RE: Tomcat3.3

2000-11-18 Thread Paulo Gaspar
> -Original Message- > From: Hans Bergsten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2000 00:34 > > Regarding the proposed changes, I'm +0. I'd like to see 3.3 (or ideally it > should be called 3.2.x if you decide to start from scratch with the 3.2 > base) as the continuati

Re: Tomcat3.3

2000-11-18 Thread Costin Manolache
My intention was to make sure we all agree about what goes into 3.3, and we all agree that those changes are not just "feature-ism", but things that will give us a better tomcat. Please review the list of changes - I'm willing to undo any of them if you have good arguments or a better solution (

Re: Tomcat3.3

2000-11-18 Thread Glenn Nielsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Tomcat3.2 had a large number of bugfixes that were not incorporated > in 3.3, and 3.3 has a probably a (possibly large) number > of new bugs resulting from the big changes and refactoring. > > Now, that I have a bit more time ( I hope :-), I can start spending > more

RE: Tomcat3.3

2000-11-17 Thread Larry Isaacs
> 1. In the current "main branch", incorporate all the fixes from > tomcat3.2, > plus fixes for the new bugs. > > 2. Start with tomcat3.2, and re-do all the changes. Hi Costin, My preference is for 1. I think that the major changes that have been made in Tomcat 3.3 are needed, and I would pre

RE: Tomcat3.3

2000-11-17 Thread Nacho
Hola Costin: I suspect that if you want to do the 2) proposal, we will not get the full potential of the changes already done ( that works despite the fact that there are many bugs to clean ) in the main branch as people willl say that is better to have a stable/robust release instead of a stable

Re: Tomcat3.3

2000-11-17 Thread cmanolache
, it's normal evolution of tomcat3 - if you are only interested in 3.2 bug fixes that can be done in 3.2.1, etc - but I can't see why/how tomcat3.3 can't evolve in the same way as 3.1 did. > > - new utils > > If they are truly reusable (e.g. used in both Tomcat and Jasper), wouldn't > org.apache.util be a better package name? I would love to - but it's not that easy :-) Costin

Re: Tomcat3.3

2000-11-17 Thread Hans Bergsten
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > [...] > Now, that I have a bit more time ( I hope :-), I can start spending > more time working on tomcat. There are 2 possible ways to do that: > > 1. In the current "main branch", incorporate all the fixes from tomcat3.2, > plus fixes for the new bugs. > > 2. Start w

RE: Tomcat3.3

2000-11-17 Thread Nacho
Hola Costin: > 1. In the current "main branch", incorporate all the fixes > from tomcat3.2, > plus fixes for the new bugs. > +1 Saludos , Ignacio J. Ortega

Tomcat3.3

2000-11-17 Thread cmanolache
Hi, As you know, 1-2 months ago, when Tomcat3.2 was frozen, I started to work on all the long-delayed things that were too "dangerous" to implement in tomcat3.2 time frame ( the list is at the end ). Most of that has been implemented ( I sent quite a few mails in addition to the normal CVS commi