OK - thanks - I misunderstood - optional is fair enough.
At 07:13 PM 8/17/2004, you wrote:
Jeff Koch wrote:
Hi Bill:
Can we get to vote on whether SPF should be added to the toaster? We
already have SPF in Spamassassin which included in QmailScanner. To add
it in the Toaster would be an unnecessa
Jeff Koch wrote:
Hi Bill:
Can we get to vote on whether SPF should be added to the toaster? We
already have SPF in Spamassassin which included in QmailScanner. To
add it in the Toaster would be an unnecessary duplication. Plus, it
seems more appropriate for SpamAssassin as a spam filter function
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 3:59 PM
Subject: Re: [toaster] toaster 0.7b patch
> Hi Bill:
>
> Can we get to vote on whether SPF should be added to the toaster? We
> already have SPF in Spamassassin which included in QmailScanner. T
Jeff Koch wrote:
Hi Bill:
Can we get to vote on whether SPF should be added to the toaster? We
already have SPF in Spamassassin which included in QmailScanner. To
add it in the Toaster would be an unnecessary duplication. Plus, it
seems more appropriate for SpamAssassin as a spam filter function
Hi Bill:
Can we get to vote on whether SPF should be added to the toaster? We
already have SPF in Spamassassin which included in QmailScanner. To add it
in the Toaster would be an unnecessary duplication. Plus, it seems more
appropriate for SpamAssassin as a spam filter function. One further com
Ahmet YAZICI wrote:
Hello Bill,
please can you explain me or us what is the deal with checking
addrallowed() twice ? First one is just before
realrcpt_check() and second on is located in realrcpt_check() function.
I hadn't thought about that. It seems that the second one, in
realrcpt_check, w
Drew Wells wrote:
All,
I have had a look at the SpamThrottle patch (http://spamthrottle.qmail.ca)
and it looks like the SpamThrottle mechanism does not take into account
SMTP AUTH, can you confirm whether this is the case or not.
If smtp auth is successful, RELAYCLIENT is set, so throttling is
Bill Shupp wrote:
All,
I have posted a new netqmail patch for toaster 0.7, and it's a beta
version. I'd like some help testing if anyone has time.
Here's the feature list:
netqmail-1.05 based
Additional patches:
oversize dns
smtp-auth/tls latest versions
mfcheck latest version
SpamTh
All,
I have had a look at the SpamThrottle patch (http://spamthrottle.qmail.ca)
and it looks like the SpamThrottle mechanism does not take into account
SMTP AUTH, can you confirm whether this is the case or not.
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, Bill Shupp wrote:
> All,
>
> I have posted a new netqmail pat
