Re: [toaster] toaster 0.7b patch

All, I have had a look at the SpamThrottle patch (http://spamthrottle.qmail.ca) and it looks like the SpamThrottle mechanism does not take into account SMTP AUTH, can you confirm whether this is the case or not. On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, Bill Shupp wrote: > All, > > I have posted a new netqmail pat

Re: [toaster] toaster 0.7b patch

Bill Shupp wrote: All, I have posted a new netqmail patch for toaster 0.7, and it's a beta version. I'd like some help testing if anyone has time. Here's the feature list: netqmail-1.05 based Additional patches: oversize dns smtp-auth/tls latest versions mfcheck latest version SpamTh

Re: [toaster] toaster 0.7b patch

Drew Wells wrote: All, I have had a look at the SpamThrottle patch (http://spamthrottle.qmail.ca) and it looks like the SpamThrottle mechanism does not take into account SMTP AUTH, can you confirm whether this is the case or not. If smtp auth is successful, RELAYCLIENT is set, so throttling is

Re: [toaster] toaster 0.7b patch

Ahmet YAZICI wrote: Hello Bill, please can you explain me or us what is the deal with checking addrallowed() twice ? First one is just before realrcpt_check() and second on is located in realrcpt_check() function. I hadn't thought about that. It seems that the second one, in realrcpt_check, w

[toaster] toaster 0.7b2 patch

There was a bug in the composite patch, breaking TLS. I fixed it, and have released 0.7b2. Here are the download links: http://shupp.org/patches/qmail-toaster-0.7b2.patch http://shupp.org/patches/chkuser-0.7b2.patch or if you use MySQL: http://shupp.org/patches/chkuser-0.7b2.mysql.patch Also, th

Re: [toaster] toaster 0.7b patch

Hi Bill: Can we get to vote on whether SPF should be added to the toaster? We already have SPF in Spamassassin which included in QmailScanner. To add it in the Toaster would be an unnecessary duplication. Plus, it seems more appropriate for SpamAssassin as a spam filter function. One further com

Re: [toaster] toaster 0.7b patch

Jeff Koch wrote: Hi Bill: Can we get to vote on whether SPF should be added to the toaster? We already have SPF in Spamassassin which included in QmailScanner. To add it in the Toaster would be an unnecessary duplication. Plus, it seems more appropriate for SpamAssassin as a spam filter function

[toaster] Hotmail

I can receive mail from hotmail.com but when I send email to hotmail.com it accepts it but does not deliver it. Any suggestions? Ultradent Products, Inc. Email Policy The information in this email, including any at

Re: [toaster] toaster 0.7b patch

That would be nice for people THAT RUN SPAMASSASSIN, that means you would force it on other people that would rather use another program, plus SPF on the server side would drop the load on the system because of SA Being perl. -John - Original Message - From: "Jeff Koch" <[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: [toaster] toaster 0.7b patch

Jeff Koch wrote: Hi Bill: Can we get to vote on whether SPF should be added to the toaster? We already have SPF in Spamassassin which included in QmailScanner. To add it in the Toaster would be an unnecessary duplication. Plus, it seems more appropriate for SpamAssassin as a spam filter function

Re: [toaster] Hotmail

Paul Greenwood wrote: I can receive mail from hotmail.com but when I send email to hotmail.com it accepts it but does not deliver it. Any suggestions? No bouncebacks or anything? -- --- Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold Engine / Technology Programmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] RedHat Certif

Re: [toaster] Hotmail

No bouncebacks. I look in the log file and hotmail accepts the email for delivery but the email is never delivered to the hotmail account. >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/17/04 18:58 PM >>> Paul Greenwood wrote: >I can receive mail from hotmail.com but when I send >email to hotmail.com it accepts it b

Re: [toaster] Hotmail

Paul Greenwood kirjoitti: No bouncebacks. I look in the log file and hotmail accepts the email for delivery but the email is never delivered to the hotmail account. Check out junk folder? Sure that your server is not in blocklists? -- Eero