, Bobby Brewster wrote:
> What are the benefits of running TBB in a VM?
>
> AIUI, there are two advantages.
>
> 1.If malware infects the VM, then just the VM is compromised. If your
> Windows/Mac/Linux system is infected, then your entire system is affected
> (yes, I rea
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 01:12:54AM -0400, grarpamp wrote:
> Do these exist anywhere?
> If dead, can a simple tarball be put up?
> http://archives.seul.org/freehaven/dev/
Whoops!
Fixed now.
The archives were there the whole time, but the index page lied to
you about which months actually existed.
William is not planning on appealing but I strongly recommend that someone step
in and take the case for him because of the bad precedent that it sets. Just
because something "could be" used in a crime is absolutely no reason to not do
something. Your action only must satisfy that a) it "could b
Statement part #1: https://rdns.im/court-official-statement-part-1Posted on
July 2, 2014 by Will
As seen possibly here, or here i lost the Tor case and was sentenced to 3 years
probation (instead of 3 months jail) and all fees (court and experts,
Assumption ~3EUR, not less than 20k for sure)
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 9:58 PM, Seth David Schoen wrote:
>
> Then a question is whether users would want to use a service that takes,
> say, several hours to act on or answer their queries (and whether the
> amount of padding data required to thwart end-to-end traffic analysis
> is acceptable).
Why is markmonitor.com and its derivates in my TBB? How can I do to delete
this ? Are they watching me?
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
On 7/2/2014 6:56 PM, ideas buenas wrote:
Why is markmonitor.com and its derivates in my TBB? How can I do to delete
this ? Are they watching me?
"In your computer" in what sense? How does it manifest itself? What are
its derivatives?
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To
On 7/2/2014 2:21 PM, MacLemon wrote:
Hey!
On 02 Jul 2014, at 17:56, s7r wrote:
Signed PGP part
On 7/2/2014 2:54 PM, MacLemon wrote:
The subject of this attracted my attention. Are we talking here about
a clear law, written black on white which states that it is illegal to
run Tor relays (or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 7/3/2014 3:03 AM, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
>
> On 7/2/2014 2:21 PM, MacLemon wrote:
>> Hey!
>>
>> On 02 Jul 2014, at 17:56, s7r wrote:
>>
>>> Signed PGP part On 7/2/2014 2:54 PM, MacLemon wrote: The
>>> subject of this attracted my attention. Are we t
ideas buenas writes:
> Why is markmonitor.com and its derivates in my TBB? How can I do to delete
> this ? Are they watching me?
Hi,
Are you talking about seeing a markmonitor.com rule in the HTTPS Everywhere
Enable/Disable Rules menu?
https://www.eff.org/https-everywhere/atlas/domains/markmoni
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 03 Jul 2014 03:54:32 +0300
s7r wrote:
> In the blockchain I saw a pretty good fed of BTC to his donation
> address - folks in the community didn't turn back on this. With that
> sum donated there he could arrange for a top lawyer, minimum. I
On 07/02/2014 11:00 PM, Anders Andersson wrote:
> Unfortunately he doesn't seem to want to take this further, so the
> ruling will stand. It's his choice, but it could be a very bad
> deterrent to other potential exit node operators in Austria.
We are in contact with William, and quite possibly th
It appears to me that visa.com is blocking access to its site by users
using TOR. I was unable to access the site using TOR, but when I went to
the site from a browser, Epiphany, outside of TOR, access was
instantaneous.
Paul
--
Paul A. Crable. Portland, Ore. U.S.A.
--
tor-talk mailing list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Michael Wolf:
> On 7/2/2014 1:02 PM, Bobby Brewster wrote:
>> What are the benefits of running TBB in a VM?
>>
>> AIUI, there are two advantages.
>>
>> 1. If malware infects the VM, then just the VM is compromised. If
>> your Windows/Mac/Linux sy
On Thu, 3 Jul 2014 04:15:37 -
"Paul A. Crable" wrote:
> It appears to me that visa.com is blocking access to its site by users
> using TOR.
Yes, and they even block IPs of non-exit relays.
But that's somewhat of an old story, in this case it is still Akamai who's to
blame, and this has been
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 7:18 PM, Helder Ribeiro wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 9:58 PM, Seth David Schoen wrote:
>> Then a question is whether users would want to use a service that takes,
>> say, several hours to act on or answer their queries (and whether the
>> amount of padding data required
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 12:52 AM, Roman wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Jul 2014 04:15:37 -
> "Paul" wrote:
>
>> It appears to me that xxx is blocking access to its site by users
>> using TOR.
>
> On an unrelated note, yesterday a user reported they can't access a blog on
> livejournal.com via Tor. Even not
Confirmed. One of many that provides the same error message:
Access Denied
You don't have permission to access "http://www.visa.com/"; on this server.
Reference #xxx (not shown)
Access Denied Access Denied
You don't have permission to access
"http://www.visa.com/"
48 matches
Mail list logo
