Good morning,
> NormW wrote:
> > Good evening Bill, All...
> >
> >
> >>Please direct these comments to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - b.t.w., you
> >>can check out the latest httpd-2.0 HEAD and pick up the entire proxy
> >>solution (you must explicitly --enable-proxy-ajp and have the ajplib
> >>sources there
NormW wrote:
Good evening Bill, All...
Please direct these comments to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - b.t.w., you
can check out the latest httpd-2.0 HEAD and pick up the entire proxy
solution (you must explicitly --enable-proxy-ajp and have the ajplib
sources there too.)
Someone want to take a wack at NormW'
Good evening Bill, All...
> Please direct these comments to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - b.t.w., you
> can check out the latest httpd-2.0 HEAD and pick up the entire proxy
> solution (you must explicitly --enable-proxy-ajp and have the ajplib
> sources there too.)
>
> Someone want to take a wack at NormW's
Please direct these comments to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - b.t.w., you
can check out the latest httpd-2.0 HEAD and pick up the entire proxy
solution (you must explicitly --enable-proxy-ajp and have the ajplib
sources there too.)
Someone want to take a wack at NormW's observations?
At 02:31 AM 8/11/2004,
Greetings All,
1. The testing.
Trying a build of the current CVS of the new (ajp) proxy modules and get the
following error:
#File: proxy_ftp.c
#
#1896: proxy_hook_scheme_handler(ap_proxy_ftp_handler, NULL, NULL,
APR_HOOK_MIDDLE);
# Error:
^
# illegal implicit co
