----- Original Message -----
From: "Glenn Nielsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 12:39 AM
Subject: Re: Tomcat 4.0-beta-2 Security Vulnerability
> Jon Stevens wrote:
> >
> > on 4/2/01 2:20 PM, "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I suggest that we create a revised version of beta 2, clearly labelled
so
> > > that people will know whether they have the corrected version or
not --
> > > and we should do this immediately (like today) to minimize the number
of
> > > people who end up downloading twice.
> > >
> > > I suggest we call the updated version "Tomcat 4.0-beta-2-update-1" or
> > > something like that.
> > >
> > > Comments? Votes?
> > >
> > > Craig
> >
> > -1 on an update. it just adds confusion imho and i don't see a reason to
> > resist having many beta releases.
> >
> > Just make a beta 3.
> >
> > -jon
>
> I agree, beta 3 avoids confusion.
>
> +1 for a beta 3 release.
>
> Glenn
+1 for beta 3 ;-) is too confusing to create update version
