RE: [toaster] Spamassassin

: toaster@shupp.org Asunto: Re: [toaster] Spamassassin Gastón: what blacklist? how and where did you configured that. in local.cf ? If you provide some for detail of you configuration it should be easier to help. At the moment we know that: - spamassassin is running (good) - no logs are showing up

Re: [toaster] Spamassassin

port was in use, which use the command SPAMD WITH 768-d and switch port, but still no results, which can be?       De: Sergio Rosa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Enviado el: jueves, 06 de marzo de 2008 14:42 Para: toaster@shupp.org Asunto: Re: [toaster] Spamassassin

RE: [toaster] Spamassassin

port, but still no results, which can be? info firm3 De: Sergio Rosa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviado el: jueves, 06 de marzo de 2008 14:42 Para: toaster@shupp.org Asunto: Re: [toaster] Spamassassin Hi, when you run spamassassin --lint -D does it complains or runs clean. If it

RE: [toaster] Spamassassin

- De: John Harmon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviado el: jueves, 06 de marzo de 2008 14:38 Para: toaster@shupp.org Asunto: Re: [toaster] Spamassassin Try the following command to see what is listening on that port already: netstat -antup | grep :783 John Gastón Marión wrote: > In a current

Re: [toaster] Spamassassin

: could not create INET socket on port 127.0.0.1:783 already in use ... How can I solve the problem? -Mensaje original- De: John Harmon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviado el: jueves, 06 de marzo de 2008 14:01 Para: toaster@shupp.org Asunto: Re: [toaster] Spamassassin Not sure if you are

Re: [toaster] Spamassassin

Hi, when you run spamassassin --lint -D does it complains or runs clean. If it complains you should check whats wrong, if no complains you're probably good to go. Regards, Sergio Rosa Gastón Marión wrote: Hello everybody: I still problems in the configuration spamassassin, i

Re: [toaster] Spamassassin

? -Mensaje original- De: John Harmon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviado el: jueves, 06 de marzo de 2008 14:01 Para: toaster@shupp.org Asunto: Re: [toaster] Spamassassin Not sure if you are saying you checked if it works or not and it isn't, or if you are asking for a way to check it.

RE: [toaster] Spamassassin

@shupp.org Asunto: Re: [toaster] Spamassassin Not sure if you are saying you checked if it works or not and it isn't, or if you are asking for a way to check it. To check it you can review your /var/log/spamd/current file and see if spam checkups are being logged there. John Gastón Marión

Re: [toaster] Spamassassin

Not sure if you are saying you checked if it works or not and it isn't, or if you are asking for a way to check it. To check it you can review your /var/log/spamd/current file and see if spam checkups are being logged there. John Gastón Marión wrote: Hello everybody: I still problems in the

Re: [toaster] Spamassassin using nearly 2 % when there is no load.

the given command. >> Please suggest me. Thank you very much for your time. >> >> Sincerely, >> Sree >> >> - Original Message ---- >> From: Lampa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: toaster@shupp.org >> Sent: Wednesday, 17 October, 2007 12:31:40

Re: [toaster] Spamassassin using nearly 2 % when there is no load.

ay, 17 October, 2007 12:31:40 PM Subject: Re: [toaster] Spamassassin using nearly 2 % when there is no load. Hello, try spamassassin -D --lint, maybe can tell more where problem is. 2007/10/17, Sreedevi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi, > > Thanks for the time. Plea

Re: [toaster] Spamassassin using nearly 2 % when there is no load.

Hi Roman, Did you find any solution for this?. Sincerely, Sree - Original Message From: Roman Bělonohý <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: toaster@shupp.org Sent: Thursday, 18 October, 2007 1:42:39 AM Subject: Re: [toaster] Spamassassin using nearly 2 % when there is no load.

Re: [toaster] Spamassassin using nearly 2 % when there is no load.

> From: Lampa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: toaster@shupp.org > Sent: Wednesday, 17 October, 2007 12:31:40 PM > Subject: Re: [toaster] Spamassassin using nearly 2 % when there is no > load. > > Hello, > > try spamassassin -D --lint, maybe can tell more where pro

Re: [toaster] Spamassassin using nearly 2 % when there is no load.

assassin? I the usage going high only when spamd is running. > > Please suggest me more on this as I am newbie. > > Sincerely, > Sree. > > > - Original Message > From: Lampa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: toaster@shupp.org > Sent: Wednesday, 17 October, 200

Re: [toaster] Spamassassin using nearly 2 % when there is no load.

> > Please suggest me more on this as I am newbie. > > Sincerely, > Sree. > > > - Original Message > From: Lampa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: toaster@shupp.org > Sent: Wednesday, 17 October, 2007 12:00:42 PM > Subject: Re: [toaster] Spamassassin using

Re: [toaster] Spamassassin using nearly 2 % when there is no load.

oaster@shupp.org Sent: Wednesday, 17 October, 2007 12:00:42 PM Subject: Re: [toaster] Spamassassin using nearly 2 % when there is no load. Hello, there is 93.7% sy which means System CPU time The time the CPU has spent running the kernel and its processes. So there is something wrong wit

Re: [toaster] Spamassassin using nearly 2 % when there is no load.

Hello, there is 93.7% sy which means System CPU time The time the CPU has spent running the kernel and its processes. So there is something wrong with your setting, and it takes lot of time 4:16.97 2007/10/17, Sreedevi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi, > > I have followed the qmail toaste

Re: [toaster] SpamAssassin not learning enough ham

I use a plugin for squirrelmail that ads spam buttons. I also found a patch that modifies the behavior of that plugin to make it send the messages over to spamc to learn. In this way i managed to develop a very effective spam bayes database. I do not have much confidence in the auto-learn function

Re: [toaster] Spamassassin filtering

Have u heard about DCC? Can i just tar and install normally? The spamassassin will auto detect it or not? Follow the README or INSTALL instructions and turn it on in v310.pre.. You should check with spamassassin list too.

Re: [toaster] Spamassassin filtering

Have u heard about DCC? Can i just tar and install normally? The spamassassin will auto detect it or not? Rick Macdougall wrote: SKT/MIS/ROZI wrote: Hi all, This few days, i received a lot of spam. I have place some scoring inside the spam local.cf . I think may be it not too tight. Here is

Re: [toaster] Spamassassin filtering

SKT/MIS/ROZI wrote: Hi all, This few days, i received a lot of spam. I have place some scoring inside the spam local.cf . I think may be it not too tight. Here is my local.cf. ok_locales all skip_rbl_checks 1 Hi, Don't skip rbl checks for one and I believe the OSIRU checks are depreciate

Re: [toaster] Spamassassin per-user preferences

On 5/17/06, Rick Macdougall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: B Kreps wrote:> Rick,>> Thank you for the link, I'll give this a spin since it looks so simple;> perhaps it's even worth the time to fix the globals and port it to> Squirrelmail. I'm assuming I'll need to add the -q parameter to my spamd > inst

Re: [toaster] Spamassassin per-user preferences

B Kreps wrote: Rick, Thank you for the link, I'll give this a spin since it looks so simple; perhaps it's even worth the time to fix the globals and port it to Squirrelmail. I'm assuming I'll need to add the -q parameter to my spamd instantiation so it will read user preferences from SQL. Are th

Re: [toaster] Spamassassin per-user preferences

> Rick, > > Thank you for the link, I'll give this a spin since it looks so simple; > perhaps it's even worth the time to fix the globals and port it to > Squirrelmail. I'm assuming I'll need to add the -q parameter to my spamd > instantiation so it will read user preferences from SQL. Are there an

Re: [toaster] Spamassassin per-user preferences

Rick, Thank you for the link, I'll give this a spin since it looks so simple; perhaps it's even worth the time to fix the globals and port it to Squirrelmail. I'm assuming I'll need to add the -q parameter to my spamd instantiation so it will read user preferences from SQL. Are there any other tri

Re: [toaster] Spamassassin per-user preferences

B Kreps wrote: Greetings, I'm attempting to get per-user preferences working for spamassassin filtering and I wanted to know what solutions other "shupp-toaster" users are using. I've attempted (read: spent hours) to get the Squirrelmail "sasql" plugin to work, but the inclusion of this plugin

Re: [toaster] spamassassin compiling problems

Hello all, once I compiled spamassassin by using the CPAN shell. At make test I got the following testing error:: t/reportheader..Not found: msgidnotvalid = Message-Id is not valid, # Failed test 6 in t/SATest.pm at line 592 t/reportheader..ok

Re: [toaster] SpamAssassin prblem，help ！

On Mar 9, 2006, at 12:14 AM, 姜文栋 wrote: Content analysis details: (5.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description -- -- 0.0 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60%

Re: [toaster] spamassassin - How find spamassassin find my qmail queue?

Hello all, How find spamassassin find my qmail queue? How can I tell spamassassin or spamd where it should look for emails? Please help. Oliver

RE: [toaster] spamassassin - How can I test all?

ds, Edvin -Original Message- From: GoodnGo.de (R) Zentrale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Freitag, 03. März 2006 16:51 To: toaster@shupp.org Subject: Re: [toaster] spamassassin - How can I test all? Hello, I´am running spamassassin with Qmail and vpopmail, spamd is startet and supervised by d

Re: [toaster] spamassassin - How can I test all?

Hello, I´am running spamassassin with Qmail and vpopmail, spamd is startet and supervised by daemontools. spamd-logs are written to the file: /var/log/spamd/current spamd is started well according to /var/log/spamd/current But ... Where are the log file under which the spamassassin mailprocessi

Re: [toaster] spamassassin - How can I test all?

GoodnGo.de (R) Zentrale wrote: Hello Michael, hello all, Thank you. Even though I start the spamd and getting a correct start report from /var/log/spam/current my /var/log/maillogstays untouched . So I get the impression that something is wrong and my emailheaders staying unchanged be spa

Re: [toaster] spamassassin - How can I test all?

Hello Michael, hello all, Thank you. Even though I start the spamd and getting a correct start report from /var/log/spam/current my /var/log/maillogstays untouched . So I get the impression that something is wrong and my emailheaders staying unchanged be spamassassin. How can I get it run?

Re: [toaster] spamassassin - How can I test all?

* "GoodnGo.de (R) Zentrale" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006:03:02:00:20:00+0100] scribed: > Hello Bill, hello all, > > Ok, now spamd has been started without error messages. ´Thank u Bill. > > How can I test if spamassassin read the queue, and alters mailheaders???

Re: [toaster] spamassassin - How can I test all?

Hello Bill, hello all, Ok, now spamd has been started without error messages. ´Thank u Bill. How can I test if spamassassin read the queue, and alters mailheaders??? Please help. Oliver > comment out that line in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf, and restart > spamd. I think some of the direct

Re: [toaster] spamassassin - How can I test all?

GoodnGo.de (R) Zentrale wrote: > Hello Bill, hello all, > > I use multilog : > /usr/local/bin/multilog t /var/log/spamd > > I this retrorespect, I found an possible error. > Thus, /var/log/spamd/current says: > ### info: config: failed to parse, now a plugin, skipping: ok_languages en > de >

Re: [toaster] spamassassin - How can I test all?

Hello Bill, hello all, I use multilog : /usr/local/bin/multilog t /var/log/spamd I this retrorespect, I found an possible error. Thus, /var/log/spamd/current says: ### info: config: failed to parse, now a plugin, skipping: ok_languages en de What can this be? Oliver.

RE: [toaster] spamassassin - How can I test all?

sage- From: Bill Shupp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Mittwoch, 01. März 2006 23:47 To: toaster@shupp.org Subject: Re: [toaster] spamassassin - How can I test all? GoodnGo.de (R) Zentrale wrote: > Hello Edwin, hello all, > > tank you for your answer. > > /var/log/spa

Re: [toaster] spamassassin - How can I test all?

GoodnGo.de (R) Zentrale wrote: > Hello Edwin, hello all, > > tank you for your answer. > > /var/log/spamd/current says: > 2006-03-01 19:48:48.348481500 [1827] warn: prefork: select returned error on > server filehandle: Transport endpoint is not connected > 2006-03-01 19:48:52.453025500 [1827] in

Re: [toaster] spamassassin - How can I test all?

Hello Edwin, hello all, tank you for your answer. /var/log/spamd/current says: 2006-03-01 19:48:48.348481500 [1827] warn: prefork: select returned error on server filehandle: Transport endpoint is not connected 2006-03-01 19:48:52.453025500 [1827] info: config: failed to parse, now a plugin, skip

RE: [toaster] spamassassin - How can I test all?

ps axf you should see a spamd process started by supervise script or something like that. If spamassassin is running there is a log file in /var/log/spamd/current ( I suppose you use Bill's scripts ) Regards, Edvin -Original Message- From: GoodnGo.de (R) Zentrale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: [toaster] spamassassin / bayes

Noel Sanchez wrote: > 1. Recently upgraded my toaster to include all of the “options”. I’ve > noticed this in my /var/log/maillog: > > > > Mar 1 09:59:56 mail spamd[1704]: connection from mail [127.0.0.1] at > port 32812 > > Mar 1 09:59:56 mail spamd[2068]: info: setuid to clamav succeeded

Re: [toaster] spamassassin

by simscan via a maildrop filter seems to be doing the trick. What I haven't figured out is how to use a maildrop filter *and* TMDA ;-) > > Thanks > > > > -Original Message- > From: Bob Hutchinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 2:04

Re: [toaster] spamassassin

orwarded to it? If they forward the email to [EMAIL PROTECTED], I think it'll learn to ban my users at my domain instead. Am I doing this wrong? Thanks -Original Message- From: Bob Hutchinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 2:04 PM To: toaster@shupp.org

RE: [toaster] spamassassin

27;ll learn to ban my users at my domain instead. Am I doing this wrong? Thanks -Original Message- From: Bob Hutchinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 2:04 PM To: toaster@shupp.org Subject: Re: [toaster] spamassassin On Thursday 16 Feb 2006 19:52, Noel San

Re: [toaster] spamassassin

On Thursday 16 Feb 2006 19:52, Noel Sanchez wrote: > Hello All. I have used the toaster without the "options" installed for > quite some time, very happy with it. Now, my users have been getting > many spam emails. So, I installed ALL "options" per the toaster. Very > easy to do, thanks to Bill. Qu

Re: [toaster] SpamAssassin Perl Libraries for Redhat linux

esday, February 01, 2006 1:13 PM Subject: Re: [toaster] SpamAssassin Perl Libraries for Redhat linux On Feb 1, 2006, at 3:41 AM, Bruno Negrao wrote: Hi guys, The toaster guide says I should install the following libraries if i want to use spamassassin: apt-get install libdigest-sha1-perl

Re: [toaster] SpamAssassin Perl Libraries for Redhat linux

On Feb 1, 2006, at 3:41 AM, Bruno Negrao wrote: Hi guys, The toaster guide says I should install the following libraries if i want to use spamassassin: apt-get install libdigest-sha1-perl libnet-dns-perl \ libmail-spf-query-perl libgeo-ipfree-perl razor pyzor libnet-ident- perl \ libio-s

Re: [toaster] Spamassassin per-user rules

It's a piece of cake to design your own by tweaking the templates. Nick Gilbert wrote: It's a shame SquirrelMail is so damn UGLY compared to Horde/Imp. Are there any skins out there which are free?

Re: [toaster] Spamassassin per-user rules

>> Thanks very much for your help but I'm throwing in the towel... > > That's probably for the best at this point. Good luck! I'm very stubborn and I couldn't let this beat me... I've got IMAP authentication working now! :) I did a "yum install pam-devel", then recompiled courier-imap, deleted

Re: [toaster] Spamassassin per-user rules

Nick Gilbert wrote: Yeah, you did not do what I suggested in my last email. Change the authmodule list to include only the authpwd one. Then restart authdaemon. You're not setup for any of those other modules. But there's no such thing as "authpwd". In /usr/lib/courier-imap/etc/authdaemonrc it

Re: [toaster] Spamassassin per-user rules

> Yeah, you did not do what I suggested in my last email. Change the > authmodule list to include only the authpwd one. Then restart > authdaemon. You're not setup for any of those other modules. But there's no such thing as "authpwd". In /usr/lib/courier-imap/etc/authdaemonrc it says: # The

Re: [toaster] Spamassassin per-user rules

Nick Gilbert wrote: Yes, during the toaster install, /usr/lib/courier-imap/authdaemonrc is edited to remove all but authvchkpw. I had already changed that back, but I'm getting some errors in /var/log/maillog: [EMAIL PROTECTED] log]# cat maillog May 12 09:46:01 blue authdaemond: stopping authdaemo

Re: [toaster] Spamassassin per-user rules

> Yes, during the toaster install, /usr/lib/courier-imap/authdaemonrc is > edited to remove all but authvchkpw. I had already changed that back, but I'm getting some errors in /var/log/maillog: [EMAIL PROTECTED] log]# cat maillog May 12 09:46:01 blue authdaemond: stopping authdaemond children May

Re: [toaster] Spamassassin per-user rules

Nick Gilbert wrote: Has authentication of local users been disabled in this setup somehow? Yes, during the toaster install, /usr/lib/courier-imap/authdaemonrc is edited to remove all but authvchkpw. I've tried editing /usr/lib/courier-imap/etc/authdaemonrc and putting back the default list and t

Re: [toaster] Spamassassin per-user rules

I wrote: Is there a way I can bypass the vpopmail system for a single domain and control it using normal .qmail files and mailfilter? I found some new enthusiasm to persevere with a qmail toaster and I've got further towards the setup I want but have run into another problem. I've got mail delivery

Re: [toaster] Spamassassin per-user rules

Thanks for your replies. Is there a way I can bypass the vpopmail system for a single domain and control it using normal .qmail files and mailfilter? What tells qmail that a particular domain is handled by vpopmail? Nick...

Re: [toaster] Spamassassin per-user rules

I agree. I guess I should have worded my previos reply differently: The link I provided gives an option to have almost hands-off approach to qmial-toaster. And I have to say that I do like Bill's toaster setup mainly for the reason that I have to actually works through it and hopefully learn in pro

Re: [toaster] Spamassassin per-user rules

Bill's Toaster is hands down the best and easiest to use of all the Qmail toasters available (and I've tried them all, the ones worth trying anyway). Bill's version does require an individual to pay attention to detail, I know because I haven't and had to post embarrassing newbie questions on t

Re: [toaster] Spamassassin per-user rules

> I REALLY wish someone made a Qmail Toaster distribution that has all the > common stuff already installed to start with such that almost nobody > will need to patch it. That way you would effectively have a 'standard' > install that was very well supported and not different because > everyone'

Re: [toaster] Spamassassin per-user rules

Hmm.. this is all getting rather complicated for little me. Thanks very much for all your help but I'm coming to the conclusion that I'll probably have to use a commercial product. Well, do whatever works for you. But it has been my experience that while some of this stuff can be difficult to s

Re: [toaster] Spamassassin per-user rules

Bill Shupp wrote: Woops.. that should read "... because I DON'T want to use qmailadmin's spam detection feature". This is primarily because it defaults to off, which is now what I want. Damn, I picked the wrong week to stop sniffing glue. The above statement is also wrong... should read "...

Re: [toaster] Spamassassin per-user rules

Bill Shupp wrote: I only use the patches because I want to use qmailadmin with the spam detection scheme. Woops.. that should read "... because I DON'T want to use qmailadmin's spam detection feature". This is primarily because it defaults to off, which is now what I want. Regards, Bill

Re: [toaster] Spamassassin per-user rules

Nick Gilbert wrote: Hmm.. this is all getting rather complicated for little me. Thanks very much for all your help but I'm coming to the conclusion that I'll probably have to use a commercial product. Well, do whatever works for you. But it has been my experience that while some of this stuff c

Re: [toaster] Spamassassin per-user rules

Nick Gilbert wrote: > Hmm.. this is all getting rather complicated for little me. Thanks > very much for all your help but I'm coming to the conclusion that I'll > probably have to use a commercial product. As my colleague always says > "Linux is only free if your time has no value" - and I've alr

Re: [toaster] Spamassassin per-user rules

Is it possible to have per user rules with SpamAssassin in this configuration (ie using vpopmail)? If so, how do I do this? I use the vdelivermail - spamassassin + maildrop patches that I recently posted here on the list for vpopmail. Then, I run spamassassin with preferences in MySQL. Lastly,

Re: [toaster] Spamassassin per-user rules

Nick Gilbert wrote: Hi, Is it possible to have per user rules with SpamAssassin in this configuration (ie using vpopmail)? If so, how do I do this? I use the vdelivermail - spamassassin + maildrop patches that I recently posted here on the list for vpopmail. Then, I run spamassassin with prefere

Re: [toaster] Spamassassin and spamc giving very different results.

Nick Gilbert wrote: Perhaps the -L should be removed from the script on shupp.org? I assume it's there by mistake. Nope, it's there on purpose. I turn off network lookups be default. Regards, Bill

Re: [toaster] Spamassassin and spamc giving very different results.

> You have to change /service/spamd/run to : > > #!/bin/sh > exec /usr/bin/spamd -x -u vpopmail -s stderr 2>&1 > > > I believe that means that you skip the -d (I kinda forgot) ..the -d > would stand for only standard spamd checking.without the -d it'll > look for razor and DCC. This was it

Re: [toaster] Spamassassin and spamc giving very different results.

Bill Shupp wrote: Nick Gilbert wrote: Hi, I've asked this on the SA mailing list as well, but I think it's more likely it's a setup issue. I've followed Bills instructions exactly - the only additions being that I've installed Razor2 and DCC. Why do I get (VERY) different results on the same mac

Re: [toaster] Spamassassin and spamc giving very different results.

Nick Gilbert wrote: Hi, I've asked this on the SA mailing list as well, but I think it's more likely it's a setup issue. I've followed Bills instructions exactly - the only additions being that I've installed Razor2 and DCC. Why do I get (VERY) different results on the same machine if I call sp

Re: [toaster] Spamassassin child processes

Nick Gilbert wrote: Hi, My lowly box with only 256mb of RAM is trying to run too many spamd processes (5). How can I reduce this number? I can't seem to find how spamd is started. I was expecting it to be in /etc/init.d/ somewhere but perhaps things have moved around since I last built a qmail box

Re: [toaster] SpamAssassin problem

yc wrote: I dont know why the messages rejected. Who do this? SA or Simscan? Simscan. -- Eero

Re: [toaster] spamassassin and netqmail 1.05

Qing Yan wrote: Dear all, This is may be off topic to this list but I don't know where I can ask the question. I have setup netqmail 1.05 with bill's toaster. I found that spamassassin can't work fine with it. Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by mail by uid 506 with qmail-scanner-1.20 (f-prot

Re: [toaster] SpamAssassin Scripts

On Tuesday, December 10, 2002, at 03:25 PM, Michael Anderson wrote: Hi folks, I hate to join a new list with questions, however, I'm gonna do it this time, and after searching the archives, I believe this is relevent... Bill, I've noticed a few mails in the archives about SA and some scripts