I Vote for SPF
not for greylist.(could be optional like bill said)
smtp auth + tls (maybe TLS can be optional if ppl think so).
I think QMAILQUEUE patch works fine for SA or CLAM, i use a small C prog
that calls a script that runs SA and CLAM, i don't need no qmailscanner
or qscan, there is no ne
if you can, please,
check again all of the paths in the toaster - try installing the
components (vpopmail et cetera) in different paths/homedirs.
it is good to consider the following: it would be nice if you take some
steps forward to have a complete structure below one, configurable
directory
Bill Shupp wrote:
All,
I'm working on the 0.7 version of my netqmail patch. This time, I
thought I'd poll this list to see if there are any useful patches out
there that I might not be aware of... please post any suggestions here.
Nice to hear.
I'll tell you my probs or wishes. I know not all
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Spam Throttle does this, which has already been added in place of
Tarpit. But it's based on IP/Network, not user account.
Regards,
Bill
So is there any patch which may use user account instead of ip/network?
Not that I am aware of.
Regards,
Bill
> Spam Throttle does this, which has already been added in place of
> Tarpit. But it's based on IP/Network, not user account.
>
> Regards,
>
> Bill
>
So is there any patch which may use user account instead of ip/network?
Regards,
Qing
Edvin Seferovic wrote:
I find this idea very good... or for example - limit the number of messages
per smtp connection -> no mass mails allowed.. or something like that..
Spam Throttle does this, which has already been added in place of
Tarpit. But it's based on IP/Network, not user account.
Re
TED]
Subject: Re: [toaster] qmail patches
>
> Not very useful. people can send lot of mails using one mailserver.
>
> --
> Eero
>
How about limit the number of sending messages of users? For example, new
user can only send to 100 messages each day. I think this should prevent
us
>
> Not very useful. people can send lot of mails using one mailserver.
>
> --
> Eero
>
How about limit the number of sending messages of users? For example, new
user can only send to 100 messages each day. I think this should prevent
users to abuse the smtp server.
Regards,
Qing
qmail-ldap is very interisting too. Look at http://www.nrg4u.com
--
Jeronimo Zucco
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Public Key: www.riscozero.inf.br/pgp/jczucco.pgp
---
Risco Zero - Suporte, Conectividade e Segurança da Informação Ltda.
On Wed, 2004-05-05 at 15:41, Bill Shupp wrote:
> All,
>
> I'm working on the 0.7 version of my netqmail patch. This time, I
> thought I'd poll this list to see if there are any useful patches out
> there that I might not be aware of... please post any suggestions here.
The qmailctl script stil
I don't know if this will be fixed with the new TLS
patch version, butwith current one there's a problem
when using recordio on smtp stream.I got this
information:
>In the TLS patch there will be a line like
>SSL_set_fd(ssl,0);
>which connects the SSL engine to fd 0. This is not
normally a>pro
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I found this patch set (http://night.rdslink.ro/dudu/qmail/2004_05_02)
and
the patch to check if the "mail from" is the same as the one used to
authenticate seems to be very useful!
I am looking for such patch. Is there any standalone patch??
Not very useful. pe
> I found this patch set (http://night.rdslink.ro/dudu/qmail/2004_05_02)
> and
> the patch to check if the "mail from" is the same as the one used to
> authenticate seems to be very useful!
I am looking for such patch. Is there any standalone patch??
Regards,
Qing.
So far, the patch will be pretty much the same, but with new versions.
However, I'll be replacing the tarpit patch with the spam throttle
patch, since the tarpit mechanism is easily (and often) circumvented.
I'm contemplating adding the greylisting patch.. but will probably
leave that as an opt
> Edvin Seferovic wrote:
> http://www.pipeline.com.au/staff/mbowe/isp/webmail-server.htm
>
> Good web for spamassasin + virusscanner + razor2 install. They should be
> integrated to toaster instructions too.
>
I have read greylisting mailing list, someone stated that razor2 can do
even better tha
> All,
>
> I'm working on the 0.7 version of my netqmail patch. This time, I
> thought I'd poll this list to see if there are any useful patches out
> there that I might not be aware of... please post any suggestions here.
>
> So far, the patch will be pretty much the same, but with new versions.
Edvin Seferovic wrote:
How about a patch for an antivirus software? Or spammassasin... I ( for
example ) have troubles installing them, and getting them to work with
qmail... is there any chance to see those two topics in your toaster?
http://www.pipeline.com.au/staff/mbowe/isp/webmail-server.htm
It would be very nice if the toaster could reject messages for over quota
users instead of bouncing them. My experience told me that 99% of bouncing
messages are due to over quota reasons and almost all will be returned to
sender. This is the opinion of a guy running a free mail service with more
t
Thats what I ment.. how to use them and combine with this toaster..
Regards
Edvin S.
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Koch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mittwoch, 5. Mai 2004 23:20
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [toaster] qmail patches
Hi:
I disagree. Spamassassin and qmail
those two topics in your toaster?
Sincerely
Edvin Seferovic
-Original Message-
From: Christian Lyra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mittwoch, 5. Mai 2004 22:23
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [toaster] qmail patches
On Wednesday 05 May 2004 16:41, Bill Shupp wrote:
> All,
>
> I&#
On Wed, 2004-05-05 at 15:41, Bill Shupp wrote:
> All,
>
> I'm working on the 0.7 version of my netqmail patch. This time, I
> thought I'd poll this list to see if there are any useful patches out
> there that I might not be aware of... please post any suggestions here.
>
> So far, the patch wi
Can you have a link with a how-to do this piece work (SMTP-AUTH)? I have some
dificulties with netqmail, but with qmail-1.0.3 works fine.
Thank you
--
Jeronimo Zucco
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Public Key: www.riscozero.inf.br/pgp/jczucco.pgp
Jeronimo Zucco wrote:
In netqmail-1.0.5, smtp authentication not work, but only work with
qmail-1.0.3, without any difference in configuration. You can post a
how-to-do a qmail-smtp with AUTH and pop and smtp crypto.
Thanks
?
smtp-auth works just fine with netqmail-1.05 + the toaster patch.
In netqmail-1.0.5, smtp authentication not work, but only work with
qmail-1.0.3, without any difference in configuration. You can post a
how-to-do a qmail-smtp with AUTH and pop and smtp crypto.
Thanks
--
Jeronimo Zucco
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Public Key: www.riscozero.inf.br/pgp
Edvin Seferovic wrote:
How about a patch for an antivirus software? Or spammassasin... I ( for
example ) have troubles installing them, and getting them to work with
qmail... is there any chance to see those two topics in your toaster?
Most popular scanners use the QMAILQUEUE patch, like qmail-sca
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mittwoch, 5. Mai 2004 22:23
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [toaster] qmail patches
On Wednesday 05 May 2004 16:41, Bill Shupp wrote:
> All,
>
> I'm working on the 0.7 version of my netqmail patch. This time, I
> thought I'd poll this list to see i
On Wednesday 05 May 2004 16:41, Bill Shupp wrote:
> All,
>
> I'm working on the 0.7 version of my netqmail patch. This time, I
> thought I'd poll this list to see if there are any useful patches out
> there that I might not be aware of... please post any suggestions here.
>
> So far, the patch wil
27 matches
Mail list logo
