NormW wrote:
Good evening Bill, All...
Please direct these comments to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - b.t.w., you
can check out the latest httpd-2.0 HEAD and pick up the entire proxy
solution (you must explicitly --enable-proxy-ajp and have the ajplib
sources there too.)
Someone want to take a wack at NormW's observations?
Bill, thanks for the interest...
I can say that the 'problem' noted in proxy_ftp.c has been attended with a
recent update from Mladen.
A build on the current 2.1 CVS shows (for NetWare):
- mod_proxy.c having trouble finding mod_status.h (in
../modules/generators),
- the same problem mentioned previously with proxy_connect.c, (Errors at 375
see 26, 80)
Bypassing these I now get:
Calling NWGNUproxyftp
Generating Release\proxyftp_cc.opt
Compiling proxy_ftp.c
Compiling proxy_util.c
Compiling ../arch/netware/libprews.c
Generating Release\proxyftp_link.opt
Linking Release/proxyftp.nlm
### mwldnlm Linker Error:
# Undefined symbol: 'ap_proxy_ssl_enable'
# referenced from 'ap_proxy_connection_create' in proxy_util.o
### mwldnlm Linker Error:
# Undefined symbol: 'ap_proxy_ssl_disable'
# referenced from 'ap_proxy_connection_create' in proxy_util.o
As noted above, this is on a NetWare build...
The code has been moved to httpd use [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Both routine are in mod_proxy.c... Something wrong in the build?
Norm
At 02:31 AM 8/11/2004, NormW wrote:
Greetings All,
1. The testing.
Trying a build of the current CVS of the new (ajp) proxy modules and get
the
following error:
# File: proxy_ftp.c
# --------------------
# 1896: proxy_hook_scheme_handler(ap_proxy_ftp_handler, NULL, NULL,
APR_HOOK_MIDDLE);
# Error:
^
# illegal implicit conversion from 'int (struct request_rec *, struct
*,
char *, const char *, unsigned short)' to
# 'int (*)(struct request_rec *, struct proxy_worker *, struct *, char
*,
const char *, unsigned short)'
There is a similar issue in proxy_connect.c at line 374.
The one module that does build without issue is proxy_http.c.
A check of the coding in proxy_http.c shows a handler structure of:
int ap_proxy_http_handler(request_rec *r,
proxy_worker *worker,
proxy_server_conf *conf,
char *url,
const char *proxyname,
apr_port_t proxyport);
whereas those in proxy_ftp and proxy_connect.c have:
int ap_proxy_ftp_handler(request_rec *r,
proxy_server_conf *conf,
char *url,
const char *proxyhost,
apr_port_t proxyport);
If I add the "proxy_worker *worker" to both proxy_ftp and proxy_connect
structures they build without issue.
Any comments please?
2. The looking.
In proxy_ftp.c, can the "const char *proxyhost" be changed to "const char
*proxyname" for consistency please?
Regards,
Norm
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
