> How about "(Web?) Application Developers' Guide", to more
> closely map to the
> servlet spec terminology. For the other bit, maybe "Container
> Architecture Guide".
> I think we should avoid the phrase "Tomcat Developer" since,
> as this mailing list
> proves, many application developers think that since they are
> developing on
> Tomcat, they are Tomcat developers.
Agreed on all counts.
> As a side-rant, "tomcat-dev" is really a bad name for this
> list (and as a pattern
> for the other Jakarta lists), since a "Windows Developer"
> generally is someone
> who develops for rather than implements the Windows platform,
> ditto "Java
> Developer", etc. "tomcat-contrib", "struts-contrib", etc.
> would be much more
> intuitive.
I won't get into this ;)
- r
