Jeff Koch wrote:
Hi Bill:
Can we get to vote on whether SPF should be added to the toaster? We already have SPF in Spamassassin which included in QmailScanner. To add it in the Toaster would be an unnecessary duplication. Plus, it seems more appropriate for SpamAssassin as a spam filter function. One further comment - SPF seems to really slow things down and I would hate to have Qmail all gummed with these network tests.
Actually, SPF can reduce network load if implemented directly in qmail. Since it checks the Mail From and Source IP, it can drop connections before any data is sent. This saves in network usage.
The only reason I can see it being in spamassassin is to bump up the Spam Level a bit if there is no SPF record, or the record has ?all in it...
Best Regards,
Jeff Koch
-- --------------------------- Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold Engine / Technology Programmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] RedHat Certified - RHCE # 803004140609871 MySQL Pro Certified - ID# 207171862 MySQL Core Certified - ID# 205982910 --------------------------- "Something mysterious is formed, born in the silent void. Waiting alone and unmoving, it is at once still and yet in constant motion. It is the source of all programs. I do not know its name, so I will call it the Tao of Programming."
