Quoting Bojan Smojver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Tue, 2002-08-20 at 00:50, Henri Gomez wrote: > > Welcome back from holidays,
Thanks > hope you had a good time... Rainy ;[ > > > I propose to create a snapshot subdir in jtc, snapshot, and provide here > the > > necessary binaries, for example Linux rpms & .so, windows, netware, iis > are > > welcome also. > > > > http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/snapshot/rpms/ > > > > We could have right now : > > > > > http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/snapshot/v4.1.9-beta/ > > > rpms/ > > > > What do you think about that ? > > I think this is generally a good idea but I just wanted to clear another > possible source of confusion. Is there some sort of dependency between > modules and Apache 2.0.x versions? Yes, with latest Apache 2.0, modules should be compiled against the proper Apache 2.0, so if you have a mod_jk built against 2.0.39, you need to recompile it to make use of jk under Apache 2.0.40 ;( It will be a pain for many distributions and modules maintainers (binary), so I hope HTTP 2.0 team will relax it a little or consider version update and functionnalities updates. > I ran into this with mod_jk 1.2.0 > from CVS (i.e. had to rebuild the module when the version of Apache was > bumped from 2.0.39 to 2.0.40). I almost always do static linking, but I > was wandering if that applies to DSO's as well (my experience with > building PHP 4.2.2 tells me it does). If so, I think we should also > clearly mark what Apache version that particular module is for. Yes, ie mod_jk-1.2.0-apache-2.0.40.so > Also, do we need to tie JTC to a particular Tomcat version, like in your > example to 4.1.9? It didn't tie to tomcat version but rather to jtc snapshot ;) > My understanding is that the web server (Apache) part > doesn't care much about what's behind it, as long as it speaks the > correct protocol version. Maybe there should be a README file instead, > listing all known Tomcat version combos for a particular JTC version... I agree, and we refer to the jtc tag name instead of a particular tomcat version. You could use mod_jk 1.2.0 tagged at tc 4.1.9 time with tc 3.3.1 regards -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
