On Mon, 2 Apr 2001, Mel Martinez wrote:
>
> --- "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I suggest that we create a revised version of beta
> > 2, clearly labelled so
> > that people will know whether they have the
> > corrected version or not --
> > and we should do this immediately (like today) to
> > minimize the number of
> > people who end up downloading twice.
> >
> > I suggest we call the updated version "Tomcat
> > 4.0-beta-2-update-1" or
> > something like that.
> >
> > Comments? Votes?
> >
>
> I vote you just call it "Tomcat-4.0-beta-3". I don't
> recall ever being told there were limits to the number
> of betas one can produce. :-) I believe that a new
> beta number is justified by any significant bug fix or
> fixes and a security hole is definitely significant,
> even if the code change may be tiny.
>
> By labeling it 'beta-3' it is CLEARLY the latest build
> and CLEARLY newer than beta-2.
>
Makes sense to me. "Beta 3" it is.
> fwiw,
>
> Dr. Mel Martinez
> G1440, Inc.
>
Craig
