Henri Gomez wrote: > Mladen Turk wrote: > >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: jean-frederic clere >>> I have always supported the use of APR. We should use it every where! >>> >>> I have just a question what happends with jni (we have to use the >>> same threads for JVM and Apache)? >>> >> >> >> Nothing cannot use the JNI without APR even right now. >> We are attaching threads (that's the only way how it can be done). > > > While speaking JNI via APR, do you know if we could APR to hide > the JNI complexity ?
Not completly. The only way would be to add some JNI calls in APR. > > It's really a pain for example when using JNI from EBCDIC systems > like AS400 and BS2000 which need to have translation of strings. > > BTW, the latest release of APR is 0.9.1 but Apache 2.0.42 use APR > 0.9.2, are they compatible ? 0.9.2 is still in work. > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
