Re: [POLL] aprize jk2

2002-09-26 Thread Henri Gomez
Eugene Gluzberg wrote: > I am against only because many apache 1.3 users (who installed apache > from RPMs, like me) will not be able to use jk2, unless there an easy > way to install apr libs/includes, etc on top of apache1.3 Is there? > Yes, working on it ;) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail

Re: [POLL] aprize jk2

2002-09-25 Thread Eugene Gluzberg
I am against only because many apache 1.3 users (who installed apache from RPMs, like me) will not be able to use jk2, unless there an easy way to install apr libs/includes, etc on top of apache1.3 Is there? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands,

Re: [POLL] aprize jk2

2002-09-25 Thread Costin Manolache
> I have just a question what happends with jni (we have to use the same > threads for JVM and Apache)? Yes. That's how the jni is designed to work - avoiding thread switching and doing all processing in the request thread ( just like mod_perl or mod_php would do it ) is important. However tha

RE: [POLL] aprize jk2

2002-09-25 Thread Mladen Turk
> From: Henri Gomez > > > > Nothing cannot use the JNI without APR even right now. > > We are attaching threads (that's the only way how it can be done). > > It's really a pain for example when using JNI from EBCDIC > systems like AS400 and BS2000 which need to have translation > of strings.

Re: [POLL] aprize jk2

2002-09-25 Thread jean-frederic clere
Henri Gomez wrote: > Mladen Turk wrote: > >> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: jean-frederic clere >>> I have always supported the use of APR. We should use it every where! >>> >>> I have just a question what happends with jni (we have to use the >>> same threads for JVM and Apache)? >>>

Re: [POLL] aprize jk2

2002-09-25 Thread Henri Gomez
Mladen Turk wrote: > >>-Original Message- >>From: jean-frederic clere >> >>I have always supported the use of APR. We should use it every where! >> >>I have just a question what happends with jni (we have to use >>the same threads >>for JVM and Apache)? >> > > > Nothing cannot use th

RE: [POLL] aprize jk2

2002-09-25 Thread Mladen Turk
> -Original Message- > From: jean-frederic clere > > I have always supported the use of APR. We should use it every where! > > I have just a question what happends with jni (we have to use > the same threads > for JVM and Apache)? > Nothing cannot use the JNI without APR even righ

Re: [POLL] aprize jk2

2002-09-25 Thread jean-frederic clere
Mladen Turk wrote: > I would like to make a poll (something non-obligatory as a vote) about > using apr/apr-util inside the jk2. The reason is quite simple, we have > lots of extra code that we either duplicate or just mimic. Since the APR > is already default for Apache2 and IIS, IMO there is no

Re: [POLL] aprize jk2

2002-09-23 Thread Remy Maucherat
Costin Manolache wrote: > Mladen Turk wrote: > > >>Hi, glad to see you rised from the death :) > > > Unfortunately - it's back from vacation. Welcome back anyway :) > Besides > getting in the right timezone, I have to get re-adjusted with > using a computer and reading mail... That sucks ;

Re: [POLL] aprize jk2

2002-09-23 Thread Henri Gomez
> +1 on using apr/apr-util - but I would preffer doing so for jk2.1. > > Let's tag/branch the workspace as jk2.0, with the current code ( as beta > level ), at the moment 4.1 is released. It is stable and works. > Imediately after we start on the main branch with the removal of the > old code, a

RE: [POLL] aprize jk2

2002-09-23 Thread Mladen Turk
> For (1) - it works for me :-) ( using ), and I did > at least once tested it with the 'normal' mapper, so it can't be > very far. If you give me more context info on what's broken - > I can try help with the fix. > It's pretty close to finish, hopefully later this day. > I'll look at 123

RE: [POLL] aprize jk2

2002-09-23 Thread Costin Manolache
Mladen Turk wrote: > Hi, glad to see you rised from the death :) Unfortunately - it's back from vacation. Besides getting in the right timezone, I have to get re-adjusted with using a computer and reading mail... >> Let's tag/branch the workspace as jk2.0, with the current >> code ( as beta >

RE: [POLL] aprize jk2

2002-09-23 Thread Mladen Turk
Hi, glad to see you rised from the death :) > -Original Message- > From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Costin Manolache > Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 12:35 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [POLL] aprize jk2 > > > +1 on using ap

Re: [POLL] aprize jk2

2002-09-23 Thread Costin Manolache
Mladen Turk wrote: > I would like to make a poll (something non-obligatory as a vote) about > using apr/apr-util inside the jk2. The reason is quite simple, we have > lots of extra code that we either duplicate or just mimic. Since the APR > is already default for Apache2 and IIS, IMO there is no

Re: [POLL] aprize jk2

2002-09-20 Thread Henri Gomez
Mladen Turk wrote: > I would like to make a poll (something non-obligatory as a vote) about > using apr/apr-util inside the jk2. The reason is quite simple, we have > lots of extra code that we either duplicate or just mimic. Since the APR > is already default for Apache2 and IIS, IMO there is no