Júlio Olivares wrote:
I know both, but qfilter allows me to write my own filters, for example,
block file types, filter Nigeria scam (wich gave me a big problem with my
hosting company), etc.
I have almost active 6 users (I run a free mail service) and it's not so
resource intensive as that.
> > Take a look at qscanq (http://qscanq.org/), a C-based program that
> > rejects viruses at the SMTP level. Should be less resource intensive
> > than spawning a Perl program for every incoming message.
> simscan is another one. I can vouch for simscan.. :)
I know both, but qfilter allows m
Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold wrote:
Oh? Have you posted at all on the simscan list? I'm running it here
with no problem...
nm, figured out what was stopping it .. combo of testing qscanq and not
uninstalling their wrapper and also wrong perms on /var/qmail/simscan/
directory.
Seems to work now
John Melville wrote:
Wish I could get that thing to work, tried a couple a times now and it
just doesn't seem to work, mail seems to just disappear.
Oh? Have you posted at all on the simscan list? I'm running it here
with no problem...
John
--
---
Jason 'XenoPhage' Fri
Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold wrote:
simscan is another one. I can vouch for simscan.. :)
Wish I could get that thing to work, tried a couple a times now and it
just doesn't seem to work, mail seems to just disappear.
John
Tom Collins wrote:
On Nov 22, 2004, at 8:31 AM, Júlio Olivares wrote:
I improved my toaster by rejecting virus at smtp level instead of
deleting
them at delivery time. I use Clamav+qmail-qfilter with this script:
Take a look at qscanq (http://qscanq.org/), a C-based program that
rejects viruses
On Nov 22, 2004, at 8:31 AM, Júlio Olivares wrote:
I improved my toaster by rejecting virus at smtp level instead of
deleting
them at delivery time. I use Clamav+qmail-qfilter with this script:
Take a look at qscanq (http://qscanq.org/), a C-based program that
rejects viruses at the SMTP level.
> Twice today I've had to restart my mail services because ClamAV was
> unable to allocate more memory. I know this is not the ClamAV list,
> but I was wondering if anyone knew about configuration tweaks I could do
> within the toaster itself to make it more efficient. My next steps,
> of course,
Hi Matt,
Try simscan.
http://www.inter7.com/?page=simscan
Lucas
Thursday, November 18, 2004, 10:41:28 PM, you wrote:
MG> Greetings, all.
MG> We're running the latest version of the toaster here for about 2000 users,
MG> recently migrated from a previous version. The only non-toaster
app
Greetings, all.
We're running the latest version of the toaster here for about 2000 users,
recently migrated from a previous version. The only non-toaster applications
installed are SpamAssassin and ClamAV. This is the same setup we had
running on a server with less memory and CPU a couple of we
10 matches
Mail list logo
