+1 to everything, esp "docs in same project"
- r
> -Original Message-
> From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, July 07, 2001 1:42 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Tomcat Documentation Project
>
>
>
>
>
On Tue, 3 Jul 2001, Alex Chaffee wrote:
> Leaving aside the issue of file format for just one second...
>
> Are we agreed on the following?
>
> 1. Tomcat documentation sucks :-)
>
> 2. There needs to be a new CVS project called jakarta-tomcat-doc.
>
> My reasoning is that we want to avoid t
>The main document still covers mod_jserv, the mod_jk document is a
>separate HOWTO, there's no mod_webapp coverage, the procedure for
>mod_jk.conf-auto has changed a few times, the instructions for NT and
>Unix are kind of jumbled...
We're working on JTC having an easy to build mod_jk, via au
>Are we agreed on the following?
>
>1. Tomcat documentation sucks :-)
documentation is impcomplete :)
>2. There needs to be a new CVS project called jakarta-tomcat-doc.
+1
>My reasoning is that we want to avoid the fragmentation of
>documentation
>into different trees for 3.2, 3.3, and 4.0.
>So my vote (if it counts), is one big (organized!) bucket of docs..
>Hope my input is any usefull.
+1
Each time they will be difference between TC version, a sub-chapter
should detail that difference (configuration, strategy...).
It will help people switch from one release to another.
Hi Pier,
> >
> > 1. Tomcat documentation sucks :-)
>
> +1
>
> > 2. There needs to be a new CVS project called jakarta-tomcat-doc.
>
> Strong -1. Tomcat 3.x and 4.x have just one thing in common right now. The
> friggin' servlet spec (and not even that since between the two
> versions they
> imple
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 09:34:39PM -0500, Glenn Nielsen wrote:
> > 1. Tomcat documentation sucks :-)
> >
>
> Thats a strong word, some parts are very good, some could use work.
Agreed; I was just using the term from a prior thread.
> > 2. There needs to be a new CVS project called jakarta-tomc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Leaving aside the issue of file format for just one second...
>
> Are we agreed on the following?
>
> 1. Tomcat documentation sucks :-)
>
Thats a strong word, some parts are very good, some could use work.
> 2. There needs to be a new CVS project called jakarta-t
> The main document still covers mod_jserv, the mod_jk document is a
> separate HOWTO, there's no mod_webapp coverage, the procedure for
> mod_jk.conf-auto has changed a few times, the instructions for NT and
> Unix are kind of jumbled...
All valid points, esp since m_web came out long after, and
>Rob S. wrote:
>
>Seeing as how I rewrote last summer it, I would be curious to know what's
>wrong w/the Apache config docs? =)
>
The main document still covers mod_jserv, the mod_jk document is a
separate HOWTO, there's no mod_webapp coverage, the procedure for
mod_jk.conf-auto has changed a fe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Leaving aside the issue of file format for just one second...
>
> Are we agreed on the following?
>
> 1. Tomcat documentation sucks :-)
+1
> 2. There needs to be a new CVS project called jakarta-tomcat-doc.
Strong -1. Tomcat 3.x and 4.x have ju
> Seeing as how I rewrote last summer it, I would be curious to
>
hahaha! notwithstanding my incredibly-timed typo of course =)
- r
> 3. There needs to be a better index/TOC for the documentation we do
> have, and a reorganization of the redundant / outdated / wrong parts of
> the existing docs (the Apache config stuff comes to mind).
Seeing as how I rewrote last summer it, I would be curious to know what's
wrong w/the Apache
+1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Leaving aside the issue of file format for just one second...
>
> Are we agreed on the following?
>
> 1. Tomcat documentation sucks :-)
>
> 2. There needs to be a new CVS project called jakarta-tomcat-doc.
>
> My reasoning is that we want to avoid the fragment
+1
Costin
On Tue, 3 Jul 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Leaving aside the issue of file format for just one second...
>
> Are we agreed on the following?
>
> 1. Tomcat documentation sucks :-)
>
> 2. There needs to be a new CVS project called jakarta-tomcat-doc.
>
> My reasoning is that we want
15 matches
Mail list logo
