Re: mod_webapp for Apache 2?

Alan Kelly wrote: I'd appreciate any advice in locating a mod_webapp connector for Apache 2/Tomcat 4.1. This particular connector is essential to an installation of webMathematica . mod_webapp has been deprecated since Tomcat 4.1.23. Use mod_jk2 instead. I've searched Jakarta-Apache site but ob

Re: mod_webapp for Apache 2, Win32

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello, > > I'd like to setup Apache 2.0.42 + TomCat 4.1 with mod_webapp on Win NT. > I found mod_webapp binary for Apache 1.3. It works fine. > But Apache 2 requires another mod_webapp binary. I failed to find it on ASF > web sites. > > I found only sources. I've downl

[PATCH] Re: mod_webapp returns improper HTTP header (Apache 2 + Tomcat 4)

.== ..--==- Thu, 4 Jul 2002 14:18:07 -0500, ..--==- Ten-Hung Chu (TC) discussed: TC) I am using Apache 2.0.39 with Tomcat 4.0.4 through mod_webapp (1.2.0-dev). TC) The connection works fine except getting to the welcome-file on tomcat. I TC) ca

Re: mod_webapp build problem

"GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> I'm trying to build a rpm for mod_webapp against >>> apache 1.3.23-mod_ssl and apache 2.0.35 on a redhat 7.2 box >>> >>> apache-2.0 failed : >> >> Working on it Henri... I have a whole new kit that I'm going to commit >> pretty soon, once it's d

RE: mod_webapp build problem

>> >> I'm trying to build a rpm for mod_webapp against >> apache 1.3.23-mod_ssl and apache 2.0.35 on a redhat 7.2 box >> >> apache-2.0 failed : > >Working on it Henri... I have a whole new kit that I'm going to commit >pretty soon, once it's done... Here's a short-hand patch from >my machine, >

Re: mod_webapp build problem

"GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to build a rpm for mod_webapp against > apache 1.3.23-mod_ssl and apache 2.0.35 on a redhat 7.2 box > > apache-2.0 failed : Working on it Henri... I have a whole new kit that I'm going to commit pretty soon, once it's done... Here's

Re: mod_webapp file changes for socket pools

Hi, Attached should be the updated socket pool changes to mod_webapp. I think I've incorporated the recommended changes. If you have any further comments just let me know Simon mod_webapp_update.zip Description: Zip compressed data -- To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: mod_webapp file changes for socket pools

"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Pier wrote: >> The only thing I don't like (much) is the name of the prototype functions: >> - warp_socket_pool_create >> - warp_socket_pool_acquire_socket >> - warp_socket_pool_return_socket >> >> And a lack of warp_socket_pool_destroy... >> >>

Re: mod_webapp file changes for socket pools

Pier wrote: > The only thing I don't like (much) is the name of the prototype functions: > - warp_socket_pool_create > - warp_socket_pool_acquire_socket > - warp_socket_pool_return_socket > > And a lack of warp_socket_pool_destroy... > > I would have called them > > - warp_sockpool_create > - w

Re: mod_webapp file changes for socket pools

"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Attached should be the changes I made to implement socket pools within > mod_webapp. Looks _good_... > I've added a new file, pr_warp_socketpool.c, as suggested. Noticed :) > In the zip file are the complete, changed, versions of the f

Re: mod_webapp socket pool changes

"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I've made some more progress on the socket pool implementation in mod_webapp > to solve the concurrent request problem on NT boxes and it is pretty much > complete. > > At the moment I am using a hard-coded constant to set the max numb

Re: mod_webapp socket pool changes

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > > I've made some more progress on the socket pool implementation in mod_webapp to >solve the concurrent request problem on NT boxes and it is pretty much complete. > > At the moment I am using a hard-coded constant to set the max number of available >sockets th

Re: mod_webapp contexts and virtual hosts

Hi, Jarecsni János wrote: > | > |Since I need to have applications available in root, I was trying confs > |like (I also have to use apache...): > | > |WebAppDeploy app_1 conn /app_1 > | > |with some rewriting but then it seems to be some session/cookie issue :( > | > > I've successfull

RE: mod_webapp contexts and virtual hosts

Hey, I've run into something similar, with mod_jk. More below -- Jarecsni, János MORGAN HILL CONSULTING, Internet Applications Unit mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://morganhillconsulting.hu/ :: Phone+Fax: + 36 1 484 0392 |-Original Message- |From: Szymon Stasik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] |

Re: [mod_webapp] error in configure script

JF, It works! Thanks. And last time I said I will submit mod_webapp version patch for apache-1.3. It is now ready, together with the one for apache-2.0. Please review. Punky --- jean-frederic clere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Done, please test > > Cheers > > Jean-frederic >

Re: [mod_webapp] error in configure script

"Clere, Jean-Frederic" wrote: > > Punky Tse wrote: > > > > I get the lastest cvs snapshot and get the following error > > > > ---8<- > > Finishing up > > checking for APR compilation flags... ok > > checking for Makefile targets... lib apache-2.0 >

Re: [mod_webapp] error in configure script

Punky Tse wrote: > > I get the lastest cvs snapshot and get the following error > > ---8<- > Finishing up > checking for APR compilation flags... ok > checking for Makefile targets... lib apache-2.0 > creating ./config.status > creating ./Makefile

Re: mod_webapp and other connectors status...

"Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I believe that 4.1-dev is the tip of the HEAD, 4.0.2-dev is the tip of >> tomcat_40_branch. > > That's correct. > > Currently I'm only building nightly distributions from the HEAD branch, > but it would be fairly straightforward to do nightly b

Re: mod_webapp and other connectors status...

On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Daniel Rall wrote: > Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2002 15:23:54 -0800 > From: Daniel Rall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: mod_webapp and oth

Re: mod_webapp and other connectors status...

GOMEZ Henri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > BTW: How did we get TOMCAT 4.1 and 4.0.2 ? Which is the head ? I believe that 4.1-dev is the tip of the HEAD, 4.0.2-dev is the tip of tomcat_40_branch. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

RE: [PATCH] RE: mod_webapp and other connectors status...

:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of jean-frederic clere Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 11:25 To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: [PATCH] RE: mod_webapp and other connectors status... Martin van den Bemt wrote: > > I tried the latest mod_webapp (build from jakarta-tomcat-connectors

Re: [PATCH] RE: mod_webapp and other connectors status...

D]]On Behalf Of jean-frederic clere > Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 15:11 > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: Re: mod_webapp and other connectors status... > > Martin van den Bemt wrote: > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > I probably missed a couple of threads on

Re: [PATCH] RE: mod_webapp and other connectors status...

e- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of jean-frederic clere > Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 15:11 > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: Re: mod_webapp and other connectors status... > > Martin van den Bemt wrote: > > > > Hi everyo

Re: mod_webapp and other connectors status...

GOMEZ Henri wrote: >>I'm been using 1.2.0 on my systems for months. Seems OK. >> > > There was a bug in 1.2.0 (jtc) with post mode > (search for messages about pmsg), corrected by Kevin Seguin > > > > > You're right, the code is correct in tomcat 3.3 mod_jk > and conform with the latest

[PATCH] RE: mod_webapp and other connectors status...

Martin PS My first patch, and not even a java one ;) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of jean-frederic clere Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 15:11 To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: mod_webapp and other connectors status... Marti

RE: mod_webapp and other connectors status...

Hi to all and Happy new year. Slowly back to mail after hollidays ,( >> - the stable jk1.x. We want to release it and it needs >testing - the code >> is very close to what was released with 4.0.1 and 3.3, with >few additional >> bug fixes, with the auto-conf generator for 4.x ( the code is the

Re: mod_webapp and other connectors status...

Martin van den Bemt wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I probably missed a couple of threads on mod_webapp, so forgive me ;) > > In the release notes of v4.0.2-b1 it states : > > * If you restart Tomcat, you must also restart Apache to avoid receiving > "Error 400 - Bad Request" errors. This will

Re: mod_webapp and other connectors status...

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > - the stable jk1.x. We want to release it and it needs testing - the code > is very close to what was released with 4.0.1 and 3.3, with few additional > bug fixes, with the auto-conf generator for 4.x ( the code is there, > but hasn't been tested too much ). I'm been

Re: mod_webapp and other connectors status...

On Mon, 7 Jan 2002, Martin van den Bemt wrote: > * If you restart Tomcat, you must also restart Apache to avoid receiving > "Error 400 - Bad Request" errors. This will be handled transparently > in the final release. This should work fine with jk. We don't support yet 'gracefull' restart fo

RE: mod_webapp and apache 2.0

and you don't have to hardwire it into mod_webapp sources. hope that helps Julius > -Original Message- > From: Justin Erenkrantz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 12:39 AM > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: Re: mod_webapp and apach

Re: mod_webapp and apache 2.0

On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 07:29:58PM -0800, Charles Yates wrote: > >On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 09:34:55AM -0800, Charles Yates wrote: > >> After getting errors from "apachectl configtest" relating > >>to invalid port I added a Port directive to httpd.conf and got > >>an error that Port directive had

Re: mod_webapp and apache 2.0

>On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 09:34:55AM -0800, Charles Yates wrote: >>After getting errors from "apachectl configtest" relating >> to invalid port I added a Port directive to httpd.conf and got >> an error that Port directive had been replaced by Listen. I then >> removed my Port directive, hacke

Re: mod_webapp and apache 2.0

On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 09:34:55AM -0800, Charles Yates wrote: >After getting errors from "apachectl configtest" relating > to invalid port I added a Port directive to httpd.conf and got > an error that Port directive had been replaced by Listen. I then > removed my Port directive, hacked on

Re: mod_webapp fails to build

Andrew Savory wrote: > > jean-frederic clere wrote: > > > I am afraid that is my fault... > > Heh. No problem, I'd be happy to post suggestions for revising > readme.txt/install.txt once I'm up and running! > > > I think your apxs is broken, what does the following commands return? > > /usr/bi

Re: mod_webapp fails to build

jean-frederic clere wrote: > I am afraid that is my fault... Heh. No problem, I'd be happy to post suggestions for revising readme.txt/install.txt once I'm up and running! > I think your apxs is broken, what does the following commands return? > /usr/bin/apxs -q CFLAGS -DLINUX=2 -DEAPI -DTARG

Re: mod_webapp fails to build

Andrew Savory wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm not having much joy with building webapp-module-1.0.1-tc401 source on > Debian 2.2r4 i686. > > 1) The instructions for building it are incorrect, as they say if you > download a source distribution, all you have to do is: > > ./configure --with-apxs

Re: Mod_webapp & Solaris 8

Matt Goyer wrote: > > I've been struggling with this for a week or two now.. > > I'm able to compile mod_webapp on Solaris 8 with GCC 3.0.1 using the > snapshots of mod_webapp and apr from CVS. However I have to modify my > apxs since three values don't get properly set by the apache makefile. >

Re: Mod_webapp & Solaris 8

On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 03:30:38PM -0500, Matt Goyer wrote: > I've got both binutils and libtool installed. > > How do I get it to use the GNU linker instead? Though 'ld -v' tells me > ld -v 'GNU ld version 2.11.2 (with BFD 2.11.2)' That's a good question. I'm not seeing any relevant flags or pa

RE: Mod_webapp & Solaris 8

y, November 28, 2001 1:56 PM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: Mod_webapp & Solaris 8 On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 10:08:28AM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 12:31:13PM -0500, mgoyer wrote: > > Httpd was built with gcc-3.0.1 the same version that I'm usi

Re: Mod_webapp & Solaris 8

On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 10:08:28AM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 12:31:13PM -0500, mgoyer wrote: > > Httpd was built with gcc-3.0.1 the same version that I'm using for > > mod_webapp. > > Then, just add -R/path/to/gcc-3.0.1/lib to your LDFLAGS for > httpd. There's a t

Re: Mod_webapp & Solaris 8

On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 10:32:05AM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > You could try: > > LIBS="-Lgcc" \ > LDFLAGS=-R/usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/3.0.1 \ > ./configure --enable-module=rewrite --enable-shared=rewrite Ack, I meant -lgcc not -Lgcc. Freezing cold sticky fingers. -- ju

Re: Mod_webapp & Solaris 8

On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 01:26:41PM -0500, Matt Goyer wrote: > Tricky beast it is! > > I installed gcc 3.0.1 using the sunfreeware package and it looks like > it's sticking the lib files in > /usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/3.0.1 so: > > To configure Apache I'm doing: > > LDFLAGS=-R

RE: Mod_webapp & Solaris 8

thing? Thanks, Matt -Original Message- From: Justin Erenkrantz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 1:08 PM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: Mod_webapp & Solaris 8 On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 12:31:13PM -0500, mgoyer wrote: > Httpd was built with gcc-3.0.1 the same

Re: Mod_webapp & Solaris 8

On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 12:31:13PM -0500, mgoyer wrote: > Httpd was built with gcc-3.0.1 the same version that I'm using for > mod_webapp. Then, just add -R/path/to/gcc-3.0.1/lib to your LDFLAGS for httpd. (Using gcc-3.0.1 on Solaris is a really tricky beast because gcc doesn't add the -R flags

RE: Mod_webapp & Solaris 8

Httpd was built with gcc-3.0.1 the same version that I'm using for mod_webapp. -Original Message- From: Justin Erenkrantz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 11:34 AM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: Mod_webapp & Solaris 8 On Wed, Nov 28, 2001

Re: Mod_webapp & Solaris 8

On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 11:15:07AM -0500, Matt Goyer wrote: > Syntax error on line 206 of /usr/local/apache/conf/httpd.conf: > Cannot load /usr/local/apache/libexec/mod_webapp.so into server: > ld.so.1: /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd: fatal: relocation error: file > /usr/local/apache/libexec/mod_weba

Re: mod_webapp & apache2 problems:

Brian P Millett wrote: > > Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 09:22:02AM -0600, Brian P Millett wrote: > > > Quick Synopsis of error (apache 2.0): > > > Syntax error on line 2 of /opt/apache/conf/mod_webapp.conf: > > > Invalid port number (p<1) No "Port" statement found > > >

Re: mod_webapp & apache2 problems:

Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 09:22:02AM -0600, Brian P Millett wrote: > > Quick Synopsis of error (apache 2.0): > > Syntax error on line 2 of /opt/apache/conf/mod_webapp.conf: > > Invalid port number (p<1) No "Port" statement found > > Oooh, I bet it is related to the change

Re: mod_webapp & apache2 problems:

Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 09:22:02AM -0600, Brian P Millett wrote: > > Quick Synopsis of error (apache 2.0): > > Syntax error on line 2 of /opt/apache/conf/mod_webapp.conf: > > Invalid port number (p<1) No "Port" statement found > > Oooh, I bet it is related to the cha

Re: mod_webapp & apache2 problems:

On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 09:22:02AM -0600, Brian P Millett wrote: > Quick Synopsis of error (apache 2.0): > Syntax error on line 2 of /opt/apache/conf/mod_webapp.conf: > Invalid port number (p<1) No "Port" statement found Oooh, I bet it is related to the change that we committed to set port to 0 i

RE: mod_webapp prevents response.flushBuffer

>-Original Message- >From: Pier Fumagalli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 4:21 PM >To: Tomcat Developers List >Subject: Re: mod_webapp prevents response.flushBuffer > > >On 13/11/2001 02:36 pm, "GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: mod_webapp prevents response.flushBuffer

On 13/11/2001 02:36 pm, "GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What APR shoud I use ? > > I've got a snap of JTC (rigth now), but I need to > get the correct APR ? Use yesterday night's nightly snapshot . I tested it and it works... > PS: Good news with Apac

RE: mod_webapp prevents response.flushBuffer

ECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 >-Original Message- >From: Pier Fumagalli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 3:33 PM >To: Tomcat Developers List >Subject: Re:

Re: mod_webapp prevents response.flushBuffer

On 13/11/2001 10:10 am, "GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ASAP, I'll make a snapshot of jtc in my home dir and do the > RPM Thanks :) Once I finish my Job Hunt I'll also probably have some time to update and tag a release... :( :( :( Pier -- To unsubscribe, e-mail:

RE: mod_webapp prevents response.flushBuffer

>> hi! >> >> when using mod_webapp as connector to apache, >response.flushBuffer() doesn't >> work in current versions of tomcat. i think this is because >of the packet >> system of the warp connector. >> >> we work with a modified version of tomcat, which sovles this >problem by >> implement

Re: mod_webapp prevents response.flushBuffer

On 12/11/2001 10:28 am, "Markus Letschka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hi! > > when using mod_webapp as connector to apache, response.flushBuffer() doesn't > work in current versions of tomcat. i think this is because of the packet > system of the warp connector. > > we work with a modified ver

Re: mod_webapp - regex matching

Sorry all, The patch I sent you it utter garbage, please disregard. Regards, James Williamson - Original Message - From: James Williamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 9:02 AM Subject: mod_webapp - regex matching > Hi all, > > I'm not s

RE: mod_webapp/SSL and TC 4.0

>I'm tempted to say neither HTTPS_KEYSIZE nor >HTTPS_SECRETKEYSIZE are the >correct answer..:) I feel it's HTTPS_KEYSIZE since it's only 56bits. Serious SSL implemtation like mod_ssl support 128bits :)

RE: mod_webapp/SSL and TC 4.0

nviado el: lunes 17 de septiembre de 2001 18:40 > Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Asunto: Re: mod_webapp/SSL and TC 4.0 > > > "Ignacio J. Ortega" wrote: > > > > > SPEC 2.3 : SRV.4.7 SSL Attributes > > > > > > Nota: the key size and cipher

Re: mod_webapp/SSL and TC 4.0

"Ignacio J. Ortega" wrote: > > > SPEC 2.3 : SRV.4.7 SSL Attributes > > > > Nota: the key size and cipher suite used are not allways > > available in web-server (IIS for example) > > > > > > Regard keysize in IIS, Please check this page below and point me to what > is key_size for 2.3 spec?

Re: mod_webapp: statically linked Apache

"Bojan Smojver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks. I've just noticed your post at Bugzilla. Nice touch ;-) If I don't post it there, I'll forget about it in less than 5 minutes :) Now it's in my "reminded bugs" default query :) > No hurry at all (I'm not even using TC 4 yet, just keeping my o

Re: mod_webapp: statically linked Apache

Pier Fumagalli wrote: > > "Bojan Smojver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Pier Fumagalli wrote: > >> > >> "Bojan Smojver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>> Hi Pier, > >>> > >>> I can see by the number of recent commits that you are very busy with > >>> mod_webapp. Can you tell me if the new

Re: mod_webapp: statically linked Apache

"Bojan Smojver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Pier Fumagalli wrote: >> >> "Bojan Smojver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Pier, >>> >>> I can see by the number of recent commits that you are very busy with >>> mod_webapp. Can you tell me if the new stuff will include support for >>> mod_we

Re: mod_webapp: statically linked Apache

Pier Fumagalli wrote: > > "Bojan Smojver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi Pier, > > > > I can see by the number of recent commits that you are very busy with > > mod_webapp. Can you tell me if the new stuff will include support for > > mod_webapp with a statically linked Apache of is it stil

Re: mod_webapp: statically linked Apache

"Bojan Smojver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Pier, > > I can see by the number of recent commits that you are very busy with > mod_webapp. Can you tell me if the new stuff will include support for > mod_webapp with a statically linked Apache of is it still DSO only? It's still DSO-only... An

RE: mod_webapp/SSL and TC 4.0

> SPEC 2.3 : SRV.4.7 SSL Attributes > > Nota: the key size and cipher suite used are not allways > available in web-server (IIS for example) > > Regard keysize in IIS, Please check this page below and point me to what is key_size for 2.3 spec?, HTTPS_KEYSIZE or HTTPS_SECRETKEYSIZE ? neit

RE: mod_webapp/SSL and TC 4.0

On Fri, 14 Sep 2001, GOMEZ Henri wrote: > Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 10:37:47 +0200 > From: GOMEZ Henri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: mod_webapp/SSL and TC 4.0 > > >> It should works at least for Apache 1.

Re: mod_webapp/SSL and TC 4.0

GOMEZ Henri wrote: > > >> I think there a little more missing: > >> - SSL_CLIENT_CERT_CHAIN_n (n is a number). > > >> - The user certificate object stored by mod_jk is a String not a > >> X509Certificate > > >> - I have prepared a patch for it - > > > >Patch for WebApp or JK, BTW? I'm starting

RE: mod_webapp/SSL and TC 4.0

>> I think there a little more missing: >> - SSL_CLIENT_CERT_CHAIN_n (n is a number). >> - The user certificate object stored by mod_jk is a String not a >> X509Certificate >> - I have prepared a patch for it - > >Patch for WebApp or JK, BTW? I'm starting to get confused :) JF talk about mod_jk

Re: mod_webapp/SSL and TC 4.0

"jean-frederic clere" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Pier Fumagalli wrote: >> >> "GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Hi to all, >>> >>> I take a look at mod_webapp and warp java, >>> and didn't find reference to SSL informations >>> forwarded from WebServer. >>> >>> Should it be fix

Re: mod_webapp/SSL and TC 4.0

"jean-frederic clere" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > GOMEZ Henri wrote: >> It should works at least for Apache 1.3/2.0. To follow the Servlet 2.3, take a look at jk in J-T-C since it also handle the SSL_KEY_SIZE. >>> >>> Yes, will do... Check out # 3510... >> >> You'll have also t

Re: mod_webapp/SSL and TC 4.0

"GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> It should works at least for Apache 1.3/2.0. >>> To follow the Servlet 2.3, take a look at >>> jk in J-T-C since it also handle the SSL_KEY_SIZE. >> >> Yes, will do... Check out # 3510... > > You'll have also to grab other information > like cipher s

RE: mod_webapp/SSL and TC 4.0

>> +ForwardSSLKeySize > >You mean adding a configuration parameter like >JkForwardSSLKeySize with default >value Off? Yes

Re: mod_webapp/SSL and TC 4.0

"jean-frederic clere" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Pier Fumagalli wrote: >> >> "GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Hi to all, >>> >>> I take a look at mod_webapp and warp java, >>> and didn't find reference to SSL informations >>> forwarded from WebServer. >>> >>> Should it be fix

Re: mod_webapp/SSL and TC 4.0

GOMEZ Henri wrote: > > >> Should we had this attribute to JT also to avoid broke > >> TC 3.2/3.3 when using mod_jk from JTC ? > > > >Would it be possible to ignore this attribute in TC 3.2/3.3? > > The problem is that the current ajp13 java implementation > TC 3.2/3.3 ignore this attribute and w

RE: mod_webapp/SSL and TC 4.0

>> Should we had this attribute to JT also to avoid broke >> TC 3.2/3.3 when using mod_jk from JTC ? > >Would it be possible to ignore this attribute in TC 3.2/3.3? The problem is that the current ajp13 java implementation TC 3.2/3.3 ignore this attribute and will fail to decode the stream and wi

Re: mod_webapp/SSL and TC 4.0

GOMEZ Henri wrote: > > >> About SSL_KEY_SIZE I have just noted I have committed a > >wrong code... I will > >> redo the things in some minutes ;-( > > > >I had to add SL_A_SSL_KEYSIZE from the apj14 protocol to apj13 > >otherwise we > >cannot fill "javax.servlet.request.key_size". > > Warning, o

RE: mod_webapp/SSL and TC 4.0

>> About SSL_KEY_SIZE I have just noted I have committed a >wrong code... I will >> redo the things in some minutes ;-( > >I had to add SL_A_SSL_KEYSIZE from the apj14 protocol to apj13 >otherwise we >cannot fill "javax.servlet.request.key_size". Warning, original ajp13 didn't support SSL_A_SSL

Re: mod_webapp/SSL and TC 4.0

"Clere, Jean-Frederic" wrote: > > GOMEZ Henri wrote: > > > > >> It should works at least for Apache 1.3/2.0. > > >> To follow the Servlet 2.3, take a look at > > >> jk in J-T-C since it also handle the SSL_KEY_SIZE. > > > > > >Yes, will do... Check out # 3510... > > > > You'll have also to grab o

Re: mod_webapp/SSL and TC 4.0

GOMEZ Henri wrote: > > >> It should works at least for Apache 1.3/2.0. > >> To follow the Servlet 2.3, take a look at > >> jk in J-T-C since it also handle the SSL_KEY_SIZE. > > > >Yes, will do... Check out # 3510... > > You'll have also to grab other information > like cipher suite used and bit

RE: mod_webapp/SSL and TC 4.0

>> It should works at least for Apache 1.3/2.0. >> To follow the Servlet 2.3, take a look at >> jk in J-T-C since it also handle the SSL_KEY_SIZE. > >Yes, will do... Check out # 3510... You'll have also to grab other information like cipher suite used and bit size of the algorithm SPEC 2.3 : SR

Re: mod_webapp/SSL and TC 4.0

Pier Fumagalli wrote: > > "GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi to all, > > > > I take a look at mod_webapp and warp java, > > and didn't find reference to SSL informations > > forwarded from WebServer. > > > > Should it be fixed before release since it > > may break the spec ? > > >

Re: mod_webapp/SSL and TC 4.0

"GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi to all, > > I take a look at mod_webapp and warp java, > and didn't find reference to SSL informations > forwarded from WebServer. > > Should it be fixed before release since it > may break the spec ? > > I could grab code from mod_jk to support >

RE: mod_webapp with Apache 2.0

;Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 09:17:25 -0700 >To: "Pier P. Fumagalli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Ian Kallen ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dirk-Willem van Gulik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subje

RE: mod_webapp vs. multi-thread component.

Hi Pier, >Whoha... Looking for troubles, huh? :) no - trouble usually comes looking for me :) >> B.T.W. My 'provider' is an interface between apache and an IIOP (CORBA) >> connector that allows apache to converse with tomcat (using an IIOP java >> connector). >One of these days you'll enlight

Re: mod_webapp vs. multi-thread component.

Thom Park at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Pier et. al. > > I hope that someone more enlightened can assist me with this one as I'm > totally flummoxed by this - this applies to Solaris threads being used within > mod_webapp (but not directly)... Whoha... Looking for troubles, huh? :) > I have

Re: mod_webapp functionality issues...

Silly me. I rebuilt the apache connector from cvs without also rebuilding the included java portion of the connector. Perhaps the file is called README.txt for a reason... On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 02:26:15PM -0500, Eric L. Anderson wrote: > On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 07:06:14PM +0100, Pier P. Fumagal

Re: mod_webapp functionality issues...

On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 07:06:14PM +0100, Pier P. Fumagalli wrote: > Eric L. Anderson at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > I finally have the apache connector compiled and talking to tomcat. > > Unfortunatley, whenever I try to make use of a "deployed" webapp, I get a > > "WebApp: Error 500" page. T

Re: mod_webapp functionality issues...

Eric L. Anderson at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I finally have the apache connector compiled and talking to tomcat. > Unfortunatley, whenever I try to make use of a "deployed" webapp, I get a > "WebApp: Error 500" page. The error in the apache error logs are as follows: > > [Fri Jul 27 09:50:15 2

Re: mod_webapp gives "Invalid virtual host name "

"Pier P. Fumagalli" wrote: > > Eryq at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > webapp-module-1.0-tc40b6 > > SunOS clin5 5.8 Generic_108528-07 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-60 > > Apache 1.3.20 > > gcc 2.95.2 > > tomcat 4b6 > > Ok > > > I built an Apache with dynamic loading, which is > > definitely worki

Re: mod_webapp gives "Invalid virtual host name "

Eryq at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > webapp-module-1.0-tc40b6 > SunOS clin5 5.8 Generic_108528-07 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-60 > Apache 1.3.20 > gcc 2.95.2 > tomcat 4b6 Ok > I built an Apache with dynamic loading, which is > definitely working. I build mod_webapp, and > try to start Apache.

Re: mod_webapp

Klaus Sonnenleiter at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Pier, > > I just ran into that problem myself: I think you can't get the older > version of APR anymore (or rather: I wasn't able to find it). I was able to > get everything to compile by just adding the parameter in the function > call. However

Re: mod_webapp

At 04:43 PM 7/18/01 +0100, you wrote: >jean-frederic clere at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > >> Nope... The official _stable_ WARP code is distributed with Tomcat > 4.0, and > >> resides in that CVS... The one you download from jakarta-tomcat-connectors > >> is the "working copy"... As soon as

Re: mod_webapp

Justin Erenkrantz at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 06:29:31PM +0200, jean-frederic clere wrote: >> I would advise to use a tagged version of APR in mod_webapp. Using the >> lastest >> one is/was not a good idea. >> >> I am using the APR tagged "APACHE_2_0_20" for testing mod

Re: mod_webapp

On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 06:29:31PM +0200, jean-frederic clere wrote: > I would advise to use a tagged version of APR in mod_webapp. Using the lastest > one is/was not a good idea. > > I am using the APR tagged "APACHE_2_0_20" for testing mod_webapp and it compiles > Ok at least on 2 of test plate

Re: mod_webapp

Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 05:28:25PM +0200, jean-frederic clere wrote: > > The CVS I have does not compile because apr_socket_create()... It misses the > > inherit parameter! > > APR has added it to the apr_socket_create(). Should I fix it or just tell we > > need a tag

Re: mod_webapp

> > Nope... The official _stable_ WARP code is distributed with Tomcat 4.0, and > > resides in that CVS... The one you download from jakarta-tomcat-connectors > > is the "working copy"... As soon as I tag a "stable" version, that gets > > copied over into the official repository... > > So we will

Re: mod_webapp

Justin Erenkrantz at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 04:43:57PM +0100, Pier P. Fumagalli wrote: >> I have an old pre-sms version of APR I'm using, and it seems it's working on >> most platforms "as-is"... I might ask the APR guys to tag it with >> "MOD_WEBAPP_1_0", or redistrib

Re: mod_webapp

On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 04:43:57PM +0100, Pier P. Fumagalli wrote: > I have an old pre-sms version of APR I'm using, and it seems it's working on > most platforms "as-is"... I might ask the APR guys to tag it with > "MOD_WEBAPP_1_0", or redistribute it in a nice tarball... Ha! -- justin

Re: mod_webapp

On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 05:28:25PM +0200, jean-frederic clere wrote: > The CVS I have does not compile because apr_socket_create()... It misses the > inherit parameter! > APR has added it to the apr_socket_create(). Should I fix it or just tell we > need a tagged APR (like APACHE_2_0_20). I think

  1   2   >