Re: Tomcat 4.0

On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Thomas Colin de Verdière wrote: > Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 18:04:55 +0200 > From: Thomas Colin de Verdière <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject:

Re: Tomcat 4.0

On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Thomas Colin de Verdière wrote: > Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 15:52:57 +0200 > From: Thomas Colin de Verdière <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject

Re: Tomcat 4.0

There are not very involved since they should use another servlet container, even an application server. We have many of our customers using Tomcat 3.2.4 but some use Websphere, other WebLogic ... Our product work on tomcat we have our own Servlets and taglib delivered in WEB-INF/lib/ of our de

Re: Tomcat 4.0

Well in fact we would like to use Tomcat 4.0 but our customers may want to use Bea Weblogic, ATG dynamo .. We don't want to force them to use a specific server. My question should be : is there a way in Tomcat 4.0 to make it behave as a servlet 2.2, jsp 1.1 server. I looked at web.xml and there i

Re: Tomcat 4.0

Hi, The 2.3/1.2 spec requires implementations to be backward compatible. http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/ "As required by the specifications, Tomcat 4.0 also supports web applications built for the Servlet 2.2 and JSP 1.1 specifications with no changes." As far as the choice between 3.3.1 and

RE: tomcat 4.0 remote shutdown question ...

Wow! What a quick response. Thank you for your information. -Peter -Original Message- From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2002 3:41 PM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: tomcat 4.0 remote shutdown question ... On Sat, 27 Jul 2002

Re: tomcat 4.0 remote shutdown question ...

On Sat, 27 Jul 2002, HAVENS,PETER (HP-Cupertino,ex3) wrote: > Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2002 18:35:23 -0400 > From: "HAVENS,PETER (HP-Cupertino,ex3)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: tomcat 4.0 remote s

Re: tomcat 4.0 nightly builds broken since 5/30

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I've been testing all those versions... there seems to be a > couple issues I have seen with each... let me test 4.1.5 and > I'll let you know how it goes... 4.1.5 currently does not exist, but otherwise looks good. At the moment, there are some issues which still need

Re: Re: tomcat 4.0 nightly builds broken since 5/30

I've been testing all those versions... there seems to be a couple issues I have seen with each... let me test 4.1.5 and I'll let you know how it goes... t > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > The tomcat nightly builds are broken since 5/30. This is the > > last day before no good downloadable builds

Re: tomcat 4.0 nightly builds broken since 5/30

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The tomcat nightly builds are broken since 5/30. This is the > last day before no good downloadable builds will be available. > > http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/ The plan is to rely on Gump for the nightlies. There were some issues, which got fixe

Re: Tomcat 4.0 nightly build binary downloads broken?

On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Craig R. McClanahan wrote: > It wasn't Jasper2 that killed it ... it was the switch to Ant 1.5b2. I'll > try to get that working again on my box over the weekend, but it would be > better to migrate the standard nightly build process somewhere else. Well, jakarta-tomcat-util

Re: Tomcat 4.0 nightly build binary downloads broken?

On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote: > Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2002 10:24:00 -0700 > From: Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: Jonathan Eric Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > S

Re: Tomcat 4.0 nightly build binary downloads broken?

> I found that it looks like the nightly binary builds are broken. As you can > see, for some reason the many of the file sizes are only 45 bytes. Also, the > .zip file builds are missing. > > http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/nightly/ The switch to Jasper 2 probably killed it (

Re: Tomcat 4.0 with SSL

"Henry Lu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I followed the every steps in the doc for how-to do ssl. But I got > failure when I start the tomcat. > Since I couldn't see all error message, here is the on on the screen: > > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Native Method) > at > org.

Re: Tomcat 4.0 with SSL

I followed the every steps in the doc for how-to do ssl. But I got failure when I start the tomcat. Since I couldn't see all error message, here is the on on the screen: at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Native Method) at org.apache.catalina.startup.Bootstrap.main(Bootstrap.java:

Re: Tomcat 4.0 Beginner's Guide

Marty Hall you are a good guy. Thanks! At 03:00 PM 1/21/02 -0500, you wrote: >Hi- > Daniel Savarese suggested I contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with >this info. I've discovered that a surprising number of readers of my servlet >and JSP books (Core Servlets and JSP, More Servlets & JSP) need

Re: Tomcat 4.0 on IIS

On Fri, 16 Nov 2001, Rajan Gupta wrote: > Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 13:49:56 -0800 (PST) > From: Rajan Gupta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > EKR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Tomcat 4.0 on IIS > >

RE: Tomcat 4.0 license

dear list ... HOW THE HELL CAN I UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS LIST ??? Or at least to switch to digest mode ? -Original Message- From: HO,ELWIN (HP-Cupertino,ex1) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 3:30 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Tomcat 4.0 l

RE: Tomcat 4.0 cluster-mode

> -Original Message- > From: Bip Thelin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 7:36 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Tomcat 4.0 cluster-mode [stuff deleted] > I had some problems getting multicasting to work under Linux and > acco

RE: Tomcat 4.0 RPMs?

>> Jaxp and crimson are built from xml-commons and xml-crimson >( both are >> Apache packages ). We do check in binaries - which is consistent with >> apache licence, but anyone can built them from sources as well. In the RPM case, we use dependencies to have them included from allready installe

RE: Tomcat 4.0 RPMs?

>Hi Vic. We're currently trying to sort out the best way of >packaging a 4.0 RPM. >TC4 has quite a few external jar dependencies ... some optional, some >mandatory. We're kind of between a rock and a hard place with >both a few of the >RPM packaging policies as well as some jar redistributio

Re: Tomcat 4.0 RPMs?

Hi Vic. We're currently trying to sort out the best way of packaging a 4.0 RPM. TC4 has quite a few external jar dependencies ... some optional, some mandatory. We're kind of between a rock and a hard place with both a few of the RPM packaging policies as well as some jar redistribution issues.

Re: Tomcat 4.0-b7 doesnt compile jsp pages

> Dear Roland, > > Please write down the error, else no one can help > you. > > My servlet and Jsp files are runing fine in Tomcat > 4.0 beta7 ~ . > Ok, here again, I'm using Tomcat 4.0-b7 under Windows NT Server I unzip the Tomcat 4.0-b7 zip file to a directory. Start it, everything seems to

Re: Tomcat 4.0 (7/11) nightly build

> Prasad Subramanian [Contractor] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Hi , > > I was trying to get the latest nightly build for Tomcat 4.0 from the website > > and > > I found that there are two files a tar.Z and a tar.gz with a size of 1 k. I am > > unable to get the build from these. > > > > I wou

Re: Tomcat 4.0 (7/11) nightly build

On Wed, 11 Jul 2001, Prasad Subramanian [Contractor] wrote: > Hi , > I was trying to get the latest nightly build for Tomcat 4.0 from the website and > I found that there are two files a tar.Z and a tar.gz with a size of 1 k. I am > unable to get the build from these. > > I would appreciate

Re: Tomcat 4.0 (7/11) nightly build

Prasad Subramanian [Contractor] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi , > I was trying to get the latest nightly build for Tomcat 4.0 from the website > and > I found that there are two files a tar.Z and a tar.gz with a size of 1 k. I am > unable to get the build from these. > > I would appreciate a

Re: tomcat-4.0-doc/config/index.html in Netscape 6

kris at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > tomcat-4.0-doc/config/index.html does not view in Netscape 6 Forwarding to the Tomcat developers mailing list. Pire

Re: Tomcat 4.0/Solaris why doesn't tomcat follow soft links?

On Fri, 15 Jun 2001, Robert Evans wrote: > Craig, > > Thanks! I missed that in the docs when I first went through them. I found > the documentation on this feature, and now am wondering how much you know > about it. > > On the system I am forced to configure this on, the users accounts are

Re: Tomcat 4.0/Solaris server.xml file and public_html option

Craig, I figured I'd follow up on my last question with one more, since I noticed that the in the documentation there is a sample bit of code that says http://www.mycompany.com:8080/~craigmcc, which I am assuming is you...indicating you may indeed know quite a bit about this particular feature

Re: Tomcat 4.0/Solaris why doesn't tomcat follow soft links?

Craig, Thanks! I missed that in the docs when I first went through them. I found the documentation on this feature, and now am wondering how much you know about it. On the system I am forced to configure this on, the users accounts are mounted from a central nfs server. This means that the

Re: Tomcat 4.0/Solaris why doesn't tomcat follow soft links?

Under unix the Java SecurityManager doesn't like soft links. The reason is that the SecurityManager uses the real path when evaluating the codebase. Using Tomcat 4 you can configure the Context docBase to the realpath to the users public html directory. Regards, Glenn Robert Evans wrote: > >

RE: Tomcat 4.0/Solaris why doesn't tomcat follow soft links?

l Message- > From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 7:56 PM > To: Robert Evans > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Tomcat 4.0/Solaris why doesn't tomcat follow soft links? > > > > > On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Robert Evans

Re: Tomcat 4.0/Solaris why doesn't tomcat follow soft links?

On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Robert Evans wrote: > Greetings, > > I am in the process of configuring Tomcat to be used with several classes > at the Johns Hopkins University. I would like to have each student have > their own webapp in their public_html directory. > > I tried Tomcat 3.2.1, but cou

Re: tomcat-4.0 and JSP class reloading

On Thu, 31 May 2001 12:40:34 Remy Maucherat wrote: >Quoting "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> See below. >> >> On Thu, 31 May 2001, Remy Maucherat wrote: >> >> >> I'm not sure this proposed change would really make any difference. >> The >> "parent" classloader here is the web

Re: tomcat-4.0 and JSP class reloading

Quoting "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > See below. > > On Thu, 31 May 2001, Remy Maucherat wrote: > > > I'm not sure this proposed change would really make any difference. > The > "parent" classloader here is the web app classloader already, which is > the > same thing that the c

Re: tomcat-4.0 and JSP class reloading

See below. On Thu, 31 May 2001, Remy Maucherat wrote: > > i was litlle un detailed sorry but i try to explain. > > > > This can be test with Tomcat 4.0 b6-dev (last week CVS version at least i > haven't see this to be fixed) > > > > and turn reloading on to test/ context then create servlet that

Re: tomcat-4.0 and JSP class reloading

> i was litlle un detailed sorry but i try to explain. > > This can be test with Tomcat 4.0 b6-dev (last week CVS version at least i haven't see this to be fixed) > > and turn reloading on to test/ context then create servlet that uses this Class [test.TestIt] (i think you know how to do it) make

Re: tomcat-4.0 and JSP class reloading

i was litlle un detailed sorry but i try to explain. This can be test with Tomcat 4.0 b6-dev (last week CVS version at least i haven't see this to be fixed) make app dir like test/ then create index.jsp. make some class like test.testIt that context is like package test; public class TestIt

Re: tomcat-4.0 and JSP class reloading

On Wed, 30 May 2001, Tuukk4 |[:)<-<| p4s4n3n wrote: > hey, Is anyone fixing that point? Problem is that JSP doesn't reload > classes when servlet container in same context does? > Can you provide a small example that illustrates this? > Tuukka > Craig McClanahan

Re: Tomcat 4.0 Beta3 and Request Attributes Error - why me ?

Hello Ana, Wednesday, May 02, 2001, 8:23:09 PM, you wrote: A> Hi, Hello! A> We think we have discovered an error. That's nice! But why are you mailing me? I'm not a tomcat developer! :-) Best regards, Anthonymailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Tomcat 4.0 Beta3 and Request Attributes Error

On Wed, 2 May 2001, Remy Maucherat wrote: > > On Wed, 2 May 2001, Ana wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > We think we have discovered an error. We call the include method of the > > > RequestDispatcher from a servlet. Then, we call the setAttribute > method > > > of the request object of the included

Re: Tomcat 4.0 Beta3 and Request Attributes Error

> On Wed, 2 May 2001, Ana wrote: > > > Hi, > > We think we have discovered an error. We call the include method of the > > RequestDispatcher from a servlet. Then, we call the setAttribute method > > of the request object of the included JSP. If we call the getAttribute > > method of the request

Re: Tomcat 4.0 Beta3 and Request Attributes Error

> On Wed, 2 May 2001, Ana wrote: > > > Hi, > > We think we have discovered an error. We call the include method of the > > RequestDispatcher from a servlet. Then, we call the setAttribute method > > of the request object of the included JSP. If we call the getAttribute > > method of the request

RE: Tomcat 4.0 Beta3 and Request Attributes Error

On Wed, 2 May 2001, Charles Chen wrote: > RequestDispatcher.forward() returns immediately BUT the JSP page has not > been processed yet! That isn't actually true -- by the time that the forward() call returns, the forwarded-to servlet will indeed have been executed. Whether the output has bee

Re: Tomcat 4.0 Beta3 and Request Attributes Error

On Wed, 2 May 2001, Ana wrote: > Hi, > We think we have discovered an error. We call the include method of the > RequestDispatcher from a servlet. Then, we call the setAttribute method > of the request object of the included JSP. If we call the getAttribute > method of the request object

RE: Tomcat 4.0 Beta3 and Request Attributes Error

RequestDispatcher.forward() returns immediately BUT the JSP page has not been processed yet! The JSP page will only be processed after the servlet finishes the work, i.e., your doGet or doPost returns. Therefore, there is no way to access attributes in the JSP page inside the calling servlet. C

RE: Tomcat 4.0-beta-2 Security Vulnerability

>> I suggest that we create a revised version of beta >> 2, clearly labelled so >> that people will know whether they have the >> corrected version or not -- >> and we should do this immediately (like today) to >> minimize the number of >> people who end up downloading twice. >> >> I suggest we c

Re: Tomcat 4.0-beta-2 Security Vulnerability

e will download it accidentally. > Punky > Craig > > - Original Message - > From: "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 7:38 AM > Subject: Re: Tomcat 4.0-beta-2 Security Vulnerabi

Re: Tomcat 4.0-beta-2 Security Vulnerability

uesday, April 03, 2001 7:38 AM Subject: Re: Tomcat 4.0-beta-2 Security Vulnerability > > > On Mon, 2 Apr 2001, Mel Martinez wrote: > > > > > --- "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > I suggest that we create a

Re: Tomcat 4.0-beta-2 Security Vulnerability

On Mon, 2 Apr 2001, Mel Martinez wrote: > > --- "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I suggest that we create a revised version of beta > > 2, clearly labelled so > > that people will know whether they have the > > corrected version or not -- > > and we should do this imme

Re: Tomcat 4.0-beta-2 Security Vulnerability

--- "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I suggest that we create a revised version of beta > 2, clearly labelled so > that people will know whether they have the > corrected version or not -- > and we should do this immediately (like today) to > minimize the number of > people w

Re: Tomcat 4.0-beta-2 Security Vulnerability

- Original Message - From: "Glenn Nielsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 12:39 AM Subject: Re: Tomcat 4.0-beta-2 Security Vulnerability > Jon Stevens wrote: > > > > on 4/2/01 2:20 PM, "Crai

Re: Tomcat 4.0-beta-2 Security Vulnerability

Jon Stevens wrote: > > on 4/2/01 2:20 PM, "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I suggest that we create a revised version of beta 2, clearly labelled so > > that people will know whether they have the corrected version or not -- > > and we should do this immediately (like today

Re: Tomcat 4.0-beta-2 Security Vulnerability

on 4/2/01 2:20 PM, "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I suggest that we create a revised version of beta 2, clearly labelled so > that people will know whether they have the corrected version or not -- > and we should do this immediately (like today) to minimize the number of > pe

Re: Tomcat 4.0 Class Loader Reorganization

Hi, I build tomcat-4.0 from CVS this morning and tried it with the TDK and everything looks good! No "sealing violoation", and the XML-RPC service which requires xerces started up without a hitch. It was starting the XML-RPC service which made the "sealing violation" visible. I haven't tried Jet

Re: Tomcat 4.0 ServletOutputStream and Serialized object problem

Hi, I tested object serialization, and apparently it works fine for me (with JDK 1.3). What could happen is that older versions of the JDK may not support chunking correctly. In the future, that will be addressed by looking at the user-agent and falling back to HTTP/1.0 mode if a broken user age

Re: Tomcat 4.0 and JSP

> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< > > On 2/13/01, 10:19:16 PM, "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote regard= > ing=20 > Re: Tomcat 4.0 an

RE: Tomcat 4.0 and JSP

on like me, the Linux user, then I'll understand. ;) > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< > > On 2/13/01, 10:19:16 PM, "Remy Maucherat" &

Re: Tomcat 4.0 and JSP

Why would you complain about HTML mail, if you using M$ software (outlook)? If you were the person like me, the Linux user, then I'll understand. ;) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<&l

Re: Tomcat 4.0 and JSP

> How in apache do I get all my .jsp files to be executed by tomcat. > Even when I use the WebAppMount, the servlets work, but it won't execute >the jsp. Basically I don't car about servlets, I just want my server > to recognize any *.jsp and have tomcat 4.0 execute without having to > specify a

Re: [Tomcat 4.0] Proposed Change in Build Scripts

Craig R. McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > jakarta-tomcat-4.0 > build/<-- Build destination for Tomcat > dist/ <-- Dist destinatino for Tomcat > catalina/ > build/<-- Build destination for Catalina portion > >

RE: [Tomcat 4.0] Proposed Change in Build Scripts

As long as this works with sandboxing different versions of the system, it should be fine. That is, jakarta-tomcat-4.0 will use, by default, the ant in ../jakarta-ant/dist and the servlet api in ../jakarta-servletapi-4/dist, and so on. -Original Message- From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto

Re: [Tomcat 4.0] Proposed Change in Build Scripts

Craig R. McClanahan wrote: > > I propose to change all of the build scripts (and associated > README files) to reflect this new structure, in time for the > next beta release. +1. Please add appropriate .cvsignore files. - Sam Ruby -

Re: [Tomcat 4.0] Proposed Change in Build Scripts

"Craig R. McClanahan" wrote: > jakarta-tomcat-4.0 > build/<-- Build destination for Tomcat > dist/ <-- Dist destinatino for Tomcat > catalina/ > build/<-- Build destination for Catalina portion > > di

Re: [Tomcat 4.0] Proposed Change in Build Scripts

on 2/1/01 9:30 AM, "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There is movement in the various Jakarta subprojects towards modifying > build scripts so that "build" and "dist" targets are created *within* > the top-level source directory, rather than "up and over" the way they > are now.

RE: [Tomcat 4.0] Proposed Change in Build Scripts

+1 And +1 for TC 3.x branch. On ne peut résoudre les problèmes les plus graves avec le même esprit qui les a crées. -- Albert Einstein >-Original Message- >From: Sam Ruby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 7:45 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subje

Re: [Tomcat 4.0] Proposed Change in Build Scripts

GOMEZ Henri wrote: > And +1 for TC 3.x branch. Yes, please. =) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Tomcat 4.0] Proposed Change in Build Scripts

This makes a heck of a lot of sense to me... ( an unofficial +1 I guess :) David - Original Message - From: "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 09:30 Subject: [Tomcat 4.0] Proposed Change in Build Scripts > There is movem

Re: [Tomcat 4.0] Proposed Change in Build Scripts

This is a good idea. And as we already did with watchdog we should do the same here. +1 for the change. Thanks -Ramesh >Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm >list-help: >list-unsubscribe: >list-post:

Re: Tomcat 4.0

Kurt Schrader wrote: > I feel that the CVS situation is rather ambiguous on the Tomcat 4 front > right now. Is the 4.1 branch going to continue to exist in CVS? I > thought it was going away after recent discussion. > It is -- but we wanted to make sure we've back-ported all of the appropria

Re: Tomcat 4.0 merge done

Remy Maucherat wrote: > I've just completed the merge, which was way easier to do than what I > expected. > > Feel free to send bugs reports / comments ... > Remy, the new code causes three Watchdog-4.0 test fails: /jsp-tests/jsp/tagext/tld_resource_path/positive_JAR_URI.jsp /jsp-tests/jsp/tage

Re: Tomcat 4.0 w/Apache question

Matthew, > Couple of simple questions to help us get TC 4.0 going like we had for > Tomcat 3.1 > > 1. Which Apache connectors can we use to talk to TC 4.0? I know of > mod_jserv, mod_jk, and mod_webapp. Which of these work with TC4.0 and which > one is best given our requirements. Currently,

Re: [Tomcat 4.0] Updated Documentation

Craig R. McClanahan typed the following on 09:06 PM 1/13/2001 -0800 >The information that is presented in the Server Configuration section is all up >to date AFAIKT, but several sections are not yet written. With this, as with >the rest of the docs (and the code, of course :-), feel free to sugge

Re: [tomcat-4.0] Session Creation Slowness

I have confirmed that: The latest nightly build fixes this problem and Turbine/Catalina now starts up and initializes and returns a request in about 3-4 seconds on my machine...more than acceptable now. :-) thanks craig for tracking it down. this is going to save months of development time. :-)

Re: [tomcat-4.0] Session Creation Slowness

> > > > > Is there a particular page I should go to for triggering session creation? I want > to try this with 4.0-m5 and also with the updates I just checked in (which will > appear in tonight's nightly build). the above url is enough. i will try o

Re: [tomcat-4.0] Session Creation Slowness

Jon Stevens wrote: > > >> If you want to duplicate it, you can check Scarab out of CVS and do it > >> yourself. I have re-done the CVS tree and it is very easy to get things up > >> and running (even without a database installed...just ignore that part of > >> the README.txt file). > >> > >>

Re: [tomcat-4.0] Session Creation Slowness

on 12/21/2000 2:35 PM, "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yep, although that's probably something that could be changed. +1 >> more with this 4-5 seconds. If so, then I think that 4-5 seconds is to slow >> as well and we should find another RNG solution. > > Patches are welcome

Re: [tomcat-4.0] Session Creation Slowness

Jon Stevens wrote: > > I can deal with 4-5 seconds although that is a bit long as well. Is this > code re-executed when the classloader is dumped as well? Yep, although that's probably something that could be changed. > If not I can deal > more with this 4-5 seconds. If so, then I think that 4-

Re: [tomcat-4.0] Session Creation Slowness

on 12/21/2000 2:04 PM, "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jon Stevens wrote: > >> Ok, I put a whole bunch of logging into Turbine to see *exactly* what line >> of code is causing the slowness that I keep reporting here and I have now >> found it... >> >> Log.note ("RunDataFactor

RE: [tomcat-4.0] Session Creation Slowness

This is probably due to the new SecureRandom-based session IDs. There is an option to turn that off somewhere. -Original Message- From: Jon Stevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2000 1:47 PM To: tomcat-dev Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [tomcat-4.0] Session Creat

Re: [tomcat-4.0] Session Creation Slowness

Jon Stevens wrote: > Ok, I put a whole bunch of logging into Turbine to see *exactly* what line > of code is causing the slowness that I keep reporting here and I have now > found it... > > Log.note ("RunDataFactory: 11"); > // Get the HttpSession object. > data.setSession

Re: Tomcat 4.0 m4 filter impl.

> > > The choices seem to be: > > > > > > * Start skipping this filter when building the chains. > > > > > > * Block all requests that would normally invoke this filter. > > > > > > I'm inclined to be worried by the first alternative -- especially if we > > started > > > skipping an authentication

Re: Tomcat 4.0 m4 filter impl.

Geoff Soutter wrote: > > "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > (Thanks to Geoff for prodding me to respond to this :-) > > thanks to craig for responding :-) > > > > The areas I'm confused about follow: > > > > > > 1) Filters and UnavailableException > > > > > > Filters can th

Re: Tomcat 4.0 m4 filter impl.

"Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > (Thanks to Geoff for prodding me to respond to this :-) thanks to craig for responding :-) > > The areas I'm confused about follow: > > > > 1) Filters and UnavailableException > > > > Filters can throw UnavailableException, but the 2.3 PFD does

Re: Tomcat 4.0 m4 filter impl.

(Thanks to Geoff for prodding me to respond to this :-) Danny Coward (specification lead for Servlet 2.3) is going to comment separately on the spec related aspects of the questions below. I'll stick mostly with the Tomcat 4.0 implementation stuff, and express a few options -- but they aren't au

RE: [PROPOSAL] building is easy (was: Re: [tomcat-4.0] building i s hard)

: Re: [tomcat-4.0] building i s hard) I agree with Stuart! Let me also state that 99% of the OSS C projects built with "configure" out there build into their own directory by default. However, most have the option to build to another directory. That is something I'm willing to suppor

Re: [tomcat-4.0] running on MacOSX Beta 2

> Any ideas why a stock m5 won't run on MacOSX beta 2? > > java version "1.2.2" > Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (1.3.0, mixed mode, internal release build) Craig forgot to package jndi.jar with the M5 distribution, so if you're running JDK 1.2 it will complain :( Download JNDI 1.2 from Sun, and put

Re: [tomcat-4.0] setting the root context seems broken as well

Jon Stevens wrote: > on 12/17/2000 7:31 PM, "Jon Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > In tomcat-4.0/conf/server.xml, I have defined: > > > > > > > > I figured out this problem...it should be: > > > > > No "/" in there. > > That is a bug. > :-) > I'd say that is actually a feature :-)

Re: [tomcat-4.0] setting the root context seems broken as well

on 12/17/2000 7:31 PM, "Jon Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In tomcat-4.0/conf/server.xml, I have defined: > > > I figured out this problem...it should be: No "/" in there. That is a bug. :-) -jon -- Honk if you love peace and quiet.

RE: [tomcat 4.0] Turning off random number seeding

on Stevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2000 9:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [tomcat 4.0] Turning off random number seeding on 12/17/2000 7:17 PM, "Marc Saegesser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The SecureRandom used in Tomcat 3.2 (and I assume in To

Re: [tomcat 4.0] Turning off random number seeding

on 12/17/2000 7:17 PM, "Marc Saegesser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The SecureRandom used in Tomcat 3.2 (and I assume in Tomcat 4.0, as well) > takes 10-15 seconds to initialize on my PIII/600. I posted a patch a while > back to move the PRNG initialization into context initialization (again fo

RE: [tomcat 4.0] Turning off random number seeding

ubject: Re: [tomcat 4.0] Turning off random number seeding Jon, I thought the RNG only took around 5 seconds on that kind of machine. Are you sure it's not classloading taking the time? I found removing the manifest from my .jar files can make up to an order of magnitude difference on some

Re: [tomcat-4.0] bug in directory listing

on 12/17/2000 6:55 PM, "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Originally it was in DefaultServlet, but now it's in > resources.DirectoryBean. > I'll move the code back to the DefaultServlet, eventually (we plan to remove > the Resources stuff after 4.0). > > Remy Ok, this code is WAY to

Re: [tomcat 4.0] Turning off random number seeding

I think that my log file below shows that it clearly isn't classloading. Everything that would probably need to be loaded is loaded already. -jon on 12/17/2000 6:58 PM, "Geoff Soutter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jon, > > I thought the RNG only took around 5 seconds on that kind of machine.

Re: [tomcat 4.0] Turning off random number seeding

Jon, I thought the RNG only took around 5 seconds on that kind of machine. Are you sure it's not classloading taking the time? I found removing the manifest from my .jar files can make up to an order of magnitude difference on some servlet engines... Cheers Geoff - Original Message -

Re: [tomcat-4.0] bug in directory listing

> It doesn't include the port number in the links of the output and therefore, > the links are invalid. > > Also, what is responsible for generating the directory listings? I tried to > find the source code for it so that I could patch it myself, but I couldn't > find it! Originally it was in Def

Re: [tomcat-4.0] don't touch any of the build system in CVS fortomcat/servletapi

on 12/15/2000 5:05 PM, "Sam Ruby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We probably need a higher bandwidth communication at some point. You are welcome to come out and stay at my house in Berkeley. :-) I have an extra futon with a featherbed on it as well as plenty of hardware for us to develop on. :-)

Re: [tomcat-4.0] don't touch any of the build system in CVS for tomcat/servletapi

Jon Stevens wrote: > > no no no no no...keep reading... > > Essentially a basis buildmaker project for people to work from. > >That is what I thought that you just said you were creating. We probably need a higher bandwidth communication at some point. I'm building exactly what I described. It

Re: [PROPOSAL] building is easy (was: Re: [tomcat-4.0] building i s hard)

Craig, Thanks for this. If my analysis is correct I think our preferences are very similar, but we started with different viewpoints: 1. I saw Tomcat as a stand-alone project dependent on other stand-alone projects : you saw Tomcat as part of one interdependent Jakarta project. 2. I saw the

Re: [tomcat-4.0] don't touch any of the build system in CVS fortomcat/servletapi

on 12/15/2000 11:59 AM, "Sam Ruby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jon Stevens wrote: >> >> I didn't remember you posting about building such a system, >> but it is MOST appreciated and wanted. > > Posted innumerable times, but here it is once again: > > > http://oss.software.ibm.com/developerwo

  1   2   >