[toaster] greylisting

2004-03-27 Thread Bill Shupp
In case anyone is curious, I've been investigating Greylisting, a fairly new anti-forgery method described here: http://projects.puremagic.com/greylisting/ I have put together a composite patch of the qmail-envelope-scanner program (wrapper for local_scan, both my Martin Dempsey), and a qmail-

Re: [toaster] greylisting

2004-03-27 Thread Gary
From: "Bill Shupp" > > In case anyone is curious, I've been investigating Greylisting, a fairly > new anti-forgery method described here: > > http://projects.puremagic.com/greylisting/ > > I have put together a composite patch of the qmail-envelope-scanner > program (wrapper for local_scan, both my

Re: [toaster] greylisting

2004-03-27 Thread Bill Shupp
Gary wrote: From: "Bill Shupp" In case anyone is curious, I've been investigating Greylisting, a fairly new anti-forgery method described here: http://projects.puremagic.com/greylisting/ I have put together a composite patch of the qmail-envelope-scanner program (wrapper for local_scan, both my M

Re: [toaster] greylisting

2004-03-27 Thread Gary
Hi, Also, is it possible to change dbdef.sql file to say: GRANT SELECT,INSERT,UPDATE,DELETE ON relaydelay.* TO 'milter'@'localhost' IDENTIFIED BY 'milter'; Because this line from the original dbdef.sql: grant select,insert,update,delete tables on relaydelay.* to milter@"localhost" identified by

[toaster] deleting alias domain

2004-03-27 Thread James Taylor
Hi everyone, just curious if there was a way to delete an alias domain?? Whenever I go to vqadmin to delete an alias domain, it ends up deleting the parent domain (which really ended up screwing me), and leaves both the parent domain AND the alias domain listed in vpopmail. To actually delete

Re: [toaster] deleting alias domain

2004-03-27 Thread Bill Shupp
James Taylor wrote: Hi everyone, just curious if there was a way to delete an alias domain?? Whenever I go to vqadmin to delete an alias domain, it ends up deleting the parent domain (which really ended up screwing me), and leaves both the parent domain AND the alias domain listed in vpopmail.

Re: [toaster] greylisting

2004-03-27 Thread Bill Shupp
Gary wrote: Hi, Also, is it possible to change dbdef.sql file to say: GRANT SELECT,INSERT,UPDATE,DELETE ON relaydelay.* TO 'milter'@'localhost' IDENTIFIED BY 'milter'; Because this line from the original dbdef.sql: grant select,insert,update,delete tables on relaydelay.* to milter@"localhost" i

Re: [toaster] deleting alias domain

2004-03-27 Thread James Taylor
Ah, I overlooked the -v command. It looks as though I'm running 5.3.6 according to vdeldomain -v, which would appear later than 4.9.2, but... still doesn't work right, and I have an alias sitting around now doing nothing but shoving 100 spam messages a day into my inbox (Haven't figured out DSP

Re: [toaster] deleting alias domain

2004-03-27 Thread Bill Shupp
James Taylor wrote: Ah, I overlooked the -v command. It looks as though I'm running 5.3.6 according to vdeldomain -v, which would appear later than 4.9.2, but... still doesn't work right, and I have an alias sitting around now doing nothing but shoving 100 spam messages a day into my inbox (Ha

Re: [toaster] greylisting

2004-03-27 Thread Gary
From: "Bill Shupp" > Gary wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Also, is it possible to change dbdef.sql file to say: > > > > GRANT SELECT,INSERT,UPDATE,DELETE ON relaydelay.* TO 'milter'@'localhost' > > IDENTIFIED BY 'milter'; > > > > Because this line from the original dbdef.sql: > > > > grant select,insert,u

Re: [toaster] deleting alias domain

2004-03-27 Thread Gary
From: "Bill Shupp" > James Taylor wrote: > > > Ah, I overlooked the -v command. > > > > It looks as though I'm running 5.3.6 according to vdeldomain -v, which > > would appear later than 4.9.2, but... still doesn't work right, and I > > have an alias sitting around now doing nothing but shoving 100

Re: [toaster] deleting alias domain

2004-03-27 Thread James Taylor
Yep, that worked :) I wonder what went wrong. Oh well, thanks for your help On Mar 27, 2004, at 9:30 PM, Bill Shupp wrote: James Taylor wrote: Ah, I overlooked the -v command. It looks as though I'm running 5.3.6 according to vdeldomain -v, which would appear later than 4.9.2, but... still d