> -----Original Message----- > From: Jon Stevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2000 22:32 > > > I wrote _a_lot__ of the code that went into 3.2, and I did more work > > than you can imagine, Jon. I did that even if I had a job that is not > > tomcat, but xml-xalan. > > In fact, you did some of that work during your day time job. :-) This is a rather stupid remark. Are you trying to attack Costin's relation with his employer? > > In any case - this is not about me, but about tomcat. I do my best to > > improve tomcat, if that's not enough for you - I'm sorry. > > Tomcat 3.x or 4.x? > Having a very stable Tomcat 3.3 would only do good to the Apache and Tomcat names. If (as many believe) it is possible to get a solid 3.3 before a solid 4.x, that would only pave the way for a wide 4.x acceptance. Have fun, Paulo Gaspar
- Re: TC 4.0 vs. TC 3.x and division of labor Sam Ruby
- Re: TC 4.0 vs. TC 3.x and division of labor Jon Stevens
- Re: TC 4.0 vs. TC 3.x and division of labor cmanolache
- Re: TC 4.0 vs. TC 3.x and division of labor Jon Stevens
- Re: TC 4.0 vs. TC 3.x and division of l... Nick Bauman
- Re: TC 4.0 vs. TC 3.x and division of l... cmanolache
- Re: TC 4.0 vs. TC 3.x and division of l... Paulo Gaspar
- Re: TC 4.0 vs. TC 3.x and division of labor Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: TC 4.0 vs. TC 3.x and division of labor Jon Stevens
- Re: TC 4.0 vs. TC 3.x and division of l... Casper Gjerris
- RE: TC 4.0 vs. TC 3.x and division ... Paulo Gaspar
- Re: TC 4.0 vs. TC 3.x and division ... Jon Stevens
- RE: TC 4.0 vs. TC 3.x and division of labor Paulo Gaspar
- Re: TC 4.0 vs. TC 3.x and division of labor James Duncan Davidson
- Re: TC 4.0 vs. TC 3.x and division of l... Remy Maucherat
- Re: TC 4.0 vs. TC 3.x and division ... Jon Stevens
- Re: TC 4.0 vs. TC 3.x and division ... James Duncan Davidson