Re: [toaster] qmail-smtpd-viruscan-1.3.patch

2004-02-13 Thread Tom Collins
On Feb 13, 2004, at 12:37 AM, Mike McCallister wrote: P.S. Does anyone have experience with http://bincimap.org/ (IMAP server with Maildir++ support) ? Looks relatively nifty. This mailing list post brought it to my attention: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg01013.html while

Re: [toaster] qmail-smtpd-viruscan-1.3.patch

2004-02-13 Thread Bill Shupp
Tom Collins wrote: On Feb 13, 2004, at 12:37 AM, Mike McCallister wrote: P.S. Does anyone have experience with http://bincimap.org/ (IMAP server with Maildir++ support) ? Looks relatively nifty. This mailing list post brought it to my attention: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

RE: [toaster] qmail-smtpd-viruscan-1.3.patch

2004-02-13 Thread Shane Chrisp
No it doesn't. I asked on the mailing list after having a play with it. he has added quota support for Maildir to the list, but has stated he will not add support for Maildir++ due to it not adhering to the Maildir specs or something similar. It should be on the mailing list archives along with

Re: [toaster] qmail-smtpd-viruscan-1.3.patch

2004-02-13 Thread Bill Shupp
Shane Chrisp wrote: No it doesn't. I asked on the mailing list after having a play with it. he has added quota support for Maildir to the list, but has stated he will not add support for Maildir++ due to it not adhering to the Maildir specs or something similar. It should be on the mailing list

Re: [toaster] qmail-smtpd-viruscan-1.3.patch

2004-02-13 Thread Christian Michel
It's good to see, that the spam & virus-problem become an important subject these days on the list. I've revisited shupp.org after the announcement of Bill Shupp for the netqmail-patch. Now i have a problem. I use the unpatched version of qmail-sources from debian. There some patches are applied

Re: [toaster] qmail-smtpd-viruscan-1.3.patch

2004-02-13 Thread Bill Shupp
Christian Michel wrote: It's good to see, that the spam & virus-problem become an important subject these days on the list. I've revisited shupp.org after the announcement of Bill Shupp for the netqmail-patch. Now i have a problem. I use the unpatched version of qmail-sources from debian. There so

[toaster] 0.6-1 patch

2004-02-13 Thread Bill Shupp
All, I have made some minor changes to my toaster patch, and updated the version to 0.6-1. The changes have to do with the ownership of the tls certificates. Instead of duplicating the servercert.pem as clientcert.pem, I went back to using a symbolic link, and chowned the files vpopmail:qmai