DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10229] New: - Request parameters lost after authenticated through login page

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

Re: JDBCStore implementation

> Hi Bob, > > Thanks for your answer! > > Well, I agree that the refered field in the database would fit perfectly > in the case of having more than one instance of Tomcat handling requests, > but why can't it be used for the "local" session handling as well? > > > About what you wrote: "Onc

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8552] - malformed URL upon second redirect

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: HA tomcat ( was: RE: 5.0 proposal)

Dunlop, Aaron wrote: > Mathias, > > It would be great to see some details on your experiences with > load-balancing Tomcat, and any tricks you've come up with would be much > appreciated by the community (well, at least my part of it ;) > > We also run Tomcat 4.0 in production, behind a hardware

RE: HA tomcat ( was: RE: 5.0 proposal)

Mathias, It would be great to see some details on your experiences with load-balancing Tomcat, and any tricks you've come up with would be much appreciated by the community (well, at least my part of it ;) We also run Tomcat 4.0 in production, behind a hardware load balancer. It's working great

Re: HA tomcat ( was: RE: 5.0 proposal)

On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, Huy Tran wrote: > Mathias, > > Thanks for the encouraged news. We've been using Tomcat in our product > for a while now. Now, I need to set it up with support for minimum 100K > simultaneous connection to our server side. If you could share some of > your knowledge how

Separating Tomcat and Apache configuration

We're trying to come up with a way to use Tomcat integrated with Apache in our production enviroment. In this environment, we have "service" managers and "system" managers. There may be multiple services (and hence multiple service managers) per machine. And there'd be one Tomcat instance per

mod_jk JkAutoMount

Anyone know anything about the mod_jk directive JkAutoMount? I've seen some about it in the documentation, in the source, and via a web search, but it's all a little bit sketchy. It sounds like it can be used instead of JkMount, to have the web server query the servlet container for what URL's i

Re: HA tomcat ( was: RE: 5.0 proposal)

Mathias, Thanks for the encouraged news. We've been using Tomcat in our product for a while now. Now, I need to set it up with support for minimum 100K simultaneous connection to our server side. If you could share some of your knowledge how you did it with your site, it would be tremendous

[PATCH] Patch to allow more flexible WebdavServlet/DefaultServlet operation

Two patches attached, catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/servlets/DefaultServlet.java catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/servlets/WebdavServlet.java There are two main pieces to this patch: 1) The addition of an "isDefaultServlet" initialization parameter to the WebdavServlet Thi

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10225] New: - ANT Tasks Error Situation

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

Re: HA tomcat ( was: RE: 5.0 proposal)

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, GOMEZ Henri wrote: > > > >> Pier could you detail what should be a Tomcat HA, and how > > >> it could fit in TC 5.0 proposal ? > > > > > >As far as I can remember it was voted -1... > > > > What about TC 5.0 with HA capability ? > > TC5.0 will h

Re: Configuring mod_jk2

While documenting the jk2 config, it would be _very_ usefull to make some notes on how we can improve the configuration in future. My goal was (is) to eventually support a preferences-like configuration, with multiple backends ( including directory services and win32 registry ). The model us

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10153] - Tomcat 4.0.4 requires that crimson.jar be in $TOMCAT_HOME/common/lib

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

Re: HA tomcat ( was: RE: 5.0 proposal)

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, GOMEZ Henri wrote: > > Pier could you detail what should be a Tomcat HA, and how it could fit in TC 5.0 proposal ? >>> >>>As far as I can remember it was voted -1... >> >>What about TC 5.0 with HA capability ? > > > TC5.0 will have a 'hig

RE: HA tomcat ( was: RE: 5.0 proposal)

On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, John Trollinger wrote: > Although Pier is sometimes harsh with his words he does have some valid > points. I would be nice for tomcat to be somewhat modular so if all you > want is a servlet engine just get those components. This also goes with > moving the CVS repositories

Re: 5.0 proposal

I'm interested in this Tomcat HA also. If you have a plan, please send it out. I'm willing to help. GOMEZ Henri wrote: >>>As somebody who also intends to use Tomcat in production (around 10 >>>different sites with a reasonable load, maybe 1/4 of vnunet) >>> >>> >>this would be >> >

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10220] - tags data not being cleared after tag executes

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

Re: 5.0 proposal

- Original Message - From: "Pier Fumagalli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 3:36 PM Subject: Re: 5.0 proposal > Arshad Mahmood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > +100! > > > > As somebody who also intends to use Tomcat in p

RE: HA tomcat ( was: RE: 5.0 proposal)

On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, John Trollinger wrote: > Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 13:19:40 -0400 > From: John Trollinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: 'Tomcat Developers List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: HA tomcat ( was: RE: 5.0 proposal) > > Althoug

Re: JDBCStore implementation

See intermixed. On Tue, 25 Jun 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 18:34:43 +0200 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: JDBCStore implementation > > "Craig R. McClanahan"

RE: HA tomcat ( was: RE: 5.0 proposal)

Although Pier is sometimes harsh with his words he does have some valid points. I would be nice for tomcat to be somewhat modular so if all you want is a servlet engine just get those components. This also goes with moving the CVS repositories.. so you can get only the modules you want and build

RE: Configuring mod_jk2

> -Original Message- > > > > The RegisterNatives is the JNI way that we are using to force the > > mod_jk2 to register its native methods instead of using that from > > Java, so that we don't need to explicitly use the > System.loadLibrary. > > > > The option can be enabled with the d

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10220] - tags data not being cleared after tag executes

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

Re: 5.0 proposal

On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, Pier Fumagalli wrote: > > http://nagoya.apache.org/svn/jakarta-tomcat-ha/ > > If you guys don't want to see it associated with the Apache name, just let > me know and I will move it off on my (Betaversion or VNU) servers. If possible, please also change the name - unless A

Re: 5.0 proposal

GOMEZ Henri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Pier could you detail what should be a Tomcat HA, and how >>> it could fit in TC 5.0 proposal ? >> >> As far as I can remember it was voted -1... > > What about TC 5.0 with HA capability ? Well... It's a matter of code... Given that there is not one l

HA tomcat ( was: RE: 5.0 proposal)

On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, GOMEZ Henri wrote: > >> Pier could you detail what should be a Tomcat HA, and how > >> it could fit in TC 5.0 proposal ? > > > >As far as I can remember it was voted -1... > > What about TC 5.0 with HA capability ? TC5.0 will have a 'higher availability' then 4.1 which is b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10018] - Socket exception (AJP1.3 and Coyote JK2)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

Mod_jk

Has anyone had this problem with any success? platform: Windows 2000 Professional Jakarta Tomcat 4.1.3 Apache 2.0.39 Mod_jk.dll connector My_Sql 4.0.1 I have a successful connection between Tomcat and Apache via the mod_jk module. All JSP's are displaying with the appropriate data from MySql.

Re: JDBCStore implementation

"Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 25.06.2002 18:08 Please respond to "Tomcat Developers List" To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: Subject:Re: JDBCStore implementation Hello Craig, On Mon, 24 Jun 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Dat

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6279] - Resubmit to j_security_check mistakenly fetches a page of that name

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: JDBCStore implementation

Hi Bob, Thanks for your answer! Well, I agree that the refered field in the database would fit perfectly in the case of having more than one instance of Tomcat handling requests, but why can't it be used for the "local" session handling as well? About what you wrote: "Once a session is marked

jasper2

hey remy, did this CVS commit http://www.mail-archive.com/tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org/msg29253.html, fix the bug where "FileNotFoundException" is thrown because the working directory was deleted for force a refresh? peter -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For addition

Re: JDBCStore implementation

On Mon, 24 Jun 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 16:34:12 +0200 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: JDBCStore implementation > > Hello everyone, > > I am writing about an issue on invalidation o

RE: 5.0 proposal

>> Pier could you detail what should be a Tomcat HA, and how >> it could fit in TC 5.0 proposal ? > >As far as I can remember it was voted -1... What about TC 5.0 with HA capability ? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: more on memory leak 4.1.5

peter lin wrote: > > hey Remy, > > > I did some more test and here is a bit more info. I tested jasper2 with > 4.0.3 and the is NO memory leak there. In fact the memory profile is > more stable than jasper1. Also, the CPU usage profile is much more > stable with jasper2 with tomcat 4.0.3, so I

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10220] - tags data not being cleared after tag executes

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10212] - I can't set up the Coyote Connector to run in HTTPS mode

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10220] New: - tags data not being cleared after tag executes

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

Re: 5.0 proposal

GOMEZ Henri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> As somebody who also intends to use Tomcat in production (around 10 >>> different sites with a reasonable load, maybe 1/4 of vnunet) >> this would be >>> very helpful to me. >>> >>> You mentioned a couple of specific things you would like to >> do. Woul

Re: random BOUND socket (was Re: 5.0 proposal).

GOMEZ Henri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We add a timeout features in mod_jk 1.2.0 to close > sockets after some time of inactivity I don't think it's JK, as I don't use it. Must be something somewhere else. Pier -- [Perl] combines all the worst aspects of C and Lisp: a billion of dif

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10212] - I can't set up the Coyote Connector to run in HTTPS mode

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

RE: 5.0 proposal

>> As somebody who also intends to use Tomcat in production (around 10 >> different sites with a reasonable load, maybe 1/4 of vnunet) >this would be >> very helpful to me. >> >> You mentioned a couple of specific things you would like to >do. Would it be >> possible for you elaborate a little

Re: Configuring mod_jk2

On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 01:13:02PM +0200, Mladen Turk wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Simon Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: 25. lipanj 2002 12:57 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: Configuring mod_jk2 > > > > > > Mladen also mentioned the "RegisterNatives" d

RE: random BOUND socket (was Re: 5.0 proposal).

We add a timeout features in mod_jk 1.2.0 to close sockets after some time of inactivity :) - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10212] - I can't set up the Coyote Connector to run in HTTPS mode

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

Re: random BOUND socket (was Re: 5.0 proposal).

jean-frederic clere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I do see the following on my Linux: > +++ > tcp0 0 :::127.0.0:http-alt :::127.0.0.1:32893 TIME_WAIT > tcp0 0 :::127.0.0.1:32892 :::127.0.0.1:8005 TIME_WAIT > tcp0 0 :::127.0.0.1:32894

Re: 5.0 proposal

Arshad Mahmood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +100! > > As somebody who also intends to use Tomcat in production (around 10 > different sites with a reasonable load, maybe 1/4 of vnunet) this would be > very helpful to me. > > You mentioned a couple of specific things you would like to do. Would

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10212] New: - I can't set up the Coyote Connector to run in HTTPS mode

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

more on memory leak 4.1.5

hey Remy, I did some more test and here is a bit more info. I tested jasper2 with 4.0.3 and the is NO memory leak there. In fact the memory profile is more stable than jasper1. Also, the CPU usage profile is much more stable with jasper2 with tomcat 4.0.3, so I doubt it is purely jasper2, thou

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/commonjk_channel_socket.c

On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, jean-frederic clere wrote: > GOMEZ Henri wrote: > > I allways use read/write on Unix instead of recv/send. > > It works way better. > > Why better? > recv/send on BS2000 goes directly to the network through the socket libraries > and read/write does with an additional POSIX

Re: Configuring mod_jk2

On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, jean-frederic clere wrote: > Mladen Turk wrote: > > Hi, > > Perhaps we should explain the new RegisterNatives directive 'inprocess', > > cause it will register all the needed interfaces by itself... > > > > 12. This begs the question: how is mod_jk2 configured. It's done usi

Re: Configuring mod_jk2

Mladen Turk wrote: > >>-Original Message- >>From: jean-frederic clere >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>Sent: 25. lipanj 2002 11:48 >>To: Tomcat Developers List >>Subject: Re: Configuring mod_jk2 >> >> >>Mladen Turk wrote: >> >>>Hi, >>>Perhaps we should explain the new RegisterNatives dire

RE: [Bench] mod_jk cache and socket timeout

Sure, these are not the results of the first runs ;-) > -Original Message- > From: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 10:06 AM > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: RE: [Bench] mod_jk cache and socket timeout > > > If you replay the bench many times

Virtual Directory ?Configure.

Dear Freinds I am working on the LINUX 7.2 , Apache webserver and Tomcat version 4.0.3 If I test all the examples they run perfectly well. http://172.16.10.98:8080/index.html http://172.16.10.98:8080/examples/jsp/index.html http://172.16.10.98:8080/examples/servlets/index.html All these wo

RE: Configuring mod_jk2

> -Original Message- > From: Simon Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 25. lipanj 2002 12:57 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Configuring mod_jk2 > > > Mladen also mentioned the "RegisterNatives" directive > "inprocess". I'm about to go searching through the archives > of

RE: Configuring mod_jk2

> -Original Message- > From: jean-frederic clere > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 25. lipanj 2002 11:48 > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: Re: Configuring mod_jk2 > > > Mladen Turk wrote: > > Hi, > > Perhaps we should explain the new RegisterNatives directive > > 'inprocess

RE: Configuring mod_jk2

Just joined the list after Gomez Henri cc'd the mod_jk2 howto that I've been working here. If any of you want to correct any mistakes, or suggest areas where a little explanation wouldn't go amiss, please let me know. I'm now subscribed to this list, so there's no need to mail me directly (though

tomcat 4.0.4 rpm release

Available at : http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4.0.4/rpms/ This rpm use external rpms from the Jpackage Project (http://www.jpackage.org) Only needed binary rpm will be present in jakarta rpms directory : jakarta-commons-logging-1.0.1.cvs20020612-1jpp.noarch.rpm re

Re: Configuring mod_jk2

Mladen Turk wrote: > Hi, > Perhaps we should explain the new RegisterNatives directive 'inprocess', > cause it will register all the needed interfaces by itself... > > 12. This begs the question: how is mod_jk2 configured. It's done using > > # Dynamic library > serverRoot=/usr/local

random BOUND socket (was Re: 5.0 proposal).

Remy Maucherat wrote: > Pier Fumagalli wrote: > >> Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >>> I don't see that much to remove. I assume JNDI is the ever popular >>> target, but I didn't notice it causing major problems (either >>> performance or reliability), so I'd say it's not worth it

RE: 5.0 proposal

>> I am really sorry, but you have only yourself to blame for not at least upgrading to Tomcat 3.3.x, which is the HA version of Tomcat 3.2. yip, I know, i'm dowloading it as i send this :-) -Original Message- From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 June 2002 09:45 To: T

RE: 5.0 proposal

I'm also very interested in hearing more about Tomcat HA. Speaking about HIGH AVAILABILITY, is linked to reliability and scalabitity. reliability should be provided by Tomcat core but scalability should be provided by some sorts of software between end-user and Tomcat's core. As I said yester

Re: 5.0 proposal

Steven Wood wrote: > Hi all, > > I was interested to read the differing opinions on 5.0 or not, and I was > interested to hear Pier say that he did not think tomcat was an option in a > production system. We have been using tomcat 3.2.3 (an out of date version > I know) and while it performs it

RE: Configuring mod_jk2

Hi, Perhaps we should explain the new RegisterNatives directive 'inprocess', cause it will register all the needed interfaces by itself... 12. This begs the question: how is mod_jk2 configured. It's done using # Dynamic library serverRoot=/usr/local/apache2 # load the jni library

RE: 5.0 proposal

Hi all, I was interested to read the differing opinions on 5.0 or not, and I was interested to hear Pier say that he did not think tomcat was an option in a production system. We have been using tomcat 3.2.3 (an out of date version I know) and while it performs it very well under a light load, s

Re: 5.0 proposal

Pier Fumagalli wrote: > Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>I don't see that much to remove. I assume JNDI is the ever popular >>target, but I didn't notice it causing major problems (either >>performance or reliability), so I'd say it's not worth it. > > > Actually, I have a compl

Re: 5.0 proposal

- Original Message - From: "Pier Fumagalli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 9:49 PM Subject: Re: 5.0 proposal > [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, Pier Fumagalli wrote: > > > >> That's

RE: [Bench] mod_jk cache and socket timeout

If you replay the bench many times, you'll see that the number will change a little. Not a performance gain, a sort of chaos-random addition ;) - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fin

RE: mod_jk cache and socket timeout

Ok, we'll have now to update mod_jk HOWTO to reflect these changes - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 >-Original Message-

FW: Configuring mod_jk2

Contributed documentation for jk2 PS: Note the info that Jetty will also implements ajp13 :) >-Original Message- >From: Simon Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 3:24 AM >To: GOMEZ Henri >Subject: Re: Configuring mod_jk2 > > >Attached is a copy of the notes t

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common jk_channel_socket.c

>GOMEZ Henri wrote: >> I allways use read/write on Unix instead of recv/send. >> It works way better. > >Why better? >recv/send on BS2000 goes directly to the network through the >socket libraries >and read/write does with an additional POSIX layer. Hi JF, History, history ;) I switched from

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10204] New: - JAR_CACHExxxxx.tmp files created in tmp directory

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common jk_channel_socket.c

GOMEZ Henri wrote: > I allways use read/write on Unix instead of recv/send. > It works way better. Why better? recv/send on BS2000 goes directly to the network through the socket libraries and read/write does with an additional POSIX layer. > > - > Henri Gomez ___[_] > EMA