On Mar 22, 2007, at 5:55 AM, Gary Bowling wrote:
When I send a message to someone else, in the headers for the
received message, you get the following:
Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.11.10?)
([EMAIL PROTECTED]@70.240.235.119)
by 0 with ESMTPA; 22 Mar 2007 11:50:48 -
This heade
ueli heuer wrote:
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 09:14:50 -0500
Gary Bowling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Not that MS is very good at following the RFC's, but interesting.
The MS-Server is behind the Firewall, isn't? do the ms-client
use SMTP-AUTH to send emails?
Don't know about the MS co
On March 22 2007, 3:59 pm, ueli heuer wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 09:14:50 -0500
> Gary Bowling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I can understand that the server header is of importance as well as the
>> email address of the client. But the internal/external address of the
>> client machine seems p
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 09:14:50 -0500
Gary Bowling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not that MS is very good at following the RFC's, but interesting.
The MS-Server is behind the Firewall, isn't? do the ms-client
use SMTP-AUTH to send emails?
> I can understand that the server header is of importance
Thanks Maciej, Interesting, didn't realize this was a big topic in the
email community. It's also interesting that email from a friend who's
company uses MS Exchange doesn't have the info in the header.
Not that MS is very good at following the RFC's, but interesting.
I can understand that t
> Thanks for the attitude!, I didn't really need a lesson in NAT or
> security. What I know about those things or how they are involved is not
> of concern here..
No need to get upset because... [read below]
> I simply had a question of the possibility of removing those lines from
> the header. I
Thanks for the attitude!, I didn't really need a lesson in NAT or
security. What I know about those things or how they are involved is not
of concern here..
I simply had a question of the possibility of removing those lines from
the header. I get email from other people using other MTA's tha
On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 08:19 -0500, Gary Bowling wrote:
>
> Seems a security risk because it shows both the internal address and
> the external address of the client, not the server. Which gives a
> hacker an easy way to start discovering outside/inside address pairs.
>
> Finding who the user that
Seems a security risk because it shows both the internal address and the
external address of the client, not the server. Which gives a hacker an
easy way to start discovering outside/inside address pairs.
Finding who the user that sent the message is, is identified by the
sending email addre
On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 07:55 -0500, Gary Bowling wrote:
> When I send a message to someone else, in the headers for the received
> message, you get the following:
>
> Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.11.10?) ([EMAIL
> PROTECTED]@70.240.235.119)
> by 0 with ESMTPA; 22 Mar 2007 11:50:48 -000
10 matches
Mail list logo
