89CB795A94
>
> ---- Original Message
> Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Decline in relays
> Local Time: December 26, 2017 11:16 AM
> UTC Time: December 26, 2017 11:16 AM
> From: zwie...@quantentunnel.de
> To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED M
: [tor-relays] Decline in relays
> Local Time: December 26, 2017 11:16 AM
> UTC Time: December 26, 2017 11:16 AM
> From: zwie...@quantentunnel.de
> To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Am 23-Oct-17 um 15:32 schrieb D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Am 23-Oct-17 um 15:32 schrieb David Goulet:
> Since July 2017, there has been a steady decline in relays from ~7k
> to now ~6.5k. This is a bit unusual that is we don't see often such
> a steady behavior of relays going offline (at least that I can
On 2017-10-24 03:30, nusenu wrote:
It appears to have started earlier than July if you graph metrics' csv
file for better granularity. Maybe somewhere in mid May 2017 (maybe
when
tor 0.2.9.x -> 0.3.0 started to spread? -> correlate it with the relays
by version graph)
I had a dead relay afte
(don't take this information as granted this was a quick 'n dirty thing)
David Goulet:
> Since July 2017
It appears to have started earlier than July if you graph metrics' csv
file for better granularity. Maybe somewhere in mid May 2017 (maybe when
tor 0.2.9.x -> 0.3.0 started to spread? -> corre
On 23 Oct (22:49:55), rasptor 4273 wrote:
> My relay has gone off the consensus.
> Fingerprint: E7FFF8C3D5736AB87215C5DB05620103033E69C3
Interesting. And it is still running as of now without any problems? Can you
give me the IP/ORPORT tuple?
You think you can add this to your torrc and then HUP
My relay has gone off the consensus.
Fingerprint: E7FFF8C3D5736AB87215C5DB05620103033E69C3
Alias: rasptor4273
Am running Tor 0.2.5.14 on Debian, Raspberry Pi 2B. I upgraded to that
version on September 3rd.
I grepped through these:
https://collector.torproject.org/archive/relay-descriptors/consens
David Goulet:
> Hello everyone!
>
> Since July 2017, there has been a steady decline in relays from ~7k to now
> ~6.5k. This is a bit unusual that is we don't see often such a steady behavior
> of relays going offline (at least that I can remember...).
>
> It could certainly be something normal h
On 23 Oct (09:37:31), Eli wrote:
> I can state the reason I stopped hosting my exit relay was due to tor rpm
> package not being up to date for CentOS 7. The last available version was
> considered out of date and no longer supported. So instead of running a
> relay that was potentially detrimenta
I can state the reason I stopped hosting my exit relay was due to tor rpm
package not being up to date for CentOS 7. The last available version was
considered out of date and no longer supported. So instead of running a relay
that was potentially detrimental to the health of the tor network I sh
Hello everyone!
Since July 2017, there has been a steady decline in relays from ~7k to now
~6.5k. This is a bit unusual that is we don't see often such a steady behavior
of relays going offline (at least that I can remember...).
It could certainly be something normal here. However, we shouldn't r
11 matches
Mail list logo
