> If you have a beef with Jon's behavior, then voicing it here, or to him
> personally, is the appropriate thing to do.
That is just what we did. IMHO, no one was asking for "official action".
We made remarks about that issue of other veterans reprehending me and
not Jon or both. But even this level of reprehension does not look that
"official" to me either.
Have fun,
Paulo
> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Duncan Davidson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 06:50
>
> On 1/20/01 11:56 PM, "Anil Vijendran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Agreed, James. I don't really see anyone question Jon's
> contributions to ASF
> > or to open source, in general. Jon is prolific and that's
> great. But many
> > posts from Jon "cross the line" and are harrassment. A small
> bit of toning
> > down would go > a long way.
>
> I should have been more clear -- legally defined harassment.
> Threats to body
> or property come to mind. Stalking. Not being a lawyer I don't know what
> else the ASF could be considered to be liable for (and of course
> it depends
> on what a jury thinks), however in my opinion it has to be this
> serious for
> official action to be taken. After all, it seemed clear to me
> that the PMC's
> role was too narrowly defined to include "niceness overseers".
>
> If you have a beef with Jon's behavior, then voicing it here, or to him
> personally, is the appropriate thing to do. Or if you want the
> PMC's charter
> expanded, that's something that can be discussed.
>
> --
> James Duncan Davidson
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> !try; do()
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
