On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 13:27 +0800, Shane Chrisp wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-03-14 at 14:54 -0700, Carl Parrish wrote:
>
> > I'm thinking it may be the old version of qmail. Problem is I don't know
> > what is mine and what is what they had in there.
> > # ps -ef | grep qmail
> > root 30276 26688
Thank you Shane,
When I did that I got back
netstat -ap | grep smtp
tcp0 0 *:smtps *:*
LISTEN 5248/xinetd
tcp0 0 *:smtp *:*
LISTEN 5248/xinetd
looking in /etc/xinitd.d/ I find two files. smtp_psa and smtps_psa I
*think* psa was
I just installed the toaster with options (SA, clamav,
simscan, etc) . It works great. Thanks Bill !!
Now, I try to minimize the traffic due to non-existent
users, virus file, etc. I tried to patch the netqmail
with qmail-limit-bounce-size.patch, I could patch
successfully. However, the bounce bac
Now, I try to minimize the traffic due to non-existent
users, virus file, etc. I tried to patch the netqmail
with qmail-limit-bounce-size.patch, I could patch
successfully. However, the bounce back messages are
Well. You need to provide information about patches, where from (url?)
--
Eero
On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 10:32 +0200, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> > looking in /etc/xinitd.d/ I find two files. smtp_psa and smtps_psa I
> > *think* psa was the web based tool they had set up to control qmail (and
> > other things) I'm going to end up with qmailadmin so don't care if psa
> > is complete
I *did* install the toaster way. But I think they had it set up to run
under both init.d and xinetd do I have to stop them both then
*reinstall*?
Well. You don't need to reinstall just stop xinetd using
/etc/init.d/xinetd stop and then just run qmailctl restart.
It should work fine after that.
-
Ernest Ho wrote:
I just installed the toaster with options (SA, clamav,
simscan, etc) . It works great. Thanks Bill !!
Now, I try to minimize the traffic due to non-existent
users, virus file, etc. I tried to patch the netqmail
with qmail-limit-bounce-size.patch, I could patch
successfully. However
On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 10:49 +0200, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> > *reinstall*?
>
> Well. You don't need to reinstall just stop xinetd using
> /etc/init.d/xinetd stop and then just run qmailctl restart.
>
> It should work fine after that.
>
> --
> Eero
Not same error in log. (and I'm concerned that *
Not same error in log. (and I'm concerned that *something* in xinetd may
have been important) typing "ps -ef | grep xinetd" gives me.
root 5248 1 0 Feb22 ?00:00:01 xinetd -stayalive -
pidfile /var/run/xinetd.pid
is it safe to kill that ps?
try first to kill -TERM and then with -
any good tutorials about publishing SPF records?
--
Eero
On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 01:57 -0700, Carl Parrish wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 10:49 +0200, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> >
> > It should work fine after that.
> >
> > --
> Not same error in log. (and I'm concerned that *something* in xinetd may
> have been important) typing "ps -ef | grep xinetd" giv
Hello,
Take a look at that:
http://spf.pobox.com/wizard.html
> any good tutorials about publishing SPF records?
> --
> Eero
Kind regards,
Vladimir.
ftp://ftp.pipeline.com.au/pipeint/sources/linux/WebMail/qmail-limit-bounce-size.patch.txt
For netqmail, we have to change the qmail-1.03 to
netqmail-1.05.
--- Eero Volotinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Now, I try to minimize the traffic due to
> non-existent
> > users, virus file, etc. I
Yes Eero, it is simple. I succeeded when I follow the
installation steps in
http://www.pipeline.com.au/staff/mbowe/isp/webmail-server.htm
When I follow the toaster, the bounce message is still
the same size as before.
But I am thinking that the bounce messages are now in
SMTP level instead of go
Ernest Ho wrote:
Yes Eero, it is simple. I succeeded when I follow the
installation steps in
http://www.pipeline.com.au/staff/mbowe/isp/webmail-server.htm
When I follow the toaster, the bounce message is still
the same size as before.
But I am thinking that the bounce messages are now in
SMTP lev
Ernest Ho wrote:
Yes Eero, it is simple. I succeeded when I follow the
installation steps in
http://www.pipeline.com.au/staff/mbowe/isp/webmail-server.htm
When I follow the toaster, the bounce message is still
the same size as before.
But I am thinking that the bounce messages are now in
SMTP lev
The last qmail server I built (NOT from Toaster), the
email will be bounced back to the sender if there is
no such email account. And the bounce message size
will be truncated to the specified size (you can
specify the size, e.g. 10K).
Now, I follow toaster and add the
qmail-limit-bounce-size pat
Ernest Ho wrote:
The last qmail server I built (NOT from Toaster), the
email will be bounced back to the sender if there is
no such email account. And the bounce message size
will be truncated to the specified size (you can
specify the size, e.g. 10K).
With toaster there is chkusr patch on toaster
but does not eliminate the complete id... ugh, the user who keeps trying
to send several megabytes in already full mailbox.
Eero Volotinen wrote:
Ernest Ho wrote:
The last qmail server I built (NOT from Toaster), the
email will be bounced back to the sender if there is
no such email account. And
Boris Pavlov wrote:
but does not eliminate the complete id... ugh, the user who keeps trying
to send several megabytes in already full mailbox.
There is also quota support in toaster? Can't remember.
Situation:
user1 sends mail via server -> remote address and bounche comes from
remonte server? I
Hello,
Is the qmail-queue-custom-error.patch included into the toaster? I
think it would be useful to let senders know why their message was
rejected.
Kind regards,
Vladimir.
Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
Hello,
Is the qmail-queue-custom-error.patch included into the toaster? I
think it would be useful to let senders know why their message was
rejected.
No? Basic error messages should be enought?
--
Eero
Don't think so. Imagine regular user who would like to send a message
to you, and got the
551 Message rejected by server
or whatsoever...
With this patch he (she) will get:
551 Your message is detected as spam
or
551 Your message contains Bagle-MM virus
or
551 Your message contains prohibit
I have made two tests.
I have two qmail servers:
Server A with qmail NOT following Toaster, but with
qmail-limit-bounce-size.patch.
Server B with qmail following Toaster.
I send an email with virus (103K) to these two email
servers thru yahoo email. Certainly, I got 2 return
emails because I have
Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
Don't think so. Imagine regular user who would like to send a message
to you, and got the
551 Message rejected by server
or whatsoever...
With this patch he (she) will get:
551 Your message is detected as spam
or
551 Your message contains Bagle-MM virus
or
551 Your message co
Dear Vladimir
Yes, it is an option in Toaster. You can download the
patch at: http://www.shupp.org/patches/custom.patch to
patch the qmail. And, you have to add the configure
option of "--custom-smtp-reject" when you configure
simscan.
I did it and it works.
Ernest
--- Vladimir Kozlov <[EMAIL P
Another email returns from [EMAIL PROTECTED],
the size is 104K.
Well, that is normal behavior, you can complain it about yahoo.
Their mail server returns mails fully because remonte server does not
accept it.
Without chkusr qmail receives mail. scans and truncates it.
Toaster chusr+simcan rejects
Dear Ernest,
Thank you - it works just fine.
Kind regards,
Vladimir.
> Dear Vladimir
> Yes, it is an option in Toaster. You can download the
> patch at: http://www.shupp.org/patches/custom.patch to
> patch the qmail. And, you have to add the configure
> option of "--custom-smtp-reject" when yo
- Original Message -
From: "Ernest Ho" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 10:16 PM
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [toaster] qmail-queue-custom-error.patch
> Dear Vladimir
>
> Yes, it is an option in Toaster. You can download the
> patch at: http://www.shupp.org/patches/custom.p
I have installed toaster with the options (SA, CLAMAV,
simscan,etc). I configure the simscan as:
./configure --enable-user=clamav \
--enable-clamav=y \
--enable-spam=y \
--enable-spam-passthru=y \
--enable-per-domain=y \
--enable-ripmime \
--enable-attach=y \
--enable-received=y
And set the config
Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
Hello,
Is the qmail-queue-custom-error.patch included into the toaster? I
think it would be useful to let senders know why their message was
rejected.
No, but I did format it to work with the toaster patch:
http://shupp.org/patches/custom.patch
I have not tested it in a while
--- Bill Shupp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Is the qmail-queue-custom-error.patch included
> into the toaster? I
> > think it would be useful to let senders know why
> their message was
> > rejected.
>
> No, but I did format it to work with the toaster
>
On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 11:02 +0200, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> > Not same error in log. (and I'm concerned that *something* in xinetd may
> > have been important) typing "ps -ef | grep xinetd" gives me.
> > root 5248 1 0 Feb22 ?00:00:01 xinetd -stayalive -
> > pidfile /var/run/xinetd
Carl Parrish wrote:
On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 11:02 +0200, Eero Volotinen wrote:
Not same error in log. (and I'm concerned that *something* in xinetd may
have been important) typing "ps -ef | grep xinetd" gives me.
root 5248 1 0 Feb22 ?00:00:01 xinetd -stayalive -
pidfile /var/run/xi
On Tuesday 15 Mar 2005 16:49, Carl Parrish wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 11:02 +0200, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> > > Not same error in log. (and I'm concerned that *something* in xinetd
> > > may have been important) typing "ps -ef | grep xinetd" gives me.
> > > root 5248 1 0 Feb22 ?
Due to some abuses from my users I need to disable SMTP (they will have to
use ISP server instead). In other words, I want to only allow my SMTP server
to accept messages to my *local* domains instead of relaying even for
authenticated users.
So, how can I do this please ?
Thank's in advance
Júlio Olivares wrote:
Due to some abuses from my users I need to disable SMTP (they will have to
use ISP server instead). In other words, I want to only allow my SMTP server
to accept messages to my *local* domains instead of relaying even for
authenticated users.
So, how can I do this please ?
Tha
I have installed the qmail with Toaster. Everything
works fine. However, I do not know why the pop3ds
cannot work. Following is my setting:
cat /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-pop3ds/run
#!/bin/sh
VPOPMAILUID=`id -u vpopmail`
VPOPMAILGID=`id -g vpopmail`
exec /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -l 0 -R -H -v
Ernest Ho wrote:
I have installed the qmail with Toaster. Everything
works fine. However, I do not know why the pop3ds
cannot work. Following is my setting:
cat /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-pop3ds/run
#!/bin/sh
VPOPMAILUID=`id -u vpopmail`
VPOPMAILGID=`id -g vpopmail`
exec /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -l
On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 08:50 -0800, Bill Shupp wrote:
> >
> > So I'm guessing that's all good. However when I run inst_check I'm still
> > getting
> > ! /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb is missing
> > ...try: /var/qmail/bin/qmailctl cdb
> >
> > qmailctl cdb doesn't seem to help. Any thoughts?
>
> What is inst
On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 17:23 +, Bob Hutchinson wrote:
Thanks for you help Bob.
>
> your tcp.smtp should be in /home/vpopmail/etc/
its there.
>
> check your run file in
> /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-smtpd/
Maybe just instal_check was pointing there. I didn't realize that it
would be different.
On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 21:58 -0700, Carl Parrish wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 08:50 -0800, Bill Shupp wrote:
>
> > >
> > > So I'm guessing that's all good. However when I run inst_check I'm still
> > > getting
> > > ! /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb is missing
> > > ...try: /var/qmail/bin/qmailctl cdb
> > >
42 matches
Mail list logo
