Hi:


I disagree. Spamassassin and qmail-scanner do a great job of handling viruses and spam and they are easy to install with plenty of options and add-ons including SPF. Let them handle spam and viruses. You could add them to the toaster but please don't add patches to take over their functions.

Otherwise you'd need to change the name from Toaster to Kitchen Sink.

At 04:27 PM 5/5/2004, you wrote:
How about a patch for an antivirus software? Or spammassasin... I ( for
example ) have troubles installing them, and getting them to work with
qmail... is there any chance to see those two topics in your toaster?

Sincerely

Edvin Seferovic

-----Original Message-----
From: Christian Lyra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mittwoch, 5. Mai 2004 22:23
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [toaster] qmail patches

On Wednesday 05 May 2004 16:41, Bill Shupp wrote:
> All,
>
> I'm working on the 0.7 version of my netqmail patch.  This time, I
> thought I'd poll this list to see if there are any useful patches out
> there that I might not be aware of... please post any suggestions here.
>
> So far, the patch will be pretty much the same, but with new versions.
> However, I'll be replacing the tarpit patch with the spam throttle
> patch, since the tarpit mechanism is easily (and often) circumvented.
> I'm contemplating adding the greylisting patch.. but will probably leave
> that as an optional add-on.  Is anyone using the greylisting patch in
> production?  Any thoughts on it?  What about SPF?


spf would be good :-)


        I found this patch set
(http://night.rdslink.ro/dudu/qmail/2004_05_02) and
the patch to check if the "mail from" is the same as the one used to
authenticate seems to be very useful!

>
> Regards,
>
> Bill Shupp

--
Christian Lyra
POP-PR - RNP

http://lyra.soueu.com.br
http://wecanstopspam.org

  Thus spake the master programmer:
  ``A well-written program is its own heaven; a poorly-written program is
its
own hell.''
                                                The Tao Of Programing

Best Regards,


Jeff Koch, Intersessions




Reply via email to