That would be nice for people THAT RUN SPAMASSASSIN, that means you would force it on other people that would rather use another program, plus SPF on the server side would drop the load on the system because of SA Being perl.
-John ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeff Koch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 3:59 PM Subject: Re: [toaster] toaster 0.7b patch > Hi Bill: > > Can we get to vote on whether SPF should be added to the toaster? We > already have SPF in Spamassassin which included in QmailScanner. To add it > in the Toaster would be an unnecessary duplication. Plus, it seems more > appropriate for SpamAssassin as a spam filter function. One further comment > - SPF seems to really slow things down and I would hate to have Qmail all > gummed with these network tests. > > > > > > Best Regards, > > Jeff Koch > > >
