> See my post "DOC: Table of Contents" for more details. (More details than
> you want, probably :-)
Not a lot of comments so far... I guess Monday morning =)
- r
On Sat, Jul 07, 2001 at 09:37:55AM -0700, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
>
> We might not need to spend as much time on the generic "how to build a web
> application" stuff, now that other resources are available -- and focus on
> the stuff that is important for configuration, like all the stuff that
On Sat, 7 Jul 2001, Rob S. wrote:
> > One decision to be made when actually *writing* this thing is whether you
> > consider the servlet spec to be a "required reading" prerequisite or
> > not. I'd certainly vote for that, but you'll find that the current App
> > Developer's Guide does cover q
> One decision to be made when actually *writing* this thing is whether you
> consider the servlet spec to be a "required reading" prerequisite or
> not. I'd certainly vote for that, but you'll find that the current App
> Developer's Guide does cover quite a bit (but not all) of the material
> fr
On Wed, 4 Jul 2001, Rob S. wrote:
> 2) Web Application Developers' Guide
>
>- Things to know while developing with Tomcat. The web dev
> doesn't have to be an admin pro!
>
One decision to be made when actually *writing* this thing is whether you
consider the servlet spec to be a "r
On Wed, 4 Jul 2001, Robert Slifka wrote:
> More refinements... if i didn't quote it, I agree with it =) BTW, what
> does "AW" in a subject line mean? I see it all the time...
>
> 0) Introduction to the TC4 container
> ADD > - Requirements (JDK versions, extra libs?, etc.)
>
> 1) "User's G
;From: Alex Chaffee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 5:28 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: First day - RE: PROPOSAL: Tomcat docs
>
>
>
>> Question what about having a more detailed coverage of Tomcat's
>> architecture ?
>>
>&g
> Question what about having a more detailed coverage of Tomcat's
> architecture ?
>
> ie: How to write TC 3.3 Interceptors, write 4.0 filters, writing
> realms.
Yes, there needs to be a separate Developers' Guide. Here's my first
pass at that. I'll be revising my whole TOC as soon as I ge
Glenn,
Glenn Nielsen wrote:
>
> Antony Bowesman wrote:
> >
> > Glenn Nielsen wrote:
> > >
> > > Antony Bowesman wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > 8. Security
> > > >
> > > > How about
> > > > 8.1 Concepts - Explanation of J2EE and Java 2 security models
> > > > 8.2 Authentication with Realms
> > > > 8.2.
Antony Bowesman wrote:
>
> Glenn Nielsen wrote:
> >
> > Antony Bowesman wrote:
> > >
> > > > 8. Security
> > >
> > > How about
> > > 8.1 Concepts - Explanation of J2EE and Java 2 security models
> > > 8.2 Authentication with Realms
> > > 8.2.1 Simple realm
> > > 8.2.2 JDBC Realm
> > > 8.2.3 Custo
>11. Load-balancing
>that it can be done through mod_jserv and mod_jk>
mod_jserv support fault-tolerant and load-balancing mode.
original mod_jk support only load-balancing but a recent
patch (found in J-T-C) allow you to configure mod_jk
in fault-tolerant only. ie when you have a cluster of
tom
Glenn Nielsen wrote:
>
> Antony Bowesman wrote:
> >
> > > 8. Security
> >
> > How about
> > 8.1 Concepts - Explanation of J2EE and Java 2 security models
> > 8.2 Authentication with Realms
> > 8.2.1 Simple realm
> > 8.2.2 JDBC Realm
> > 8.2.3 Custom realms
> > 8.3 Authorization
> > 8.3.1 J2EE rol
Rob & Punky et al. -
This is so cool! I've been working on a TOC on the side for a few weeks,
but I see the time has come to let it out to play with the other TOCs :-)
I have a few big-picture editorial comments before I do.
The "installation" unit is the most crucial. I think there should be
Has everyone seen these articles: http://www.onjava.com/pub/ct/33 ?
Might be useful to link to from the doc.
"Rob S." wrote:
>
> Shown below are the results of today's content and organizational
> suggestions. It's still extreeemely rough, but this is the kind of stuff I
> like. We're making
Antony Bowesman wrote:
>
> Punky Tse wrote:
> >
> > Rob,
> > Please see below for rephrased version of Introduction and
> > Administrator Guide.
> >
> > I combined the Introduction and Administrator's Guide to Administrator
> > Guide. Actually this is my proposed TOC. And I believe that
Punky Tse wrote:
>
> Rob,
> Please see below for rephrased version of Introduction and
> Administrator Guide.
>
> I combined the Introduction and Administrator's Guide to Administrator
> Guide. Actually this is my proposed TOC. And I believe that we need
> separate document for differ
Rob,
Please see below for rephrased version of Introduction and Administrator
Guide.
>
> 0) Introduction
>
>- Why use tomcat, what does it do and what doesn't it do?
>- Feature list as from tomcat 3 and as from tomcat 4 (group together
> features and in which versions they appear/
"Rob S." wrote:
>
> Shown below are the results of today's content and organizational
> suggestions. It's still extreeemely rough, but this is the kind of stuff I
> like. We're making progress! =)
>
> - r
>
> 0) Introduction
>
>- Why use tomcat, what does it do and what doesn't it do?
>
Shown below are the results of today's content and organizational
suggestions. It's still extreeemely rough, but this is the kind of stuff I
like. We're making progress! =)
- r
0) Introduction
- Why use tomcat, what does it do and what doesn't it do?
- Feature list as from tomcat 3 and
> How about "(Web?) Application Developers' Guide", to more
> closely map to the
> servlet spec terminology. For the other bit, maybe "Container
> Architecture Guide".
> I think we should avoid the phrase "Tomcat Developer" since,
> as this mailing list
> proves, many application developers th
Robert Slifka typed the following on 09:45 AM 7/4/2001 -0400
>> 2) "" Can't think of a title =)
>> ^
>> Tomcat Webdeveloper Guide
>
>I think we do need to separate out the fact that there are a group of people
>who will developing/embedding/extending Tomcat, and a group of people that
>will be d
Has someone got any ideas of how we are gonna gather all the information? I
have some things that come to mind, which can be forgotten tomorrow ;-).
Maby by using the faq that was around in the jserv erra ;) and add entries
there? Or is someone already gonna be a mail repository for this?
Maby I c
efull (I think I made my point).
Mvgr,
Martin
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Slifka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2001 3:46 PM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: PROPOSAL: Tomcat docs
>
>
> More refinements... if i
More refinements... if i didn't quote it, I agree with it =) BTW, what
does "AW" in a subject line mean? I see it all the time...
0) Introduction to the TC4 container
ADD > - Requirements (JDK versions, extra libs?, etc.)
1) "User's Guide" (or "Administrator's")
> - Tomcat and different
...and thank you btw =) I'm getting more excited now since this is exactly
the type of discussion I hoped we would be in! (re: suggesting different
sections, etc.)
I'll just throw this out there and everyone can quote it, etc. It contains
a few of mine, and all of Martin's (spliced, relocated,
esday, July 04, 2001 2:47 PM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: PROPOSAL: Tomcat docs - was TC4 docs - can we end this?
>
>
> For the record, I'm going to keep track of the different proposals in a
> separate doc. For the TC docs - what to include, the glue, etc.
For the record, I'm going to keep track of the different proposals in a
separate doc. For the TC docs - what to include, the glue, etc.
I'm no longer participating in the "how do we store it or what format do we
use" discussion =)
- r
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin van den Bemt [m
27 matches
Mail list logo
