Hey Jon,
You attacked Anil's position, but you did not proof him wrong.
What are you attacking? The ideas or the man?
Your ideas often make sense. Often better than opposite ideas.
IMO, what Anil, me and others dislike is that, instead of attacking
the opposite ideas, you attack the people that defend them, one by
one if necessary.
That is why me and others understand faster other people that are
defending just the same you do.
What about starting to attack the opposite ideas instead of the men
behind them? For sure it would be more efficient.
Have fun,
Paulo Gaspar
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jon Stevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 22:08
>
> Hey Anil,
>
> I know your car was broken, but you could have gotten a ride to the PMC
> meeting from one or more of the *many* people that you work with who were
> there (James, Pier, Amy, Jim, Costin, Justyi, Craig) and voiced your
> opinions directly instead of attempting to bring them up here after the
> fact.
>
> As a member of the PMC, you should have been there. Everyone else
> was and I
> don't think that attending the meeting was an optional thing. In fact, you
> attempted to dial in and then sent me email after having dropped
> off stating
> that you couldn't hear what people were saying...why didn't you just say
> something? We could have moved the mike closer to people as necessary. We
> didn't know.
>
> I'm tired of people who can't even bother to participate at the most
> important meeting attempting to censor or control me. That is bullshit.
>
> thanks,
>
> -jon
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
