> 3. There needs to be a better index/TOC for the documentation we do
> have, and a reorganization of the redundant / outdated / wrong parts of
> the existing docs (the Apache config stuff comes to mind).
Seeing as how I rewrote last summer it, I would be curious to know what's
wrong w/the Apache config docs? =)
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the changes I made to the User's and Apache
guide like the biggest two (and only two major) changes in the docs since
Gal originally wrote them? Hell, that was last summer... just goes to show
how everyone likes to talk about docs, but no one actually DOES anything.
It's why I don't think creating a new project, <insert lots of good ideas
for doc mgmt. here> with someone to oversee it, etc. will work out in the
sense that any one or group of people will stick with it long enough to make
it worthwhile.
However, I would very much like to be proven wrong! ;)
- r
