Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/native/mod_jk/common jk_uri_worker_map.c

James I'm no expert on this matter (I don't use Apache), but here's my 2c. The problem is you have two apps "competing" for mapping of URLs. We wish to centralise it inside tomcat (in web.xml), and have the minimum amount of config in the apache.conf as possible. Thus, we avoid the solution you

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/native/mod_jk/common jk_uri_worker_map.c

Many thanks, I was wondering why both the mod_jk module and IIS isapi act as filters instead of an Apache handler or an IIS application respectively. In their current implementation they scan all request URIs for ones that they are responsible for and then, in the case of Apache anyway, r

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core ApplicationContext.java

remm01/01/22 22:14:20 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core ApplicationContext.java Log: - Should fix watchdog failure in /servlet-tests/GetResource_1Test. A URL object was returned regardless of the existence of a resource at the r

Re: Tomcat 4.0 merge done

Remy Maucherat wrote: > I've just completed the merge, which was way easier to do than what I > expected. > > Feel free to send bugs reports / comments ... > Remy, the new code causes three Watchdog-4.0 test fails: /jsp-tests/jsp/tagext/tld_resource_path/positive_JAR_URI.jsp /jsp-tests/jsp/tage

Tomcat 4.0 merge done

I've just completed the merge, which was way easier to do than what I expected. Feel free to send bugs reports / comments ... Remy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/tests/webpages/WEB-INF test-tomcat.xml

costin 01/01/22 21:08:40 Modified:src/admin/WEB-INF admin.tld src/share/org/apache/tomcat/core Response.java src/share/org/apache/tomcat/modules/config PolicyInterceptor.java src/share/org/apache/tomcat/modules/server

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup Bootstrap.java Catalina.java ContextConfig.java

remm01/01/22 21:05:52 Modified:catalina/src/conf server.xml catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina Container.java catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core ApplicationContext.java ContainerBase.java Stan

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/servlets DefaultServlet.java LocalStrings.properties WebdavServlet.java

remm01/01/22 20:47:57 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/servlets DefaultServlet.java LocalStrings.properties WebdavServlet.java Log: - Backport from 4.1. - Update DefaultServlet and WebdavServlet to use the director

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina Globals.java

remm01/01/22 20:45:10 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina Globals.java Log: - Add a new constant, which indicates the location of the resources in the servlet context. Revision ChangesPath 1.18 +13 -5 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/or

RE: Call for volunteers

Costin, I can help with the following items: 2. Bug reports/verification: we have a large number of bug reports, most of them against previous versions of tomcat. We need people to look at the bugs, try to reproduce them in the proposed 3.3, try to fix them. If possible, we need a simple reprod

Re: [PROPOSAL] Revised Tomcat 4.0-beta-2 Release Plan

Craig R. McClanahan typed the following on 04:51 PM 1/22/2001 -0800 >* Integrate the changes for persistent session storage, as well as > session passivation and activation, proposed by Kief Morris. This > will initially be checked into a temporary branch for experimentation, > but will likely

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/connector/http10 Constants.java HttpConnector.java HttpProcessor.java HttpRequestImpl.java HttpResponseImpl.java LocalStrings.properties

remm01/01/22 19:55:55 Added: catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/connector/http10 Constants.java HttpConnector.java HttpProcessor.java HttpRequestImpl.java HttpResponseImpl.java LocalStrings.properties Lo

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/connector/http HttpConnector.java HttpProcessor.java HttpRequestStream.java SocketInputStream.java

remm01/01/22 19:53:01 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/connector/http HttpConnector.java HttpProcessor.java HttpRequestStream.java SocketInputStream.java Log: - Backports : - SIS doesn't extend BufferedInputStream.

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/naming/factory Constants.java EjbFactory.java ResourceEnvFactory.java ResourceFactory.java TransactionFactory.java

remm01/01/22 19:43:55 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/naming/factory Constants.java EjbFactory.java ResourceEnvFactory.java ResourceFactory.java TransactionFactory.java Log: - Portback the pluggability enhancements for the J

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/naming/resources - New directory

remm01/01/22 19:39:32 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/naming/resources - New directory - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/connector/http10 - New directory

remm01/01/22 19:28:44 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/connector/http10 - New directory - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/native/mod_jk/common jk_uri_worker_map.c

danmil 01/01/22 19:23:03 Modified:src/native/mod_jk/common jk_uri_worker_map.c Log: Adding more thorough DEBUG-level to describe what mapping the module is using for a given request. Submitted by: James Courtney Revision ChangesPath 1.3 +18 -6 jakarta-t

Re: [PROPOSAL] Revised Tomcat 4.0-beta-2 Release Plan

"Craig R. McClanahan" wrote: > > Over the last week or so, there has been some interest in changes to Tomcat > 4.0-beta-1, including some changes in fundamental APIs within Catalina. It > would be desireable to make these changes before a 4.0 release is completed, so > that we can strive to main

JDBCRealm - can't make it work

Hello Sir,   I am trying to use Tomcat-3.2.1 and Apache_1.3.14 with MySQL-3.23.31 under RedHatLinux 6.2 Tomcat, Apache and MySQL are basically working fine and jdk1.3 is installed under /usr/java. I have to make Tomcat accessing data from MySQL (name of database is test) and I am having lack

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/valves AccessLogValve.java CertificatesValve.java RemoteAddrValve.java RemoteHostValve.java RequestDumperValve.java RequestFilterValve.java ValveBase.java

craigmcc01/01/22 18:53:04 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/authenticator AuthenticatorBase.java SingleSignOn.java catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/valves AccessLogValve.java CertificatesValve.java

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup ContextConfig.java

craigmcc01/01/22 18:52:01 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup ContextConfig.java Log: Third of four commits for the Valve API change. Changes reflect the fact that the Context implementation delegates to a Pipeline implementation, r

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core StandardPipeline.java ContainerBase.java LocalStrings.properties StandardContext.java StandardContextValve.java StandardEngine.java StandardEngineValve.java StandardHost.java StandardHostValve.java StandardWrapper.java StandardWrapperValve.java

craigmcc01/01/22 18:51:17 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core ContainerBase.java LocalStrings.properties StandardContext.java StandardContextValve.java StandardEngine.java StandardEngineValve.java

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina Contained.java ValveContext.java Pipeline.java Valve.java

craigmcc01/01/22 18:49:38 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina Pipeline.java Valve.java Added: catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina Contained.java ValveContext.java Log: First of several check-ins that implement th

Re: [PROPOSAL] Revised Tomcat 4.0-beta-2 Release Plan

> * POSSIBLE ITEM: Tweak the lifecycle APIs so that we can implement > running Catalina under the "invocation" interface in the services directory. > Among other things, this will allow running Tomcat 4.0 stand alone on > port 80, without having to run as root. (No volunteer yet to work on

Re: [PROPOSAL] Revised Tomcat 4.0-beta-2 Release Plan

+ 1 for the plan, and I will assist as indicated "Craig R. McClanahan" wrote: > > Over the last week or so, there has been some interest in changes to Tomcat > 4.0-beta-1, including some changes in fundamental APIs within Catalina. It > would be desireable to make these changes before a 4.0 rel

Re: [PROPOSAL] Revised Tomcat 4.0-beta-2 Release Plan

on 1/22/01 5:28 PM, "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> It's in the "miscellaneous fixes" section :-). >> >> Now, which part does your +1 imply you are going to help on? :-) > > If I read well, it's "everything", right ? ;)) > > Remy I will help test your miscellaneous fixes. :-)

Re: [PROPOSAL] Revised Tomcat 4.0-beta-2 Release Plan

> Jon Stevens wrote: > > > on 1/22/01 4:51 PM, "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > Therefore, I would like to propose "unfreezing" the 4.0 codebase, and opening > > > it > > > again to new development, with some of the major items listed below. The > > > revised release

Re: [PROPOSAL] Revised Tomcat 4.0-beta-2 Release Plan

Jon Stevens wrote: > on 1/22/01 4:51 PM, "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Therefore, I would like to propose "unfreezing" the 4.0 codebase, and opening > > it > > again to new development, with some of the major items listed below. The > > revised release plan for Tomcat

Re: [PROPOSAL] Revised Tomcat 4.0-beta-2 Release Plan

on 1/22/01 4:51 PM, "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Therefore, I would like to propose "unfreezing" the 4.0 codebase, and opening > it > again to new development, with some of the major items listed below. The > revised release plan for Tomcat 4.0 Beta 2 would then become: >

RE: Forming an opinion

> -Original Message- > From: Jon Stevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2001 01:35 > > ... > > How about discussing what to do when a developer goes and does > whatever the > fuck he wants to do regardless of what everyone else voted and agreed on? > > -jon >

Re: Forming an opinion

with all my respect and the truth from my heart, in case you didn't read the "Newbie" email, I would recommend trying to focus on the dev issues, and maybe create another list for the guidelines and standards and meetings. ---8<-- To all on

[PROPOSAL] Revised Tomcat 4.0-beta-2 Release Plan

Over the last week or so, there has been some interest in changes to Tomcat 4.0-beta-1, including some changes in fundamental APIs within Catalina. It would be desireable to make these changes before a 4.0 release is completed, so that we can strive to maintain API compatibility, to the maximum d

Re: Forming an opinion

"Anil Vijendran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Geoff Soutter wrote: > > > JDD said essentially the same thing, it's weird, on one hand I hate to see > > people getting upset but on the other hand I can't see how we can provide a > > kind of "virtual padded room" where we can prevent people getti

Re: Forming an opinion

on 1/22/01 4:33 PM, "Anil Vijendran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Its not that someone is opiniated that bothers me, its how it is conveyed. Are you still discussing this issue? I thought you said you were going to stop. How about discussing what to do when a developer goes and does whatever th

RE: Call for volunteers

I have reconsidered, and I also believe I will have time to work on the core and help clean up/document the code. If Tomcat 3.3 gets a chance to run I'll put as much time as I can afford into it. Regards, Mike > -Original Message- > From: Michael Percy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent:

Re: Forming an opinion

Geoff Soutter wrote: > JDD said essentially the same thing, it's weird, on one hand I hate to see > people getting upset but on the other hand I can't see how we can provide a > kind of "virtual padded room" where we can prevent people getting offended > without seeming very autocratic. I share

RE: Forming an opinion

I hardly think that we all need to have that warm fuzzy feeling all the time towards one another or that our ego's need to be shielded from having our ideas challenged but clearly minimum standards of behavior between group members should be agreed upon and observed for the health of the project.

Re: bug in 4.0

Jon Stevens wrote: > Ok, I replaced the turbine.jar in my WEB-INF/lib directory with a new one > while the server was running. On the next request to the server, I was > presented with this nice stacktrace... > > Seems like it should be able to handle this a bit better. :-) > Yep, it should. Cu

Re: Forming an opinion

"Peter Donald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > At 11:08 23/1/01 +1100, Geoff Soutter wrote: > >Any ideas how we can effectively deal with opinionated people without > >muzzling them? > > don't bother responding to them unless they do things the right way. email > them OFF list stating this in a v

Re: Forming an opinion

At 11:08 23/1/01 +1100, Geoff Soutter wrote: >Any ideas how we can effectively deal with opinionated people without >muzzling them? don't bother responding to them unless they do things the right way. email them OFF list stating this in a very diplomatic way. Watch them explode and then hopefull

bug in 4.0

Ok, I replaced the turbine.jar in my WEB-INF/lib directory with a new one while the server was running. On the next request to the server, I was presented with this nice stacktrace... Seems like it should be able to handle this a bit better. :-) -jon A Servlet Exception Has Occurred Exception

Re: Forming an opinion

"Scott Stirling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > As Kurt Schrader smartly said: > > > "The last thing > > we need is the idea police here to make sure that no one is offended by > > someone's postings not being up to their standards of niceness. It seems to > > me that if you can't handle having y

Re: Forming an opinion

> As Kurt Schrader smartly said: > "The last thing > we need is the idea police here to make sure that no one is offended by > someone's postings not being up to their standards of niceness. It seems to > me that if you can't handle having your ideas being called shit then you > should keep them

Re: Forming an opinion

Jon Stevens wrote: > on 1/22/01 1:55 PM, "Anil Vijendran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > That said, I don't understand why you bring this up _now_. > > I didn't bring it up earlier cause you weren't carrying on this discussion > about trying to censor me...nor was it something that "I can/shoul

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.1/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/connector ResponseStream.java

remm01/01/22 15:01:22 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/connector ResponseStream.java Log: - Addresses bug #819. The superclass was called with 0 as a parameter instead of off. Revision ChangesPath 1.3 +5 -5 jakar

RE: tomcat+visualage

Anybody knows a working combination of Win2K + Apache + Jserv + tomcat? I installed apache 1.3.12 + tomcat 3.2.1 + jserv (come with tomcat 3.2.1) on win2K but as soon as the jserv was added into the httpd.conf and the the dll was copied into the right place, the apache refused to start up. >From

Re: Forming an opinion

on 1/22/01 1:55 PM, "Anil Vijendran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That said, I don't understand why you bring this up _now_. I didn't bring it up earlier cause you weren't carrying on this discussion about trying to censor me...nor was it something that "I can/should bring up at the PMC." Do you

A newbie speaks

To all on the Tomcat Developer mailing list, I recently joined this list to both gain knowledge about Tomcat which I have been working with of late and to also hopefully contribute some of my ideas for improvements to the Tomcat project. Since joining the list on Friday I have received pr

RE: Forming an opinion

Hey Jon, You attacked Anil's position, but you did not proof him wrong. What are you attacking? The ideas or the man? Your ideas often make sense. Often better than opposite ideas. IMO, what Anil, me and others dislike is that, instead of attacking the opposite ideas, you attack the people that

RE: Forming an opinion

> -Original Message- > From: Jon Stevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 19:39 > > on 1/22/01 2:55 AM, "Paulo Gaspar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Now, by fundamentally right I mean that the basic idea is > perfect and that > > the implementation is somewhat

Re: Forming an opinion

First of, let me apologize for not showing up. IMO, it was an unfortunate thing that happened and I had to drop my car off (in the morning) and then get it back as well on the same day (before they close at 5). Regarding most of the actual issues that got discussed, I was very happy with the kinds

BugRat Report #820 has been filed.

Bug report #820 has just been filed. You can view the report at the following URL: REPORT #820 Details. Project: Catalina Category: Bug Report SubCategory: New Bug Report Class: swbug State: received Priority: medium Severity: seriou

[PATCH] Bug #746 - Additional logging in jk_uri_worker_map.c, function map_uri_to_worker

--- /home/jamey/tmp/jk_uri_worker_map.c Mon Jan 22 13:13:03 2001 +++ jk/jk_uri_worker_map.c Mon Jan 22 13:33:10 2001 @@ -358,6 +358,7 @@ uri = clean_uri; } + jk_log(l, JK_LOG_DEBUG, "Attempting to map URI %s\n", uri); for(i = 0 ; i < uw_map->size

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/modules/config AutoSetup.java

larryi 01/01/22 13:37:31 Modified:src/share/org/apache/tomcat/modules/config AutoSetup.java Log: Fix classloader problem which occurs when a war file gets expanded for a context that is already listed in the server.xml. The classloader gets created by server.xml processing b

Solaris make file

Here's a solaris make file for the Apache1.3 tomcat plugin. It might be nice to include such a thing in future releases though users should have some idea of how to create their own. -Jamey OS=solaris #ARCH=sparc #APACHE_HOME=/apps/apache #JAVA_HOME=/usr/local/java/jdk1.2.1 APXS=${APACHE_HOME

BugRat Report #819 has been filed.

Bug report #819 has just been filed. You can view the report at the following URL: REPORT #819 Details. Project: Servlet API Category: Bug Report SubCategory: New Bug Report Class: swbug State: received Priority: medium Severity: non

Re: Call for volunteers

Hi Costin: I can help with the following 1. Bug Fixes 2. Bug Reports/verification 5. Testing your application with tomcat and partial "Code Review" Thanks -Ramesh.Mandava >Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm >list-help: >l

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat RELEASE-PLAN-3.3 STATUS.html

larryi 01/01/22 13:21:45 Modified:.RELEASE-PLAN-3.3 STATUS.html Log: Some updates the schedule and move open items to STATUS.html. Filled in my name as Release Manager. Added action items to the Release Preparation section of STATUS.html. I'll make another pass

Re: Forming an opinion

Hey Anil, I know your car was broken, but you could have gotten a ride to the PMC meeting from one or more of the *many* people that you work with who were there (James, Pier, Amy, Jim, Costin, Justyi, Craig) and voiced your opinions directly instead of attempting to bring them up here after the

Re: Forming an opinion

James Duncan Davidson wrote: > If you have a beef with Jon's behavior, then voicing it here, or to him > personally, is the appropriate thing to do. Or if you want the PMC's charter > expanded, that's something that can be discussed. Not that I'm revealing any big secret here but yes I do have a

RE: tomcat+visualage

Simi, As per Dion's posting we could do with some more information. However if you are using : Apache Tomcat Test Environment (Sheldon Wosnick) http://www7.software.ibm.com/vad.nsf/Data/Document2390?OpenDocument And you're also running Tomcat 3.2.1 there is a small problem you may come across.

BugRat Report #818 has been filed.

Bug report #818 has just been filed. You can view the report at the following URL: REPORT #818 Details. Project: Jasper Category: Bug Report SubCategory: New Bug Report Class: suggest State: received Priority: medium Severity: critic

Re: IM LOST, ERROR 500????

Sorry all, Don't know quite what's going on here, but there's some sort of mysterious problem with my mailbox on our delivery server. I've gone ahead and unsubscribed from the list so that I don't continue to cause problems. I didn't realize until I saw this message that my mailbox was causing any

Re: IM LOST, ERROR 500????

Someone please unsubscribe this joker before he manages to mailloop himself into oblivion :) -Thom * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote on Mon Jan 22, 2001 at 08:00:58 +: > Delivery failure: javax.mail.MessagingException: 452 Filesystem error - message not >accepted > Delivery fail

Re: IM LOST, ERROR 500????

Delivery failure: javax.mail.MessagingException: 452 Filesystem error - message not accepted Delivery failure: javax.mail.MessagingException: 452 Filesystem error - message not accepted Delivery failure: javax.mail.MessagingException: 452 Filesystem error - message not accepted Delivery f

Re: [PROPOSAL] Tomcat 4.0-beta API Change: Security Manager Facades

Looks like there are enough +1's and no -1's to implement the architecture change required for the SecurityManager. I was hoping someone more familiar with the Tomcat 4 architecture would step up to do this. But since one else has, I'll take a stab at it since I am implementing the SecurityManag

Re: Forming an opinion

on 1/22/01 2:55 AM, "Paulo Gaspar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Now, by fundamentally right I mean that the basic idea is perfect and that > the implementation is somewhat shity. In the case of dial ins, I think that > he should not reprehend specific people (as he did with me and others) for > n

RE: Meeting dialins

> -Original Message- > From: James Duncan Davidson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 06:50 > > On 1/21/01 11:28 AM, "Shawn McMurdo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > A reservation system or even an informal "who's planning on dialing in" > > query on the list befor

Re: TC4's classloader choking on xerces.jar (maybe)

Gokul Singh wrote: > - Original Message - > From: "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Tomcat 4 follows the new rules in the servlet 2.3 PFD spec, which allows a > > container to change this so that loading starts with your WEB-INF areas > first. > > > > Consider the following

Need Help

Hi,    I need help from you. 1. I am loading a jsp thro tomcat. It is working fine. I am interested to know the flag setting for java compiler( it is used while compiling the .java file produced from JSP). Can any one help me in this regard? 2. Does anyone know what "jikes" are

ServletInputStream.available()

Hi every body,      As you know, ServletInputStream.available() always returns 0. I don't know if this issue has been fixed or not, so I propose a fix for that Simple and really quick to code, since we just have to reach the underlying BufferedInputStream :     On org.apache.tomcat.core.Buf

Re: tomcat+visualage

> I found following problems while connecting tomcat with visualage. I got > exception as invocation target exception while running the startTtomcat class > but the stoptomcat class is working properly.My assumption is that there may > be some error in Tomcat.java class.so please send me the >

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/tests build.xml

costin 01/01/22 08:42:16 Modified:.build.xml src/admin/WEB-INF/classes/tadm AntServletLogger.java GTestTag.java src/share/org/apache/tomcat/util/test DefaultMatcher.java GTest.java src/

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/admin/WEB-INF/scripts - New directory

costin 01/01/22 08:30:03 jakarta-tomcat/src/admin/WEB-INF/scripts - New directory - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Forming an opinion

> If you have a beef with Jon's behavior, then voicing it here, or to him > personally, is the appropriate thing to do. That is just what we did. IMHO, no one was asking for "official action". We made remarks about that issue of other veterans reprehending me and not Jon or both. But even this

RE: Forming an opinion

> -Original Message- > From: James Duncan Davidson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 06:50 > > On 1/20/01 2:45 PM, "Paulo Gaspar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ... > > Maybe I was putting forth my opinion as well. Happens now and then. :) We all are and that was

Help needed

Hi,    I need help from you guys. 1. I am loading a jsp thro tomcat. It is working fine. I am interested to know the flag setting for java compiler( it is used while compiling the .java file produced from JSP). Can any one help me in this regard? 2. Does anyone know what "jikes" are

BugRat Report #817 has been filed.

Bug report #817 has just been filed. You can view the report at the following URL: REPORT #817 Details. Project: Jasper Category: Bug Report SubCategory: New Bug Report Class: swbug State: received Priority: high Severity: critical C

Re: Interceptors

I haven't posted here before, but I do follow the list closely, as well as the code and the development efforts and have posted in the past on other apache boards. I'm hoping to get involved more directly with development issues (and bugs) as we prepare to move our application to TC3.x(where x>2)