> +1 on using apr/apr-util - but I would preffer doing so for jk2.1. > > Let's tag/branch the workspace as jk2.0, with the current code ( as beta > level ), at the moment 4.1 is released. It is stable and works. > Imediately after we start on the main branch with the removal of the > old code, and use the APR version.
+1 to put apr/apr-util in jk 2.1 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
