Re: JMX to build TC 4.0 m5

- Original Message - From: "Jon Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, December 29, 2000 4:11 PM Subject: Re: JMX to build TC 4.0 m5 > on 12/28/2000 5:52 PM, "Pilho Kim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, developers! > > > > I need JMX implementation to bui

Re: TC 4.0 vs. TC 3.x and division of labor

Quoting James Duncan Davidson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Sideline this *now*. This will get discussed at the PMC meeting. Can non-PMC members like myself attend this ? Remy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additiona

Re: Licensing / Source Question

Hi Dan, > In the course of some work I've been doing on Tomcat, I've been > thinking about using a Thread Pool. There is currently a bunch of code > doing this in both TC 3 and TC 4, but, no surprise, it's extremely > difficult to understand and/or extend. Well, it is a big surprise - I thought

Re: Licensing / Source Question

on 12/28/2000 9:27 PM, "James Duncan Davidson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > However, if you do > what Jon suggests and check in a .jar file with the compiled classes, things > should be ok. I just can't wait to hear Craig and Sam yell at us for doing so though. :-) -jon -- Honk if you love pe

Re: Licensing / Source Question

On 12/28/00 9:08 PM, "Jon Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > He says you can do whatever you want with his code. How is that not clear? There is one problem potentially with a derived class. However, if you do what Jon suggests and check in a .jar file with the compiled classes, things should

Re: JMX to build TC 4.0 m5

on 12/28/2000 5:52 PM, "Pilho Kim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, developers! > > I need JMX implementation to build TC 4.0 > But I cannot download it from Sun in our country. > Please send me it. > > Thanks, > Kim Wouldn't that also mean that you shouldn't be downloading Tomcat as well? Wh

Re: Licensing / Source Question

on 12/28/2000 4:24 PM, "Dan Milstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm interested in using his code, but I'm not sure if it can be included in > the TC source. Here's what he says about the license: > > "All classes are released to the public domain and may be used for any purpose > whatsoever

Re: Feature Request

on 12/28/2000 5:28 PM, "Glenn Nielsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Apache mod_rewrite is very cool, it comes in handy at times. > Your feature request didn't contain much justifiying why it was needed. > I'm sure you have your reasons, go for it. I thought its "cool"ness clearly justifies it.

RE: Session Serialize code

I'll check in the fix tommorow - the HttpSessionBindingEvent and session reloading should go into the facade22 module. I was thinking about this - does it make sense to keep the session code in the core ? It seems to me that maintaining an object store is orthogonal to the http functionality - al

Re: Url Encoding/Decoding and static resources

Here is the patch for Tomcat 3.2.x, turned out to be fairly straightforward, but again there may be a better place to put this fix and there may be security issues I hadn't considered...Thanks again! David Weinrich --- FileUtil.java Thu Dec 28 19:19:43 2000 +++ FileUtilEd.java Thu Dec

JMX to build TC 4.0 m5

Hi, developers! I need JMX implementation to build TC 4.0 But I cannot download it from Sun in our country. Please send me it. Thanks, Kim

RE: Session Serialize code

Hi, I can't see ServerSession.writeObject (and readObject) there. You must have code which is ServerSession aware, since SeverSession member ssm (point to its manager) is not serializeable. Here is jon's original code (3.2.1): This must be fixed to be 3.3 compatible. I can do that (it's really e

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/startup EmbededTomcat.java

costin 00/12/28 17:34:42 Modified:src/etc server.xml src/share/org/apache/tomcat/context DefaultCMSetter.java src/share/org/apache/tomcat/modules/config ServerXmlInterceptor.java WorkDirSetup.java src/share/org/apach

Re: Feature Request

Jon Stevens wrote: > > on 12/28/2000 2:25 PM, "Glenn Nielsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > This would be way down on my list of priorities for a Jakarta project. > > It doesn't have to be a Jakarta Project. I never suggested that. > > > If I needed mod_rewrite for testing I would install A

Re: Session Serialize code

Hi Shai, Mea culpa :-) I moved Jon's code to org.apache.tomcat.util.ObjectSerializer ( I removed all dependencies to Session or tomcat internals - it should work for any serializable object ). ( my intentions were to make it more reusable and to reuse it in reloading context attributes, etc -

Session Serialize code

Hi Costin, As discussed a week ago, someone took out Jon's code to serialize session from 3.3. That code was part of 3.2 but does not exist in 3.3. Could you please add it back into ServerSession?? As proposed by you I'm working on "SerializableSession" module, and I need that piece of code to s

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/startup SimpleTomcat.java

costin 00/12/28 16:38:01 Removed: src/share/org/apache/tomcat/startup SimpleTomcat.java Log: Removed SimpleTomcat ( used to be part of EmbededTomcat ). It belongs in an example directory, not in the standard distribution.

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/etc web.dtd web.xml

costin 00/12/28 16:35:47 Removed: src/etc web.dtd web.xml Log: Removed web.xml, web.dtd - the files are not used. ( web.dtd is duplicated in tomcat.resources - that version is used to validate webapps ) Regarding web.xml - it has been a whole thread about that, and it hasn'

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/tests/webpages/WEB-INF test-tomcat.xml

costin 00/12/28 16:33:15 Modified:src/etc server.xml src/share/org/apache/tomcat/request SimpleRealm.java Added: src/etc/users admin-users.xml example-users.xml global-users.xml tomcat-users.xml src/tests/webpages/WEB-INF t

Licensing / Source Question

In the course of some work I've been doing on Tomcat, I've been thinking about using a Thread Pool. There is currently a bunch of code doing this in both TC 3 and TC 4, but, no surprise, it's extremely difficult to understand and/or extend. Doug Lea, author of Concurrent Programming in Java, h

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/etc/users - New directory

costin 00/12/28 16:24:40 jakarta-tomcat/src/etc/users - New directory

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/tests build.xml

costin 00/12/28 16:20:29 Modified:.build.xml src/share/org/apache/tomcat/context AutoSetup.java src/share/org/apache/tomcat/modules/config WebAppsConfig.java src/share/org/apache/tomcat/startup Main.java Tomca

Re: Feature Request

Is this not already an action item for catalina?? (RewriteValve) Dave --- Jon Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > on 12/28/2000 2:25 PM, "Glenn Nielsen" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > This would be way down on my list of priorities > for a Jakarta project. > > It doesn't have to be a Jak

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/request JDBCRealm.java LocalStrings.properties

nacho 00/12/28 15:59:31 Modified:src/share/org/apache/tomcat/request Tag: tomcat_32 JDBCRealm.java LocalStrings.properties Log: Now is needed to have both a connectionName and a connectionPassword to use the 3 params getConnection method Thanks to

netscape timing out

Title: netscape timing out I am using tomcat 3.2.1 release build on winnt4.0 when I use jsp:forward, IE works fine.Netscape gets timed out. <% str1 = "myPage.jsp"; str1 = response.encodeURL(str1); %> Any idea? Thanks, Jayesh

Re: TC 4.0 vs. TC 3.x and division of labor

On 12/28/00 4:47 AM, "Paulo Gaspar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Almost everybody is aware of Costin time limitations and respects the fact > that his work on Tomcat is purely voluntary (he is not paid to do it). > > Everybody respects Craig effort - including Costin (it sure looks so from > his

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/tests/share/gtest - New directory

costin 00/12/28 15:20:45 jakarta-tomcat/src/tests/share/gtest - New directory

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/util IntrospectionUtils.java

costin 00/12/28 15:19:57 Modified:.build.xml src/share/org/apache/tomcat/context AutoSetup.java src/share/org/apache/tomcat/startup Main.java Tomcat.java src/share/org/apache/tomcat/task Expand.java src/share/org/apach

Re: Tomcat 4 Jasper

Glenn Nielsen wrote: > The version of Jasper in Tomcat 4 inherits alot of baggage from > the original Jasper from 3.x. Jasper in 3.x had to support > both jdk 1.1.x and required jdk 1.2 to use the SecurityManager. > > Since Jasper in Tomcat 4 implements JSP 1.2, the version of jasper > in Tomcat

Re: Feature Request

on 12/28/2000 2:25 PM, "Glenn Nielsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This would be way down on my list of priorities for a Jakarta project. It doesn't have to be a Jakarta Project. I never suggested that. > If I needed mod_rewrite for testing I would install Apache on my local > development syst

ExceptionInInitializerError on loading Servlet

Has anyone seen this one before? I have a servlet that's being loaded from a jar in the classpath. All the other jars needed for the servlet to run (jdbc etc) are also in the classpath. Note, this is not a webapp - the classes are in the system classpath. Tomcat loads fine, and displays the proper

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/util/hooks Hooks.java

Quoting Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Jon Stevens wrote: > > > > Why does this scare me into thinking that if people > > start to base their code on top of this that they > > will be tying themselves to a single servlet engine? > > Isn't that something that we were trying to avoid? > > > > Corr

Re: Feature Request

This would be way down on my list of priorities for a Jakarta project. If I needed mod_rewrite for testing I would install Apache on my local development system. Why "reinvent the wheel" just for testing. Besides, I would still want to test the stuff developed locally on Apache with mod_rewr

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/util SessionUtil.java

glenn 00/12/28 14:15:30 Modified:src/share/org/apache/tomcat/util Tag: tomcat_32 SessionUtil.java Log: Fix generateSessionId() so it works with a SecurityManager Revision ChangesPath No revision No rev

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/facade RequestDispatcherImpl.java

glenn 00/12/28 14:13:51 Modified:src/share/org/apache/tomcat/facade Tag: tomcat_32 RequestDispatcherImpl.java Log: If SecurityManager being used, wrap forward() and include() with an AccessController.doPrivileged() Revision ChangesPath No

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/context PolicyInterceptor.java

glenn 00/12/28 14:12:11 Modified:src/share/org/apache/tomcat/context Tag: tomcat_32 PolicyInterceptor.java Log: Updated for default permissions, fix windows default FilePermission Revision ChangesPath No revision No

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/etc tomcat.policy

glenn 00/12/28 14:11:01 Modified:src/etc Tag: tomcat_32 tomcat.policy Log: Updated for default permissions Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.5.2.1 +7 -6 jakarta-tomcat/src/etc/tomcat.policy I

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/doc/uguide tomcat-security.html

glenn 00/12/28 13:59:35 Modified:src/doc/uguide Tag: tomcat_32 tomcat-security.html Log: SecurityManager under unix Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.1.2.2 +2 -168jakarta-tomcat/src/doc/uguide/Attic

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/doc/uguide tomcat-security-unix.html

glenn 00/12/28 13:59:19 Added: src/doc/uguide Tag: tomcat_32 tomcat-security-unix.html Log: SecurityManager under unix Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.1.2.1 +197 -0jakarta-tomcat/src/doc/uguide/

Feature Request

Ok, I'm just throwing this out there as a "nice to have" in the future and maybe someone (how about all those people who haven't commit anything, yet they have time to tell me what an asshole I am) might want to implement it. What would be "nice to have" is a feature where the Tomcat HTTPd had th

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/startup EmbededTomcat.java Tomcat.java

costin 00/12/28 13:08:07 Modified:src/share/org/apache/tomcat/startup EmbededTomcat.java Tomcat.java Added: src/share/org/apache/tomcat/modules/config ServerXmlInterceptor.java Log: Transformed the server.xml reader into a nor

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/core BaseInterceptor.java ContextManager.java

costin 00/12/28 13:03:18 Modified:src/share/org/apache/tomcat/core BaseInterceptor.java ContextManager.java Log: Added a new hook - engineState, to notify modules of state changes in core. ( it is important since modules can do different things in differen

Re: Tomcat 4 Jasper

Glenn Nielsen wrote: > > The version of Jasper in Tomcat 4 inherits alot of baggage from > the original Jasper from 3.x. Jasper in 3.x had to support > both jdk 1.1.x and required jdk 1.2 to use the SecurityManager. > > Since Jasper in Tomcat 4 implements JSP 1.2, the version of jasper > in Tom

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/util/hooksHooks.java

> > Jon Stevens wrote: > >> > >> Why does this scare me into thinking that if people > >> start to base their code on top of this that they > >> will be tying themselves to a single servlet engine? > >> Isn't that something that we were trying to avoid? > >> > >> Correct me if I'm wrong. > > >

Re: Tomcat 4 Jasper

on 12/28/2000 12:11 PM, "Glenn Nielsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So can I remove all the support for jdk 1.1.x from the version > of jasper in Tomcat 4? +1 -jon -- Honk if you love peace and quiet.

Tomcat 4 Jasper

The version of Jasper in Tomcat 4 inherits alot of baggage from the original Jasper from 3.x. Jasper in 3.x had to support both jdk 1.1.x and required jdk 1.2 to use the SecurityManager. Since Jasper in Tomcat 4 implements JSP 1.2, the version of jasper in Tomcat 4 is required to use jdk 1.2 or

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/modules/config ApacheConfig.java IISConfig.java NSConfig.java

costin 00/12/28 11:50:42 Modified:src/share/org/apache/tomcat/task StartTomcat.java Added: src/share/org/apache/tomcat/modules/config ApacheConfig.java IISConfig.java NSConfig.java Removed: src/share/org/apache/tomcat/task ApacheConfig.java

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/util RecycleBufferedInputStream.java

jon 00/12/28 11:44:40 Modified:src/share/org/apache/tomcat/util Tag: tomcat_32 RecycleBufferedInputStream.java Log: > I found problem that tomcat 3.2-b8 doesn't work on Kaffe VM. > (probably 3.2 final is same) > Error occurs at read() method in java.i

Re: cvs commit:jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/util/hooks Hooks.java

on 12/28/2000 10:42 AM, "Sam Ruby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jon Stevens wrote: >> >> Why does this scare me into thinking that if people >> start to base their code on top of this that they >> will be tying themselves to a single servlet engine? >> Isn't that something that we were trying to

Unsubscribe tomcat-dev

Unsubscribe tomcat-dev

RE: TC 4.0 vs. TC 3.x and division of labor

>So, to clarify what I do all day. Lets see, I'm involved, as a >committer, >with the following OSS projects (that I could think of off the >top of my >head...there are definitely more): > >1. Tomcat 3.x >2. Tomcat 4.x >3. Turbine >4. ECS >5. JServ >6. Velocity >7. Anakia >8. Regexp >9.

Re: TC 4.0 vs. TC 3.x and division of labor

on 12/27/2000 5:23 PM, "Casper Gjerris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In the last 80 days you have done 6 commits but send 153 other mails. Even > though many of them where ok, many of them where negative and nonconstructive, > like "I keep looking at this code and realizing how bad it is. :-(" an

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/util/hooks Hooks.java

Jon Stevens wrote: > > Why does this scare me into thinking that if people > start to base their code on top of this that they > will be tying themselves to a single servlet engine? > Isn't that something that we were trying to avoid? > > Correct me if I'm wrong. I see it as a good guideline, but

Re: cvs commit:jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/util/hooks Hooks.java

on 12/27/2000 10:15 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Added: src/share/org/apache/tomcat/util/hooks Hooks.java > Log: > First attempt to refactor hooks. Moving them in a util package is not a > bad idea ( and it's inspired by the new organization in 2.0 - I was > initiall

BugRat Report #671 has been filed.

Bug report #671 has just been filed. You can view the report at the following URL: REPORT #671 Details. Project: Tomcat Category: Bug Report SubCategory: New Bug Report Class: swbug State: received Priority: medium Severity: non-crit

Re: FileStore

Craig R. McClanahan typed the following on 09:35 AM 12/27/2000 -0800 >> >* Create another level of nesting inside called . This is >> > probably better, because you can now configure the properties of the >> > Store implementation using attributes. I haven't had much luck getting this workin

Unsubscribe tomcat-dev

Unsubscribe tomcat-dev

BugRat Report #641 was closed (apparently by: Ignacio Ortega)

Report #641 was closed by Person #0 Synopsis: Tomcat + IIS5.0 (logged in as: Ignacio Ortega)

RE: TC 4.0 vs. TC 3.x and division of labor

> Why don't you concentrate on commiting stuff for 4.0 instead of > picking on Costin and 3.3. > In the last 80 days you have done 6 commits but send 153 other > mails. Even though many of them where ok, many of them where > negative and nonconstructive, like "I keep looking at this code > and

RE: TC 4.0 vs. TC 3.x and division of labor

> -Original Message- > From: Jon Stevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2000 22:32 > > > I wrote _a_lot__ of the code that went into 3.2, and I did more work > > than you can imagine, Jon. I did that even if I had a job that is not > > tomcat, but xml-xalan. >

RE: TC 4.0 vs. TC 3.x and division of labor

Almost everybody is aware of Costin time limitations and respects the fact that his work on Tomcat is purely voluntary (he is not paid to do it). Everybody respects Craig effort - including Costin (it sure looks so from his postings). In fact, Jon is the only person trying to turn this into a

RE: TC 4.0 vs. TC 3.x and division of labor

Costin, your "elegant" as all to do with "robust". Hard to understand and maintain code can hardly be robust. Have fun, Paulo Gaspar > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2000 20:12 > > I disagree with you about 2 po

Means to which end?

I believe Eric Raymond said it best when he said open source is about developers scratching a personal itch. Sometimes it's a big itch, and we need help to give it a proper scratching, and so we work together, and call it a project. To a lot of developers, the project is simply a means to an end,

Returning status 500 and data from servlet

Hi, I need to return HTTP 500 from servlet along with some usable data, but Tomcat (4.0 m4&5) adds its own data. Here is my code fragment: resp.setStatus (resp.SC_INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR); resp.setContentType ("text/xml"); Writer wrt=resp.getWriter (); wrt.write (message);

Re: [BUG & PATCH] for Kaffe VM

Hi, Tomcat developers. > > I found problem that tomcat 3.2-b8 doesn't work on Kaffe VM. > > (probably 3.2 final is same) > > Error occurs at read() method in java.io.BufferedInputStream. I had a contact to Edouard who is one of Kaffe VM developer. He said Tomcat should be fixed. I forward him

Re: Url Encoding/Decoding and static resources

---snip--- > ...but there might be security/implementation > issues that I missed. ---snip--- Oops! Found one big issue right after I sent off the patch. Patch now checks for non-hex-character-strings in the encoding, and returns null if present ( similar to what happens if a control character is

Tomcat 4 vs Tomcat 3 Discussions

I think that this has gone about as far as it can productively go in email. I'd like to ask *all* participants in this discussion to cool it until Tuesday January 16th when you can voice your opinions at the Jakarta PMC meeting. Normally, I would prefer to actually try to reach some sort of reso