Good evening Bill, All... > Please direct these comments to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - b.t.w., you > can check out the latest httpd-2.0 HEAD and pick up the entire proxy > solution (you must explicitly --enable-proxy-ajp and have the ajplib > sources there too.) > > Someone want to take a wack at NormW's observations? Bill, thanks for the interest... I can say that the 'problem' noted in proxy_ftp.c has been attended with a recent update from Mladen. A build on the current 2.1 CVS shows (for NetWare): - mod_proxy.c having trouble finding mod_status.h (in ../modules/generators), - the same problem mentioned previously with proxy_connect.c, (Errors at 375 see 26, 80) Bypassing these I now get: Calling NWGNUproxyftp Generating Release\proxyftp_cc.opt Compiling proxy_ftp.c Compiling proxy_util.c Compiling ../arch/netware/libprews.c Generating Release\proxyftp_link.opt Linking Release/proxyftp.nlm ### mwldnlm Linker Error: # Undefined symbol: 'ap_proxy_ssl_enable' # referenced from 'ap_proxy_connection_create' in proxy_util.o ### mwldnlm Linker Error: # Undefined symbol: 'ap_proxy_ssl_disable' # referenced from 'ap_proxy_connection_create' in proxy_util.o
As noted above, this is on a NetWare build... Norm > At 02:31 AM 8/11/2004, NormW wrote: > >Greetings All, > > > >1. The testing. > > > >Trying a build of the current CVS of the new (ajp) proxy modules and get the > >following error: > > > ># File: proxy_ftp.c > ># -------------------- > ># 1896: proxy_hook_scheme_handler(ap_proxy_ftp_handler, NULL, NULL, > >APR_HOOK_MIDDLE); > ># Error: > >^ > ># illegal implicit conversion from 'int (struct request_rec *, struct *, > >char *, const char *, unsigned short)' to > ># 'int (*)(struct request_rec *, struct proxy_worker *, struct *, char *, > >const char *, unsigned short)' > > > >There is a similar issue in proxy_connect.c at line 374. > > > >The one module that does build without issue is proxy_http.c. > > > >A check of the coding in proxy_http.c shows a handler structure of: > >int ap_proxy_http_handler(request_rec *r, > > proxy_worker *worker, > > proxy_server_conf *conf, > > char *url, > > const char *proxyname, > > apr_port_t proxyport); > > > >whereas those in proxy_ftp and proxy_connect.c have: > >int ap_proxy_ftp_handler(request_rec *r, > > proxy_server_conf *conf, > > char *url, > > const char *proxyhost, > > apr_port_t proxyport); > > > > > >If I add the "proxy_worker *worker" to both proxy_ftp and proxy_connect > >structures they build without issue. > >Any comments please? > > > >2. The looking. > > > >In proxy_ftp.c, can the "const char *proxyhost" be changed to "const char > >*proxyname" for consistency please? > > > >Regards, > >Norm > > > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
