DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13477] - tomcat 4.1.2 installed from rpms fails to start

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13477 tomcat 4.1.2 installed from rpms fails to start [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RE

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13477] New: - tomcat 4.1.2 installed from rpms fails to start

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13477 tomcat 4.1.2 installed from rpms fails to start Summary: tomcat 4.1.2 installed from rpms fails to start Product: Tomcat 4 Version: 4.1.12 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity:

JK 2.0.1 for Linux (binaries and rpms) uploaded

JK 2.0.1 for Linux i386 binaries and rpms (including sources) are available : http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk2/release/v2.0.1/bin/linux/i386/ http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk2/release/v2.0.1/rpms/ Regards -- To unsubscribe, e-mail

Re: tomcat 4.1.9 rpms available

Legend! Bojan On Thu, 2002-08-22 at 18:37, Henri Gomez wrote: > The TC 4.1.9 beta rpms are available : > > http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4.1.9-beta/rpms/ > > Nota that we share now the rpms with the jpackage project (www.jpackage.org), so > fo

tomcat 4.1.9 rpms available

The TC 4.1.9 beta rpms are available : http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4.1.9-beta/rpms/ Nota that we share now the rpms with the jpackage project (www.jpackage.org), so for those of you who want to rebuild source rpms, you should go to jpackage site to get the

Re: jtc rpms

On Tue, 2002-08-20 at 18:56, Henri Gomez wrote: > Quoting Bojan Smojver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > On Tue, 2002-08-20 at 00:50, Henri Gomez wrote: > > > > Welcome back from holidays, > > Thanks > > > hope you had a good time... > > Rainy ;[ Sorry to hear that :-( > Yes, with latest Apache 2

Re: jtc rpms

he > > necessary binaries, for example Linux rpms & .so, windows, netware, iis > are > > welcome also. > > > > http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/snapshot/rpms/ > > > > We could have right now : > > > > > http:

Re: jtc rpms

On Tue, 2002-08-20 at 00:50, Henri Gomez wrote: Welcome back from holidays, hope you had a good time... > I propose to create a snapshot subdir in jtc, snapshot, and provide here the > necessary binaries, for example Linux rpms & .so, windows, netware, iis are > welcome al

jtc rpms

Hi to all, Many rpms users ask me for mod_jk/mod_jk2/mod_webapp rpms. Up to now they were released in tomcat4 release rpm subdir (against the jtc source tarball available at that time). What about putting the mod_jk/mod_jk2/mod_webapp rpms into another location to be sure they will not be

FW: apt-get rpms ?

... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 6:55 PM >To: Tomcat Developers List >Subject: apt-get rpms ? > > >Henri, > >Any chance you wi

apt-get rpms ?

Henri, Any chance you will apt-enable the jpackage.org repository ? I love apt-get ( the RPM version ), it saves you a lot of time ( unfortunately not too many sources ). Costin On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, GOMEZ Henri wrote: > BTW, all required OSS rpms needed to build tc 4.1.3 > are availa

RE: Required jar/rpms to build tomcat 4.1.3b1

>BTW, the licence on JMX_RI_1.1 seems slightly different from >the previous, it may ( or not ) be distributable. Any lawyer >wanting to become commiter on tomcat ? >( of course, using an open source product is better, but >again the terms on MX4J are still unclear wrt JCP test >requirements -

Re: Required jar/rpms to build tomcat 4.1.3b1

- Original Message - From: "GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 7:39 AM Subject: RE: Required jar/rpms to build tomcat 4.1.3b1 >> PureTLS ? No

Re: Required jar/rpms to build tomcat 4.1.3b1

"Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > CertificatesValve is used to fulfill the Servlet API requirement that the > certificate chain supplied by the client is exposed as a request attribute > (also the cipher suite and key size in Servlet 2.3). Currently, it's hard > coded to JSSE (i

Re: Required jar/rpms to build tomcat 4.1.3b1

On 7 Jun 2002, Eric Rescorla wrote: > > org.apache.catalina.net.SSLServerSocketFactory require JSSE. > > > > JCERT is needed by org.apache.catalina.valves.CertificatesValve. > Well, Ant is smart enough to not try to build these if you > don't have JSSE. I'm still not completely clear on the circum

Re: Required jar/rpms to build tomcat 4.1.3b1

On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote: > > So the required packages are : > > > > ant 1.4.1 > > xerces 2.0.1 > > xalan 2.3.1 > > Xalan is not required (yet). It was discussed on ant-dev, I believe it is required by the JAXP licence. If you could check ( in case you know someone working at S

Re: Required jar/rpms to build tomcat 4.1.3b1

"GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Hum, JSSE is still required in part of the code, outside HTTP > >> connector world. > >> > >> org.apache.catalina.net.SSLServerSocketFactory require JSSE. > >> > >> JCERT is needed by org.apache.catalina.valves.CertificatesValve. > >Well, Ant is sma

Re: Required jar/rpms to build tomcat 4.1.3b1

; > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Required jar/rpms to build tomcat 4.1.3b1 > > "GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > >> PureTLS ? Not yet in TC 4.x ... > > > > > >4.1 uses coyote which uses tomcat-utils, which works fine with &

RE: Required jar/rpms to build tomcat 4.1.3b1

>> Hum, JSSE is still required in part of the code, outside HTTP >> connector world. >> >> org.apache.catalina.net.SSLServerSocketFactory require JSSE. >> >> JCERT is needed by org.apache.catalina.valves.CertificatesValve. >Well, Ant is smart enough to not try to build these if you >don't have JS

RE: Required jar/rpms to build tomcat 4.1.3b1

> >I would include all of these. > >What's up with the daemon component BTW ? I could find a tarball but JF make a snap. Thanks for the reply, I know what I should get and what I could drop. BTW, I'll build with a SDK 1.3.1 for probably SDK 1.2/1.3 (the more common today on Linux world) -- To

Re: Required jar/rpms to build tomcat 4.1.3b1

"GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> PureTLS ? Not yet in TC 4.x ... > > > >4.1 uses coyote which uses tomcat-utils, which works fine with > >pureTLS. > >I assume it's just undocumented, I don't see a code > >problem ( with the coyote connector ). > > > > Hum, JSSE is still required

Re: Required jar/rpms to build tomcat 4.1.3b1

> So the required packages are : > > ant 1.4.1 > xerces 2.0.1 > xalan 2.3.1 Xalan is not required (yet). > These two are not required by JDK 1.3 and later > > jndi 1.2.1 (SUN LICENSE PROBLEM) > ldap/jaas 1.2.3 (SUN LICENSE PROBLEM) IMO, don't include them > servletapi 4 (or 2.3 depends how we

Re: Required jar/rpms to build tomcat 4.1.3b1

> >4.1 uses coyote which uses tomcat-utils, which works fine with > >pureTLS. BTW, PureTLS support is not included in this release (next one I promise :)). You'll have to rebuild Coyote from the source to get it. Remy -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional comma

Re: Required jar/rpms to build tomcat 4.1.3b1

(_)..oOOo... > PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 > > > > >>-Original Message- >>From: jean-frederic clere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 2:55 PM >>To: Tomcat Developers List >>Subject: Re: Requ

RE: Required jar/rpms to build tomcat 4.1.3b1

>> PureTLS ? Not yet in TC 4.x ... > >4.1 uses coyote which uses tomcat-utils, which works fine with >pureTLS. >I assume it's just undocumented, I don't see a code >problem ( with the coyote connector ). > Hum, JSSE is still required in part of the code, outside HTTP connector world. org.apa

RE: Required jar/rpms to build tomcat 4.1.3b1

On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, GOMEZ Henri wrote: > > > > >Bad and I though we had a substitution. > > PureTLS ? Not yet in TC 4.x ... 4.1 uses coyote which uses tomcat-utils, which works fine with pureTLS. I assume it's just undocumented, I don't see a code problem ( with the coyote connector ). Cost

RE: Required jar/rpms to build tomcat 4.1.3b1

: jean-frederic clere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 2:55 PM >To: Tomcat Developers List >Subject: Re: Required jar/rpms to build tomcat 4.1.3b1 > > >GOMEZ Henri wrote: >>>>Yes, but where is it ? >>> >>>In cvs for the momen

Re: Required jar/rpms to build tomcat 4.1.3b1

GOMEZ Henri wrote: >>>Yes, but where is it ? >> >>In cvs for the moment. >>Should I produce one and put it in a known place? > > > Yes, please ;) I have put it in http://www.apache.org/~jfclere/commons-daemon/ named commons-daemon.jar You can get it build in the TC by doing ant download. (that

RE: Required jar/rpms to build tomcat 4.1.3b1

>> Yes, but where is it ? > >In cvs for the moment. >Should I produce one and put it in a known place? Yes, please ;) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: Required jar/rpms to build tomcat 4.1.3b1

GOMEZ Henri wrote: >>Bad and I though we had a substitution. > > > PureTLS ? Not yet in TC 4.x ... > > But I remember PureTLS author, Eric Rescorla, wrote > something about work in progress some times ago... > > >>>Java Transaction API 1.0.1 or later (SUN LICENSE PROBLEM) >>> >>>Struts 1.0.1

RE: Required jar/rpms to build tomcat 4.1.3b1

> >Bad and I though we had a substitution. PureTLS ? Not yet in TC 4.x ... But I remember PureTLS author, Eric Rescorla, wrote something about work in progress some times ago... >> Java Transaction API 1.0.1 or later (SUN LICENSE PROBLEM) >> >> Struts 1.0.1 or later >> >> Tyrex Data Source

Re: Required jar/rpms to build tomcat 4.1.3b1

GOMEZ Henri wrote: > Hi, > > I've started digging around to make Tomcat 4.1.3 beta1 rpm > and you'll find later of required packages. > > jpackage project members get a copy of this mail since > they could have many of them allready available, and sus > we could use them. > > The problem with

Required jar/rpms to build tomcat 4.1.3b1

Hi, I've started digging around to make Tomcat 4.1.3 beta1 rpm and you'll find later of required packages. jpackage project members get a copy of this mail since they could have many of them allready available, and sus we could use them. The problem with Tomcat 4.1.3, in an OSS packaging pers

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6991] - Missing rpms for tomcat4 4.0.3

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6991 Missing rpms for tomcat4 4.0.3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED --- Additional Comment

[RPMINFO] Tomcat 4.0.3 rpms reuploaded

The TC 4.0.3 rpm have been reuploaded since there was a nasty problem in previous upload and only .asc file where present. Sorry for the disturbance. - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6991] - Missing rpms for tomcat4 4.0.3

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6991 Missing rpms for tomcat4 4.0.3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Reso

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6991] New: - Missing rpms for tomcat4 4.0.3

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6991 Missing rpms for tomcat4 4.0.3 Summary: Missing rpms for tomcat4 4.0.3 Product: Tomcat 4 Version: 4.0.3 Final Platform: All URL: http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat- 4.0/release/v4.0.

Security in Tomcat Webapps - WAS: Tomcat 4 / mod_webapp RPMs available...

I send a copy to tomcat-dev since it's an important issue >Thanks for getting back to me so quickly. The distributions you have >provided via jakarta have been very beneficial to us and our >project. We >are grateful so much work has gone into building RPM's. Thanks ;) >> Warning, the RPM g

RE: Tomcat 4 / mod_webapp RPMs available...

>We've been customizing the src rpm's available at: > >http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4. >0.1/rpms/ > >and the mod_webapp rpm at: > >http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4. >0.2-b2/rpms/ > >to prod

Tomcat 4 / mod_webapp RPMs available...

We've been customizing the src rpm's available at: http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4.0.1/rpms/ and the mod_webapp rpm at: http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4.0.2-b2/rpms/ to produce RPM's that our team feels are stab

Tomcat 3.3a RPMs updated

The Tomcat 3.3 rpms has been updated to release 2 to fix a problem with launchers configuration paths. http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.3/rpms/ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

RE: Tomcat 4.0 RPMs?

>> Jaxp and crimson are built from xml-commons and xml-crimson >( both are >> Apache packages ). We do check in binaries - which is consistent with >> apache licence, but anyone can built them from sources as well. In the RPM case, we use dependencies to have them included from allready installe

RE: Tomcat 4.0 RPMs?

>Hi Vic. We're currently trying to sort out the best way of >packaging a 4.0 RPM. >TC4 has quite a few external jar dependencies ... some optional, some >mandatory. We're kind of between a rock and a hard place with >both a few of the >RPM packaging policies as well as some jar redistributio

Re: Tomcat 4.0 RPMs?

oing to be as painless as we would like. If you are comfortable with building from source, and if you need anything other than a minimal build, the source might be your best bet. (You could also just download the binaries, of course.) I'm not even sure that an exact approach for TC4 RPMs

Tomcat 4.0 RPMs?

Hi. Will RPMs for Tomcat 4.0 be released on the web site any time soon? I have no problem installing from the tar but I'd prefer the RPM since that's how I installed the previous version. Thanks, -Vic

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3606] - Tomcat rpms are not FHS compliant

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3606 Tomcat rpms are not FHS compliant [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Reso

RE: [Bug 3606] New: - Tomcat rpms are not FHS compliant

>Obviously configuration should go in /etc and logging in >/var/log (helps with >logrotate) logrotate couldn't do anything with that tomcat logfile since Tomcat will keep using the initial file, even if that one has been renamed and gzipped. A real candidate for jakarta-service, to intercep

Re: [Bug 3606] New: - Tomcat rpms are not FHS compliant

Le 2001.09.14 11:10, GOMEZ Henri a écrit : > Could you stop mark as bug things which are only > just requests of features. Sorry, forgot about this one (did so for the others, though) -- Nicolas Mailhot

[Bug 3606] - Tomcat rpms are not FHS compliant

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3606 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|Normal |Enhancement

RE: [Bug 3606] New: - Tomcat rpms are not FHS compliant

>-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 11:08 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: [Bug 3606] New: - Tomcat rpms are not FHS compliant > > >http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3606 > >

[Bug 3606] New: - Tomcat rpms are not FHS compliant

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3606 Summary: Tomcat rpms are not FHS compliant Product: Tomcat 3 Version: 3.3 Beta 2 Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: Other

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Tomcat 3.2.2 beta 4 RPMS released

RPM available at : http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.2.2-beta-4/rpms/ Linux i386 mod_jk.so (EAPI and STDAPI) at : http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.2.2-beta-4/bin/li nux/i386/ - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED

RPMs

Hi Henri, Could you make sure that the RPMs included in the M1 are self-contained ? I installed a new machine, tried to use the RPMs - but they require xerces.rpm. I know where to find it, but other may have troubles :-) Costin

RE: INFO on mod_jk and RPMs ....

21, 2001 6:00 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: INFO on mod_jk and RPMs > >Direct linux binary : > >http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.2.1/ >bin/linux/i38 >6/ (mod_jk/jserv) >http://jakarta.apache.org/build

RE: INFO on mod_jk and RPMs ....

Maybe add them to the /builds/jakarta-tomcat/native-3.3/linux tree? Keith -Original Message- From: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 6:00 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: INFO on mod_jk and RPMs Direct linux binary

INFO on mod_jk and RPMs ....

/ I'll be or move rpms directory in bin to help users find it ? 2) I will provide binary for TC 3.2.1 as I do for TC 3.3-m1 : http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.3-m1/bin/linux/i3 86/ with both STD API and EAPI. I'll will also add a INFO about

Re: jaxp 1.0.1 and 1.1 RPMs

> >From: Rajiv Mordani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 9:50 PM > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: Re: jaxp 1.0.1 and 1.1 RPMs > > > > > >Hi Gomez, > > If you forward the RPMs to me or put them in a place where I can

RE: jaxp 1.0.1 and 1.1 RPMs

ROTECTED]] >Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 9:50 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: jaxp 1.0.1 and 1.1 RPMs > > >Hi Gomez, > If you forward the RPMs to me or put them in a place where I can >pick it up from, I'll try and get them hosted. No promises but will see

Re: jaxp 1.0.1 and 1.1 RPMs

Hi Gomez, If you forward the RPMs to me or put them in a place where I can pick it up from, I'll try and get them hosted. No promises but will see what I can do. - Rajiv -- :wq On Thu, 11 Jan 2001, GOMEZ Henri wrote: > Hi to all Suners. > > I finished some time ag

Re: jaxp 1.0.1 and 1.1 RPMs

on 1/11/01 8:16 AM, "GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So I'll stay with xerces-j much larger but redistribuable ?-) Yep. -jon - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECT

RE: jaxp 1.0.1 and 1.1 RPMs

t;To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: jaxp 1.0.1 and 1.1 RPMs > > >At 04:42 11/1/01 +0100, GOMEZ Henri wrote: >>Hi to all Suners. >> >>I finished some time ago RPM for jaxp 1.0.1 and jaxp 1.1 >EARLY ADOPTERs. >>Who could do something to

Re: jaxp 1.0.1 and 1.1 RPMs

At 04:42 11/1/01 +0100, GOMEZ Henri wrote: >Hi to all Suners. > >I finished some time ago RPM for jaxp 1.0.1 and jaxp 1.1 EARLY ADOPTERs. >Who could do something to have these RPMS available at Sun or Apache >site ? Unfortunately it's not legal to have jaxp1.1 available via

jaxp 1.0.1 and 1.1 RPMs

Hi to all Suners. I finished some time ago RPM for jaxp 1.0.1 and jaxp 1.1 EARLY ADOPTERs. Who could do something to have these RPMS available at Sun or Apache site ? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional

TC 3.3 and TC 4.0B1 RPMs

Hi, A quick note to say that RPM for TC 4.0B1 and latest TC 3.3 from CVS will be released tomorrow ;-) Another try will be apr, apr-utils and httpd 2.0 . For the latest I'll get the latest stuff from CVS, it is ok ? Regards "Pour la plupart des hommes, se corriger consiste à changer de défaut

jaxp 1.0.1 and 1.1 RPMs

Hi, A quick note to say that both jaxp 1.0.1 and 1.1ea RPM are available. But could I make then available to http://rpmized.free.fr/ ? A licence problem may be ? Also could you see at the next 'Jakarta Project Management Committee' was to do with all the RPMs I've released

Re: Tomcat RPMs

> I've been experimenting with your RPM files (and considering replacing > my custom-built ones with yours), and it looks like you set things up > in > a directory tree that makes a lot of sense if you're coming from a > RedHat environment as I am. Thanks. > One thi