>Are we agreed on the following?
>
>1. Tomcat documentation sucks :-)
documentation is impcomplete :)
>2. There needs to be a new CVS project called jakarta-tomcat-doc.
+1
>My reasoning is that we want to avoid the fragmentation of
>documentation
>into different trees for 3.2, 3.3, and 4.0. Why? Because a lot of
>documentation would apply equally to all versions.
+100000000000
>Looking at it in reverse, the fact that someone is using an
>old version
>of Tomcat shouldn't mean they're forced to use an old version of the
>documentation. Instead, a chapter on, say, web application deployment
>may need to have a sidebar describing changes between 3.x and 4.x, but
>assuming 4.x isn't *radically* different, they can both use the same
>core text. (In cases where 4.x *is* radically different, it would just
>have a separate document/chapter, with the 4.x specificity clearly
>labelled in the title.)
I totally agree with Alex....
