jean-frederic clere wrote:
I am building a rpm of Tomcat for one of FSC product (OpenIS). It
installs Tomcat in /opt/SMAWoIS/jakarta-tomcat-${VERSION} and
/opt/SMAWoIS/jakarta-tomcat or /opt/SMAWoIS/jakarta-tomcat5. It uses
jsvc (for common-daemon) to start/stop the Tomcat.
I was planning to "b
Costin Manolache wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Costin Manolache wrote:
It seem we had one - but was removed 4 years ago, when Henri started
it's RPMs ( if I remember corectly ).
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/jakarta-tomcat/src/etc/Attic/tomcat.spec?rev=1.3&view=markup
If I update it for
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Costin Manolache wrote:
It seem we had one - but was removed 4 years ago, when Henri started
it's RPMs ( if I remember corectly ).
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/jakarta-tomcat/src/etc/Attic/tomcat.spec?rev=1.3&view=markup
If I update it for 4.x and 5.0 - and manag
Costin Manolache wrote:
It seem we had one - but was removed 4 years ago, when Henri started
it's RPMs ( if I remember corectly ).
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/jakarta-tomcat/src/etc/Attic/tomcat.spec?rev=1.3&view=markup
If I update it for 4.x and 5.0 - and manage to get it working on wind
Costin Manolache wrote:
It seem we had one - but was removed 4 years ago, when Henri started
it's RPMs ( if I remember corectly ).
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/jakarta-tomcat/src/etc/Attic/tomcat.spec?rev=1.3&view=markup
Wow, that's really old.
If I update it for 4.x and 5.0 - and manage to
It looks like FHS compliant. I like symlinks too.
+1 (although I always use the tarball :-)
Bojan
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
>
> Hi to all,
>
> I want to propose a new packaging policy for Tomcat,
> 3.2/3.3/4.0 RPMs.
>
> Up to now, the Tomcat RPM which are built from the source
> present in jakarta
>What is *noarch*, exactly.. I installed this one because at
>the time it was
>the only RPM I could find but am I missing out?
noarch indicate it's not native code (i386/sparc...)
It's java code ...
What is *noarch*, exactly.. I installed this one because at the time it was
the only RPM I could find but am I missing out?
-Original Message-
From: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 4:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: RPM of 3.3m3
>> Just a quick recall of build of rpms.
>>
>> There are built under Redhat 6.2 / Redhat 7.1 (validation)
>>
>> - using latest jikes 1.14
>> - using latest IBM SDK 1.3 (javadoc)
>> - with latest ant 1.3, xerces-j 1.4, xalan-j 2.1.0
>>
>> I encounter rare problems when building with jikes,
>> at
> Just a quick recall of build of rpms.
>
> There are built under Redhat 6.2 / Redhat 7.1 (validation)
>
> - using latest jikes 1.14
> - using latest IBM SDK 1.3 (javadoc)
> - with latest ant 1.3, xerces-j 1.4, xalan-j 2.1.0
>
> I encounter rare problems when building with jikes,
> at least o
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
>
> Just a quick recall of build of rpms.
>
> There are built under Redhat 6.2 / Redhat 7.1 (validation)
>
> - using latest jikes 1.14
> - using latest IBM SDK 1.3 (javadoc)
> - with latest ant 1.3, xerces-j 1.4, xalan-j 2.1.0
>
> I encounter rare problems when building with
01 4:24 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: RPM for tomcat 3.2.2-1 : any problems reported?
>
>
>I tested against the current rpm for 3.2.2-1, and all is fine.Never
>mind :)
>
>I guess I should have emphasized 'seems' in my first sentence below.
>
>geir
&g
I tested against the current rpm for 3.2.2-1, and all is fine.Never
mind :)
I guess I should have emphasized 'seems' in my first sentence below.
geir
"Geir Magnusson Jr." wrote:
>
> We just discovered a classloader-related problem with Velocity when used
> in Tomcat 3.2.2 that seems to hav
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Subject: Re: RPM of 3.3m3 - XERCES-J instead of JAXP - Agree ?
>>
>>
>>
>>What about using jaxp-1.1 ? You can now build the whole thing from
>>xml-commons, xml-crimson and xml-xalan.
>>
>>Jaxp1.0 is quite old, we sho
364F 80E6
>-Original Message-
>From: Swart, James (Jim) ** CTR ** [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 5:56 PM
>To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
>Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
>Subject: RE: RPM
>
>
>you can get tomcat 3.2.1 rpms fo
> >Where can I find java and tomcat *.rmp packages?
> >
> >regards,
> >Margus Hein
> >
http://rpmized.free.fr is a starting point of Henry Gomez's
rpm efforts. incze
Damnit! Can't remember. Ask Henri Gomez.
Adam.
At 14:08 14/06/2001 +0200, you wrote:
>
>Hello.
>
>Where can I find java and tomcat *.rmp packages?
>
>regards,
>Margus Hein
>
>
Adam Fowler
Second year Computer Science undergraduate
University of Wales, Aberystwyth
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w
.
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 8:41 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: RPM of 3.3m3 - XERCES-J instead of JAXP - Agree ?
>
>
>
>
___[_]
>> EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
>> PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
>> PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
>>
>>
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL
CEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
> PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
>
>
>
> >-Original Message-
> >From: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 12:58 PM
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: RE
xerces>
>I try to install on Mandrake 8.0, tomcat-3.3-m3.1.noarch.rpm
> and it has
>a dependencie on Xerces-j. I found it at xml.apache.org, but
>no rpm what DO
>you have a solution ?
>ps: I then check with tomcat-3.2.2-1.noarch.rpm and
>everything works
>perfectly.
Apache rpms are all
> I'd love to see up-to-date Debian packaging, but I think it would be a
> challenge to keep it quite as up-to-date as CVS. Perhaps a regular
> "stable" release for Debian unstable and a nightly build for those of
> us
> who like pain?
I didn't know much about debian packaging but there is a tool
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > Costin, could you please move your upload directory for these nightly builds to
> > someplace else? The problem is that you're confusing the people who wonder why
> > the nightly builds have nothing to do with the current (3.2) code release.
>
> I can move them t
> What about spliting the package - /opt/tomcat for the JARs,
> /var/log/tomcat for tomcat logs, /home/httpd/webapps for webapps ?
Up to redhat 6.2, /home/httpd was the serverroot. Config goes
to /etc/httpd/conf and misc logs in /var/log/httpd.
> It would be nice to have a standard - what are t
>
> Costin, could you please move your upload directory for these nightly builds to
> someplace else? The problem is that you're confusing the people who wonder why
> the nightly builds have nothing to do with the current (3.2) code release.
I can move them to tomcat-3.3 - I wanted to avoid con
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > I would be interested in hearing from folks here whether they percieve
> > > a need for Debian packaging, or whether they prefer to "roll their
> > > own"?
> >
> > I'd love to see up-to-date Debian packaging, but I think it would be a
> > challenge to keep it quite
> > I would be interested in hearing from folks here whether they percieve
> > a need for Debian packaging, or whether they prefer to "roll their
> > own"?
>
> I'd love to see up-to-date Debian packaging, but I think it would be a
> challenge to keep it quite as up-to-date as CVS. Perhaps a regul
>
> /opt is reserved ReadOnly on many systems. Debian boys told me that
> packages should go to /var/x and java stuff /usr/share/java .
>
> Java software on Linux is not really standard now.
What about spliting the package - /opt/tomcat for the JARs,
/var/log/tomcat for tomcat logs, /home/
I would like to see a debian package of Tomcat.
However, I'd also like to see a debian 1.2+ JDK *laugh*
Amy!
> -Original Message-
> From: Thom May [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, December 04, 2000 12:20 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re:
On Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 05:24:01 +, Andrew Savory said:
> On Mon, 4 Dec 2000, Thom May wrote:
>
> > I would be interested in hearing from folks here whether they percieve
> > a need for Debian packaging, or whether they prefer to "roll their
> > own"?
>
> I'd love to see up-to-date Debian pa
On Mon, 4 Dec 2000, Thom May wrote:
> I would be interested in hearing from folks here whether they percieve
> a need for Debian packaging, or whether they prefer to "roll their
> own"?
I'd love to see up-to-date Debian packaging, but I think it would be a
challenge to keep it quite as up-to-dat
Hi Henri,
on a similar note, I am currently beginning the long road into
the Debian project. I have already stated that I wish to take
over the packaging for Cocoon, and am currently debating whether to try
to do Tomcat as well. I would be interested in hearing from
folks here whether they perciev
>As a Linux user I would be more than happy to see this happen. RPM is a
>great tool that makes installing and maintaining a linux box
>very easy.
That's the goal ...
>My +1 on that, my only wish/concern is related with the
>locations of the
>files ( I have a very strong preference to /opt -
As a Linux user I would be more than happy to see this happen. RPM is a
great tool that makes installing and maintaining a linux box very easy.
My +1 on that, my only wish/concern is related with the locations of the
files ( I have a very strong preference to /opt - it allows multiple
versions
34 matches
Mail list logo
